Inaccuracy and misjudged factors of glasgow coma scale scores

Jun Namiki

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury and other neurological disorders are primarily assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) to evaluate consciousness. However, GCS score assignment is far from sufficiently reliable for correct assessment, especially with inexperienced users. In this chapter, we reveal what factors of the GCS are misjudged when assessed by inexperienced medical personnel. We analyzed GCS eye, verbal, and motor response (EVM) scoring profiles conducted by postgraduate year 1 junior residents (n = 94) before they began residency in specific departments. GCS assessment was tested using a video simulation that portrayed mock patients with eight different levels of consciousness that are frequently encountered in trauma patients at the emergency department. On average, 26% ± 18% of examinees failed to provide the correct EVM profiles for the eight selected consciousness levels. Primary misjudged GCS factors belonged to two categories: the assessment of " confused conversation (verbal score of 4) ", and the assessment of "withdrawal motor response (motor score of 4)". Additional instruction regarding the specific misjudged factors described in this chapter may help inexperienced medical personnel improve the reliability of GCS score assignment to casualties or patients with consciousness disturbance.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComas and Syncope: Causes, Prevention and Treatment
PublisherNova Science Publishers, Inc.
Pages155-166
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)9781621006039
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Glasgow Coma Scale
Consciousness
Internship and Residency
Nervous System Diseases
Hospital Emergency Service
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Namiki, J. (2012). Inaccuracy and misjudged factors of glasgow coma scale scores. In Comas and Syncope: Causes, Prevention and Treatment (pp. 155-166). Nova Science Publishers, Inc..

Inaccuracy and misjudged factors of glasgow coma scale scores. / Namiki, Jun.

Comas and Syncope: Causes, Prevention and Treatment. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2012. p. 155-166.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Namiki, J 2012, Inaccuracy and misjudged factors of glasgow coma scale scores. in Comas and Syncope: Causes, Prevention and Treatment. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., pp. 155-166.
Namiki J. Inaccuracy and misjudged factors of glasgow coma scale scores. In Comas and Syncope: Causes, Prevention and Treatment. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 2012. p. 155-166
Namiki, Jun. / Inaccuracy and misjudged factors of glasgow coma scale scores. Comas and Syncope: Causes, Prevention and Treatment. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2012. pp. 155-166
@inbook{be1b6c810199489cb9d08b59929e955c,
title = "Inaccuracy and misjudged factors of glasgow coma scale scores",
abstract = "Traumatic brain injury and other neurological disorders are primarily assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) to evaluate consciousness. However, GCS score assignment is far from sufficiently reliable for correct assessment, especially with inexperienced users. In this chapter, we reveal what factors of the GCS are misjudged when assessed by inexperienced medical personnel. We analyzed GCS eye, verbal, and motor response (EVM) scoring profiles conducted by postgraduate year 1 junior residents (n = 94) before they began residency in specific departments. GCS assessment was tested using a video simulation that portrayed mock patients with eight different levels of consciousness that are frequently encountered in trauma patients at the emergency department. On average, 26{\%} ± 18{\%} of examinees failed to provide the correct EVM profiles for the eight selected consciousness levels. Primary misjudged GCS factors belonged to two categories: the assessment of {"} confused conversation (verbal score of 4) {"}, and the assessment of {"}withdrawal motor response (motor score of 4){"}. Additional instruction regarding the specific misjudged factors described in this chapter may help inexperienced medical personnel improve the reliability of GCS score assignment to casualties or patients with consciousness disturbance.",
author = "Jun Namiki",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781621006039",
pages = "155--166",
booktitle = "Comas and Syncope: Causes, Prevention and Treatment",
publisher = "Nova Science Publishers, Inc.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Inaccuracy and misjudged factors of glasgow coma scale scores

AU - Namiki, Jun

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Traumatic brain injury and other neurological disorders are primarily assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) to evaluate consciousness. However, GCS score assignment is far from sufficiently reliable for correct assessment, especially with inexperienced users. In this chapter, we reveal what factors of the GCS are misjudged when assessed by inexperienced medical personnel. We analyzed GCS eye, verbal, and motor response (EVM) scoring profiles conducted by postgraduate year 1 junior residents (n = 94) before they began residency in specific departments. GCS assessment was tested using a video simulation that portrayed mock patients with eight different levels of consciousness that are frequently encountered in trauma patients at the emergency department. On average, 26% ± 18% of examinees failed to provide the correct EVM profiles for the eight selected consciousness levels. Primary misjudged GCS factors belonged to two categories: the assessment of " confused conversation (verbal score of 4) ", and the assessment of "withdrawal motor response (motor score of 4)". Additional instruction regarding the specific misjudged factors described in this chapter may help inexperienced medical personnel improve the reliability of GCS score assignment to casualties or patients with consciousness disturbance.

AB - Traumatic brain injury and other neurological disorders are primarily assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) to evaluate consciousness. However, GCS score assignment is far from sufficiently reliable for correct assessment, especially with inexperienced users. In this chapter, we reveal what factors of the GCS are misjudged when assessed by inexperienced medical personnel. We analyzed GCS eye, verbal, and motor response (EVM) scoring profiles conducted by postgraduate year 1 junior residents (n = 94) before they began residency in specific departments. GCS assessment was tested using a video simulation that portrayed mock patients with eight different levels of consciousness that are frequently encountered in trauma patients at the emergency department. On average, 26% ± 18% of examinees failed to provide the correct EVM profiles for the eight selected consciousness levels. Primary misjudged GCS factors belonged to two categories: the assessment of " confused conversation (verbal score of 4) ", and the assessment of "withdrawal motor response (motor score of 4)". Additional instruction regarding the specific misjudged factors described in this chapter may help inexperienced medical personnel improve the reliability of GCS score assignment to casualties or patients with consciousness disturbance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891978293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891978293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781621006039

SP - 155

EP - 166

BT - Comas and Syncope: Causes, Prevention and Treatment

PB - Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

ER -