TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving perioperative outcomes through minimally invasive and non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring techniques
AU - Yamada, Takashige
AU - Vacas, Susana
AU - Gricourt, Yann
AU - Cannesson, Maxime
N1 - Funding Information:
SV has received research support through the Innovation Seed Grant from the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, UCLA. MC has received research support from Edwards Lifesciences through his Department and NIH R01 GM117622-Machine learning of physiological variables to predict diagnose and treat cardiorespiratory instability, and NIH R01 NR013912-Predicting Patient Instability Noninvasively for Nursing Care-Two (PPINNC-2).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Yamada, Vacas, Gricourt and Cannesson.
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - An increasing number of patients require precise intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring due to aging and comorbidities. To prevent undesirable outcomes from intraoperative hypotension or hypoperfusion, appropriate threshold settings are required. These setting can vary widely from patient to patient. Goal-directed therapy techniques allow for flow monitoring as the standard for perioperative fluid management. Based on the concept of personalized medicine, individual assessment and treatment are more advantageous than conventional or uniform interventions. The recent development of minimally and noninvasive monitoring devices make it possible to apply detailed control, tracking, and observation of broad patient populations, all while reducing adverse complications. In this manuscript, we review the monitoring features of each device, together with possible advantages and disadvantages of their use in optimizing patient hemodynamic management.
AB - An increasing number of patients require precise intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring due to aging and comorbidities. To prevent undesirable outcomes from intraoperative hypotension or hypoperfusion, appropriate threshold settings are required. These setting can vary widely from patient to patient. Goal-directed therapy techniques allow for flow monitoring as the standard for perioperative fluid management. Based on the concept of personalized medicine, individual assessment and treatment are more advantageous than conventional or uniform interventions. The recent development of minimally and noninvasive monitoring devices make it possible to apply detailed control, tracking, and observation of broad patient populations, all while reducing adverse complications. In this manuscript, we review the monitoring features of each device, together with possible advantages and disadvantages of their use in optimizing patient hemodynamic management.
KW - Blood pressure
KW - Hemodynamic
KW - Hemodynamic monitoring
KW - Monitor
KW - Non-invasive
KW - Outcomes
KW - Perioperative complications
KW - Perioperative outcomes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050074958&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050074958&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fmed.2018.00144
DO - 10.3389/fmed.2018.00144
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85050074958
SN - 2296-858X
VL - 5
JO - Frontiers in Medicine
JF - Frontiers in Medicine
IS - MAY
M1 - 144
ER -