TY - JOUR
T1 - Incidence of transfusion-related adverse reactions per patient reflects the potential risk of transfusion therapy in Japan
AU - Kato, Hidefumi
AU - Uruma, Motoaki
AU - Okuyama, Yoshiki
AU - Fujita, Hiroshi
AU - Handa, Makoto
AU - Tomiyama, Yoshiaki
AU - Shimodaira, Shigetaka
AU - Kurata, Yoshiyuki
AU - Takamoto, Shigeru
PY - 2013/8
Y1 - 2013/8
N2 - Objectives: To describe the frequency of adverse reactions (ARs) after transfusion on both per transfused patient and per transfused unit bases. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of data available from records of 6 hospitals on the total number of transfusions and documented ARs between January 2008 and December 2009 for RBCs, fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), and platelet concentrates (PCs). Results: The incidence of ARs to RBCs, FFP, and PCs per transfused unit was 0.6%, 1.3%, and 3.8%, respectively. The incidence of ARs to RBCs, FFP, and PCs per patient was 2.6%, 4.3%, and 13.2%, respectively-almost 3-fold higher. Most RBC-ARs were febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions and allergic reactions, whereas most FFP-ARs and PC-ARs were allergic reactions. Conclusions: The incidence of ARs per transfused patient may reflect better the potential risk of transfusion with blood components, taking into account the characteristics of the transfused patient.
AB - Objectives: To describe the frequency of adverse reactions (ARs) after transfusion on both per transfused patient and per transfused unit bases. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of data available from records of 6 hospitals on the total number of transfusions and documented ARs between January 2008 and December 2009 for RBCs, fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), and platelet concentrates (PCs). Results: The incidence of ARs to RBCs, FFP, and PCs per transfused unit was 0.6%, 1.3%, and 3.8%, respectively. The incidence of ARs to RBCs, FFP, and PCs per patient was 2.6%, 4.3%, and 13.2%, respectively-almost 3-fold higher. Most RBC-ARs were febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions and allergic reactions, whereas most FFP-ARs and PC-ARs were allergic reactions. Conclusions: The incidence of ARs per transfused patient may reflect better the potential risk of transfusion with blood components, taking into account the characteristics of the transfused patient.
KW - Adverse reactions
KW - Hemovigilance
KW - Per transfused patient basis
KW - Transfusion practices
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881218335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881218335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1309/AJCP6SBPOX0UWHEK
DO - 10.1309/AJCP6SBPOX0UWHEK
M3 - Article
C2 - 23897258
AN - SCOPUS:84881218335
SN - 0002-9173
VL - 140
SP - 219
EP - 224
JO - American Journal of Clinical Pathology
JF - American Journal of Clinical Pathology
IS - 2
ER -