Individual difference in pectoralis major muscle thickness and its effect on single-stage breast reconstruction using a tissue expander

Naohiro Ishii, Jiro Ando, Michiko Harao, Masaru Takemae, Kazuo Kishi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: In breast reconstruction using a tissue expander (TE), sufficient coverage of the TE with the pectoralis major (PM) muscle, particularly with a musculofascial flap, is highly important for avoiding postoperative complications. In patients in whom the PM is thin, intraoperative trauma often occurs, leading to troublesome repair. The present study aimed to investigate the usefulness of preoperative measurement of PM thickness in planning of breast reconstruction using a TE. Methods: In this case–control study, we identified 68 patients (70 breasts) with mammary carcinoma treated with simple mastectomy and TE insertion from April 2014 to December 2016. We measured average PM thickness at two specific points, sternocostal PM distance on the long axis and sternocostal PM area preoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging. Then, we analyzed the difference in PM thickness among individuals and its relationship to intraoperative trauma to the PM or surgical difficulty creating a muscular pocket (delicate PM). Results: Average PM thickness was significantly larger in younger patients (p = 0.046) and those with larger breasts (p < 0.01). In addition, average PM thickness on the affected side was significantly smaller in patients with delicate PM (12 breasts) (p < 0.01). PM thickness had a significant influence on delicate or firm PM (odds ratio 27.40; 95% confidence interval 2.01–372.00; p = 0.013). Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the usefulness of preoperative measurement of PM thickness in planning of breast reconstruction using a TE. Dissection should be performed more carefully in patients with average PM thickness less than 2.9 mm.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalBreast Cancer
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2017 May 31

Fingerprint

Tissue Expansion Devices
Pectoralis Muscles
Mammaplasty
Individuality
Breast
Simple Mastectomy
Wounds and Injuries
Dissection
Odds Ratio
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Confidence Intervals
Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Breast reconstruction
  • Muscle thickness
  • Musculofascial pocket
  • Pectoralis major muscle
  • Tissue expander

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Individual difference in pectoralis major muscle thickness and its effect on single-stage breast reconstruction using a tissue expander. / Ishii, Naohiro; Ando, Jiro; Harao, Michiko; Takemae, Masaru; Kishi, Kazuo.

In: Breast Cancer, 31.05.2017, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c508573107224ae6869a7fc1074fe8b1,
title = "Individual difference in pectoralis major muscle thickness and its effect on single-stage breast reconstruction using a tissue expander",
abstract = "Background: In breast reconstruction using a tissue expander (TE), sufficient coverage of the TE with the pectoralis major (PM) muscle, particularly with a musculofascial flap, is highly important for avoiding postoperative complications. In patients in whom the PM is thin, intraoperative trauma often occurs, leading to troublesome repair. The present study aimed to investigate the usefulness of preoperative measurement of PM thickness in planning of breast reconstruction using a TE. Methods: In this case–control study, we identified 68 patients (70 breasts) with mammary carcinoma treated with simple mastectomy and TE insertion from April 2014 to December 2016. We measured average PM thickness at two specific points, sternocostal PM distance on the long axis and sternocostal PM area preoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging. Then, we analyzed the difference in PM thickness among individuals and its relationship to intraoperative trauma to the PM or surgical difficulty creating a muscular pocket (delicate PM). Results: Average PM thickness was significantly larger in younger patients (p = 0.046) and those with larger breasts (p < 0.01). In addition, average PM thickness on the affected side was significantly smaller in patients with delicate PM (12 breasts) (p < 0.01). PM thickness had a significant influence on delicate or firm PM (odds ratio 27.40; 95{\%} confidence interval 2.01–372.00; p = 0.013). Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the usefulness of preoperative measurement of PM thickness in planning of breast reconstruction using a TE. Dissection should be performed more carefully in patients with average PM thickness less than 2.9 mm.",
keywords = "Breast reconstruction, Muscle thickness, Musculofascial pocket, Pectoralis major muscle, Tissue expander",
author = "Naohiro Ishii and Jiro Ando and Michiko Harao and Masaru Takemae and Kazuo Kishi",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1007/s12282-017-0785-9",
language = "English",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Breast Cancer",
issn = "1340-6868",
publisher = "Springer Japan",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual difference in pectoralis major muscle thickness and its effect on single-stage breast reconstruction using a tissue expander

AU - Ishii, Naohiro

AU - Ando, Jiro

AU - Harao, Michiko

AU - Takemae, Masaru

AU - Kishi, Kazuo

PY - 2017/5/31

Y1 - 2017/5/31

N2 - Background: In breast reconstruction using a tissue expander (TE), sufficient coverage of the TE with the pectoralis major (PM) muscle, particularly with a musculofascial flap, is highly important for avoiding postoperative complications. In patients in whom the PM is thin, intraoperative trauma often occurs, leading to troublesome repair. The present study aimed to investigate the usefulness of preoperative measurement of PM thickness in planning of breast reconstruction using a TE. Methods: In this case–control study, we identified 68 patients (70 breasts) with mammary carcinoma treated with simple mastectomy and TE insertion from April 2014 to December 2016. We measured average PM thickness at two specific points, sternocostal PM distance on the long axis and sternocostal PM area preoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging. Then, we analyzed the difference in PM thickness among individuals and its relationship to intraoperative trauma to the PM or surgical difficulty creating a muscular pocket (delicate PM). Results: Average PM thickness was significantly larger in younger patients (p = 0.046) and those with larger breasts (p < 0.01). In addition, average PM thickness on the affected side was significantly smaller in patients with delicate PM (12 breasts) (p < 0.01). PM thickness had a significant influence on delicate or firm PM (odds ratio 27.40; 95% confidence interval 2.01–372.00; p = 0.013). Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the usefulness of preoperative measurement of PM thickness in planning of breast reconstruction using a TE. Dissection should be performed more carefully in patients with average PM thickness less than 2.9 mm.

AB - Background: In breast reconstruction using a tissue expander (TE), sufficient coverage of the TE with the pectoralis major (PM) muscle, particularly with a musculofascial flap, is highly important for avoiding postoperative complications. In patients in whom the PM is thin, intraoperative trauma often occurs, leading to troublesome repair. The present study aimed to investigate the usefulness of preoperative measurement of PM thickness in planning of breast reconstruction using a TE. Methods: In this case–control study, we identified 68 patients (70 breasts) with mammary carcinoma treated with simple mastectomy and TE insertion from April 2014 to December 2016. We measured average PM thickness at two specific points, sternocostal PM distance on the long axis and sternocostal PM area preoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging. Then, we analyzed the difference in PM thickness among individuals and its relationship to intraoperative trauma to the PM or surgical difficulty creating a muscular pocket (delicate PM). Results: Average PM thickness was significantly larger in younger patients (p = 0.046) and those with larger breasts (p < 0.01). In addition, average PM thickness on the affected side was significantly smaller in patients with delicate PM (12 breasts) (p < 0.01). PM thickness had a significant influence on delicate or firm PM (odds ratio 27.40; 95% confidence interval 2.01–372.00; p = 0.013). Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the usefulness of preoperative measurement of PM thickness in planning of breast reconstruction using a TE. Dissection should be performed more carefully in patients with average PM thickness less than 2.9 mm.

KW - Breast reconstruction

KW - Muscle thickness

KW - Musculofascial pocket

KW - Pectoralis major muscle

KW - Tissue expander

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020111830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020111830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12282-017-0785-9

DO - 10.1007/s12282-017-0785-9

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Breast Cancer

JF - Breast Cancer

SN - 1340-6868

ER -