Abstract
People may follow a manual to achieve safety (Safety - I). On the other hand, it has been proposed in recent years that people sometimes respond flexibly to situations in order to achieve safety (Safety - II). Both modes (Safety - I and Safety - II) should be used mutually [1]; therefore, one strategy is to apply the Safety - I mode when the fluctuation of conditions is below a certain level and to apply the Safety - II mode when it is above that level. In this research, in order to clarify the level of situation fluctuation at which it is appropriate to switch modes from Safety - I to Safety - II, we conducted a simulator experiment involving a fire-extinguishing activity. As a result, it was revealed that people adopted resilient behavior when the situation fluctuation exceeded a certain level and resilient behavior led to success when the fluctuation was not too large or too small.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) - Volume II |
| Subtitle of host publication | Safety and Health, Slips, Trips and Falls |
| Editors | Yushi Fujita, Sebastiano Bagnara, Thomas Alexander, Riccardo Tartaglia, Sara Albolino |
| Publisher | Springer Verlag |
| Pages | 509-516 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783319960883 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 Jan 1 |
| Event | 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, IEA 2018 - Florence, Italy Duration: 2018 Aug 26 → 2018 Aug 30 |
Publication series
| Name | Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing |
|---|---|
| Volume | 819 |
| ISSN (Print) | 2194-5357 |
Other
| Other | 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, IEA 2018 |
|---|---|
| Country | Italy |
| City | Florence |
| Period | 18/8/26 → 18/8/30 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Resilience engineering
- Safety - I
- Safety - II
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Control and Systems Engineering
- Computer Science(all)
Cite this
In What Conditions Do People Adopt “Resilient” Behavior for Safety? Experimental Study for Safety - II. / Kubo, Naoki; Nakanishi, Miwa.
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) - Volume II: Safety and Health, Slips, Trips and Falls. ed. / Yushi Fujita; Sebastiano Bagnara; Thomas Alexander; Riccardo Tartaglia; Sara Albolino. Springer Verlag, 2019. p. 509-516 (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Vol. 819).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution
}
TY - GEN
T1 - In What Conditions Do People Adopt “Resilient” Behavior for Safety?
T2 - Experimental Study for Safety - II
AU - Kubo, Naoki
AU - Nakanishi, Miwa
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - People may follow a manual to achieve safety (Safety - I). On the other hand, it has been proposed in recent years that people sometimes respond flexibly to situations in order to achieve safety (Safety - II). Both modes (Safety - I and Safety - II) should be used mutually [1]; therefore, one strategy is to apply the Safety - I mode when the fluctuation of conditions is below a certain level and to apply the Safety - II mode when it is above that level. In this research, in order to clarify the level of situation fluctuation at which it is appropriate to switch modes from Safety - I to Safety - II, we conducted a simulator experiment involving a fire-extinguishing activity. As a result, it was revealed that people adopted resilient behavior when the situation fluctuation exceeded a certain level and resilient behavior led to success when the fluctuation was not too large or too small.
AB - People may follow a manual to achieve safety (Safety - I). On the other hand, it has been proposed in recent years that people sometimes respond flexibly to situations in order to achieve safety (Safety - II). Both modes (Safety - I and Safety - II) should be used mutually [1]; therefore, one strategy is to apply the Safety - I mode when the fluctuation of conditions is below a certain level and to apply the Safety - II mode when it is above that level. In this research, in order to clarify the level of situation fluctuation at which it is appropriate to switch modes from Safety - I to Safety - II, we conducted a simulator experiment involving a fire-extinguishing activity. As a result, it was revealed that people adopted resilient behavior when the situation fluctuation exceeded a certain level and resilient behavior led to success when the fluctuation was not too large or too small.
KW - Resilience engineering
KW - Safety - I
KW - Safety - II
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051762541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051762541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_54
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_54
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9783319960883
T3 - Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
SP - 509
EP - 516
BT - Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) - Volume II
A2 - Fujita, Yushi
A2 - Bagnara, Sebastiano
A2 - Alexander, Thomas
A2 - Tartaglia, Riccardo
A2 - Albolino, Sara
PB - Springer Verlag
ER -