Importance of the vein of Marshall involvement in mitral isthmus ablation

Taishi Fujisawa, Takehiro Kimura, Kazuaki Nakajima, Takahiko Nishiyama, Yoshinori Katsumata, Yoshiyasu Aizawa, Keiichi Fukuda, Seiji Takatsuki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Epicardiac conduction via the vein of Marshall (VOM) can bypass the mitral isthmus (MI) line, making MI ablation difficult. This study aimed to assess the contribution of the VOM in achieving MI conduction block. Methods: This study included 143 consecutive patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent initial MI ablation. They were retrospectively classified into two groups, a VOM-guided group (n = 28) and a conventional group (n = 115), according to the use of a 2-Fr electrode catheter inserted in the VOM. The acute success rate of achieving MI block and the ablation data were assessed. When the bidirectional block was verified exclusively in the VOM or coronary sinus (CS) electrodes, we defined it as a pseudo MI block. In the VOM-guided group, we ascertained the complete MI block, verified both in the VOM and CS electrodes. Results: In the VOM-guided group, the pseudoblock was observed in 33.3% of the patients during MI ablation. With significantly less radiofrequency energy (19 322.6 ± 11 352.8 vs 25 389.3 ± 19 951.9, P = 0.04), we achieved a similar level of success rate in MI ablation in the VOM-guided group (96.4% vs 91.3%, P = 0.36). Notably, after achieving complete MI block, atrial burst pacing induced two perimitral flutters in the VOM-guided group, which were successfully terminated by the additional radiofrequency application. Conclusions: Assessment of electrical conduction through the VOM could clarify the existence of a pseudo MI conduction block. However, the existence of a slow conduction through the MI could be detected only after induction of perimitral atrial tachycardia with atrial programmed stimulation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Veins
Electrodes
Coronary Sinus
carbosulfan
Tachycardia
Atrial Fibrillation
Catheters

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • catheter ablation
  • mitral isthmus
  • perimitral flutter
  • vein of Marshall

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Importance of the vein of Marshall involvement in mitral isthmus ablation. / Fujisawa, Taishi; Kimura, Takehiro; Nakajima, Kazuaki; Nishiyama, Takahiko; Katsumata, Yoshinori; Aizawa, Yoshiyasu; Fukuda, Keiichi; Takatsuki, Seiji.

In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fujisawa, Taishi ; Kimura, Takehiro ; Nakajima, Kazuaki ; Nishiyama, Takahiko ; Katsumata, Yoshinori ; Aizawa, Yoshiyasu ; Fukuda, Keiichi ; Takatsuki, Seiji. / Importance of the vein of Marshall involvement in mitral isthmus ablation. In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 2019.
@article{32c6e134294e4aff81048f5283c111b5,
title = "Importance of the vein of Marshall involvement in mitral isthmus ablation",
abstract = "Background: Epicardiac conduction via the vein of Marshall (VOM) can bypass the mitral isthmus (MI) line, making MI ablation difficult. This study aimed to assess the contribution of the VOM in achieving MI conduction block. Methods: This study included 143 consecutive patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent initial MI ablation. They were retrospectively classified into two groups, a VOM-guided group (n = 28) and a conventional group (n = 115), according to the use of a 2-Fr electrode catheter inserted in the VOM. The acute success rate of achieving MI block and the ablation data were assessed. When the bidirectional block was verified exclusively in the VOM or coronary sinus (CS) electrodes, we defined it as a pseudo MI block. In the VOM-guided group, we ascertained the complete MI block, verified both in the VOM and CS electrodes. Results: In the VOM-guided group, the pseudoblock was observed in 33.3{\%} of the patients during MI ablation. With significantly less radiofrequency energy (19 322.6 ± 11 352.8 vs 25 389.3 ± 19 951.9, P = 0.04), we achieved a similar level of success rate in MI ablation in the VOM-guided group (96.4{\%} vs 91.3{\%}, P = 0.36). Notably, after achieving complete MI block, atrial burst pacing induced two perimitral flutters in the VOM-guided group, which were successfully terminated by the additional radiofrequency application. Conclusions: Assessment of electrical conduction through the VOM could clarify the existence of a pseudo MI conduction block. However, the existence of a slow conduction through the MI could be detected only after induction of perimitral atrial tachycardia with atrial programmed stimulation.",
keywords = "atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, mitral isthmus, perimitral flutter, vein of Marshall",
author = "Taishi Fujisawa and Takehiro Kimura and Kazuaki Nakajima and Takahiko Nishiyama and Yoshinori Katsumata and Yoshiyasu Aizawa and Keiichi Fukuda and Seiji Takatsuki",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pace.13640",
language = "English",
journal = "PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "0147-8389",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Importance of the vein of Marshall involvement in mitral isthmus ablation

AU - Fujisawa, Taishi

AU - Kimura, Takehiro

AU - Nakajima, Kazuaki

AU - Nishiyama, Takahiko

AU - Katsumata, Yoshinori

AU - Aizawa, Yoshiyasu

AU - Fukuda, Keiichi

AU - Takatsuki, Seiji

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Epicardiac conduction via the vein of Marshall (VOM) can bypass the mitral isthmus (MI) line, making MI ablation difficult. This study aimed to assess the contribution of the VOM in achieving MI conduction block. Methods: This study included 143 consecutive patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent initial MI ablation. They were retrospectively classified into two groups, a VOM-guided group (n = 28) and a conventional group (n = 115), according to the use of a 2-Fr electrode catheter inserted in the VOM. The acute success rate of achieving MI block and the ablation data were assessed. When the bidirectional block was verified exclusively in the VOM or coronary sinus (CS) electrodes, we defined it as a pseudo MI block. In the VOM-guided group, we ascertained the complete MI block, verified both in the VOM and CS electrodes. Results: In the VOM-guided group, the pseudoblock was observed in 33.3% of the patients during MI ablation. With significantly less radiofrequency energy (19 322.6 ± 11 352.8 vs 25 389.3 ± 19 951.9, P = 0.04), we achieved a similar level of success rate in MI ablation in the VOM-guided group (96.4% vs 91.3%, P = 0.36). Notably, after achieving complete MI block, atrial burst pacing induced two perimitral flutters in the VOM-guided group, which were successfully terminated by the additional radiofrequency application. Conclusions: Assessment of electrical conduction through the VOM could clarify the existence of a pseudo MI conduction block. However, the existence of a slow conduction through the MI could be detected only after induction of perimitral atrial tachycardia with atrial programmed stimulation.

AB - Background: Epicardiac conduction via the vein of Marshall (VOM) can bypass the mitral isthmus (MI) line, making MI ablation difficult. This study aimed to assess the contribution of the VOM in achieving MI conduction block. Methods: This study included 143 consecutive patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent initial MI ablation. They were retrospectively classified into two groups, a VOM-guided group (n = 28) and a conventional group (n = 115), according to the use of a 2-Fr electrode catheter inserted in the VOM. The acute success rate of achieving MI block and the ablation data were assessed. When the bidirectional block was verified exclusively in the VOM or coronary sinus (CS) electrodes, we defined it as a pseudo MI block. In the VOM-guided group, we ascertained the complete MI block, verified both in the VOM and CS electrodes. Results: In the VOM-guided group, the pseudoblock was observed in 33.3% of the patients during MI ablation. With significantly less radiofrequency energy (19 322.6 ± 11 352.8 vs 25 389.3 ± 19 951.9, P = 0.04), we achieved a similar level of success rate in MI ablation in the VOM-guided group (96.4% vs 91.3%, P = 0.36). Notably, after achieving complete MI block, atrial burst pacing induced two perimitral flutters in the VOM-guided group, which were successfully terminated by the additional radiofrequency application. Conclusions: Assessment of electrical conduction through the VOM could clarify the existence of a pseudo MI conduction block. However, the existence of a slow conduction through the MI could be detected only after induction of perimitral atrial tachycardia with atrial programmed stimulation.

KW - atrial fibrillation

KW - catheter ablation

KW - mitral isthmus

KW - perimitral flutter

KW - vein of Marshall

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063960332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063960332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pace.13640

DO - 10.1111/pace.13640

M3 - Article

C2 - 30779354

AN - SCOPUS:85063960332

JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 0147-8389

ER -