In What Conditions Do People Adopt “Resilient” Behavior for Safety?: Experimental Study for Safety - II

Naoki Kubo; Miwa Nakanishi

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_54

In What Conditions Do People Adopt “Resilient” Behavior for Safety? Experimental Study for Safety - II

Naoki Kubo, Miwa Nakanishi

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

People may follow a manual to achieve safety (Safety - I). On the other hand, it has been proposed in recent years that people sometimes respond flexibly to situations in order to achieve safety (Safety - II). Both modes (Safety - I and Safety - II) should be used mutually [1]; therefore, one strategy is to apply the Safety - I mode when the fluctuation of conditions is below a certain level and to apply the Safety - II mode when it is above that level. In this research, in order to clarify the level of situation fluctuation at which it is appropriate to switch modes from Safety - I to Safety - II, we conducted a simulator experiment involving a fire-extinguishing activity. As a result, it was revealed that people adopted resilient behavior when the situation fluctuation exceeded a certain level and resilient behavior led to success when the fluctuation was not too large or too small.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) - Volume II
Subtitle of host publication	Safety and Health, Slips, Trips and Falls
Editors	Yushi Fujita, Sebastiano Bagnara, Thomas Alexander, Riccardo Tartaglia, Sara Albolino
Publisher	Springer Verlag
Pages	509-516
Number of pages	8
ISBN (Print)	9783319960883
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_54
Publication status	Published - 2019 Jan 1
Event	20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, IEA 2018 - Florence, Italy Duration: 2018 Aug 26 → 2018 Aug 30

Publication series

Name	Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Volume	819
ISSN (Print)	2194-5357

Other

Other	20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, IEA 2018
Country/Territory	Italy
City	Florence
Period	18/8/26 → 18/8/30

Keywords

Resilience engineering
Safety - I
Safety - II

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Control and Systems Engineering
Computer Science(all)

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_54

Cite this

Kubo, N., & Nakanishi, M. (2019). In What Conditions Do People Adopt “Resilient” Behavior for Safety? Experimental Study for Safety - II. In Y. Fujita, S. Bagnara, T. Alexander, R. Tartaglia, & S. Albolino (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) - Volume II: Safety and Health, Slips, Trips and Falls (pp. 509-516). (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Vol. 819). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_54

In What Conditions Do People Adopt “Resilient” Behavior for Safety? Experimental Study for Safety - II. / Kubo, Naoki; Nakanishi, Miwa.

Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) - Volume II: Safety and Health, Slips, Trips and Falls. ed. / Yushi Fujita; Sebastiano Bagnara; Thomas Alexander; Riccardo Tartaglia; Sara Albolino. Springer Verlag, 2019. p. 509-516 (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Vol. 819).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Kubo, N & Nakanishi, M 2019, In What Conditions Do People Adopt “Resilient” Behavior for Safety? Experimental Study for Safety - II. in Y Fujita, S Bagnara, T Alexander, R Tartaglia & S Albolino (eds), Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) - Volume II: Safety and Health, Slips, Trips and Falls. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 819, Springer Verlag, pp. 509-516, 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, IEA 2018, Florence, Italy, 18/8/26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_54

Kubo N, Nakanishi M. In What Conditions Do People Adopt “Resilient” Behavior for Safety? Experimental Study for Safety - II. In Fujita Y, Bagnara S, Alexander T, Tartaglia R, Albolino S, editors, Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) - Volume II: Safety and Health, Slips, Trips and Falls. Springer Verlag. 2019. p. 509-516. (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_54

Kubo, Naoki ; Nakanishi, Miwa. / In What Conditions Do People Adopt “Resilient” Behavior for Safety? Experimental Study for Safety - II. Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) - Volume II: Safety and Health, Slips, Trips and Falls. editor / Yushi Fujita ; Sebastiano Bagnara ; Thomas Alexander ; Riccardo Tartaglia ; Sara Albolino. Springer Verlag, 2019. pp. 509-516 (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing).

@inproceedings{c809f260cd2e4f72b7798c4251df2893,

title = "In What Conditions Do People Adopt “Resilient” Behavior for Safety?: Experimental Study for Safety - II",

abstract = "People may follow a manual to achieve safety (Safety - I). On the other hand, it has been proposed in recent years that people sometimes respond flexibly to situations in order to achieve safety (Safety - II). Both modes (Safety - I and Safety - II) should be used mutually [1]; therefore, one strategy is to apply the Safety - I mode when the fluctuation of conditions is below a certain level and to apply the Safety - II mode when it is above that level. In this research, in order to clarify the level of situation fluctuation at which it is appropriate to switch modes from Safety - I to Safety - II, we conducted a simulator experiment involving a fire-extinguishing activity. As a result, it was revealed that people adopted resilient behavior when the situation fluctuation exceeded a certain level and resilient behavior led to success when the fluctuation was not too large or too small.",

keywords = "Resilience engineering, Safety - I, Safety - II",

author = "Naoki Kubo and Miwa Nakanishi",

year = "2019",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_54",

language = "English",

isbn = "9783319960883",

series = "Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

pages = "509--516",

editor = "Yushi Fujita and Sebastiano Bagnara and Thomas Alexander and Riccardo Tartaglia and Sara Albolino",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) - Volume II",

address = "Germany",

note = "20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, IEA 2018 ; Conference date: 26-08-2018 Through 30-08-2018",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - In What Conditions Do People Adopt “Resilient” Behavior for Safety?

T2 - 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, IEA 2018

AU - Kubo, Naoki

AU - Nakanishi, Miwa

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - People may follow a manual to achieve safety (Safety - I). On the other hand, it has been proposed in recent years that people sometimes respond flexibly to situations in order to achieve safety (Safety - II). Both modes (Safety - I and Safety - II) should be used mutually [1]; therefore, one strategy is to apply the Safety - I mode when the fluctuation of conditions is below a certain level and to apply the Safety - II mode when it is above that level. In this research, in order to clarify the level of situation fluctuation at which it is appropriate to switch modes from Safety - I to Safety - II, we conducted a simulator experiment involving a fire-extinguishing activity. As a result, it was revealed that people adopted resilient behavior when the situation fluctuation exceeded a certain level and resilient behavior led to success when the fluctuation was not too large or too small.

AB - People may follow a manual to achieve safety (Safety - I). On the other hand, it has been proposed in recent years that people sometimes respond flexibly to situations in order to achieve safety (Safety - II). Both modes (Safety - I and Safety - II) should be used mutually [1]; therefore, one strategy is to apply the Safety - I mode when the fluctuation of conditions is below a certain level and to apply the Safety - II mode when it is above that level. In this research, in order to clarify the level of situation fluctuation at which it is appropriate to switch modes from Safety - I to Safety - II, we conducted a simulator experiment involving a fire-extinguishing activity. As a result, it was revealed that people adopted resilient behavior when the situation fluctuation exceeded a certain level and resilient behavior led to success when the fluctuation was not too large or too small.

KW - Resilience engineering

KW - Safety - I

KW - Safety - II

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051762541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051762541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_54

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_54

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85051762541

SN - 9783319960883

T3 - Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

SP - 509

EP - 516

BT - Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) - Volume II

A2 - Fujita, Yushi

A2 - Bagnara, Sebastiano

A2 - Alexander, Thomas

A2 - Tartaglia, Riccardo

A2 - Albolino, Sara

PB - Springer Verlag

Y2 - 26 August 2018 through 30 August 2018

ER -