Industrial policy cuts two ways: Evidence from cotton-spinning firms in Japan, 1956-1964

Kozo Kiyota, Tetsuji Okazaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A number of studies have revealed a negative effect of industrial policy on productivity growth. Is this because industrial policy fails to control the activities of firms or because it can effectively control them? This paper attempts to answer these questions, using firm-level data from the cotton-spinning industry in Japan for the period 1956-64. We determine that industrial policy cut two ways during this period. Industrial policy effectively controlled the output of cotton-spinning firms, which contributed to the establishment of a stable market structure during the period. On the flip side, such policy constrained the reallocation of resources from less productive large firms to more productive small firms. Combined with the negative productivity growth in large firms during this period, industrial policy resulted in negative productivity growth in the industry.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)587-609
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Law and Economics
Volume53
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Aug
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

industrial policy
agricultural product
Japan
firm
evidence
productivity
industry
Industrial policy
Cotton
market
Productivity growth
resources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Industrial policy cuts two ways : Evidence from cotton-spinning firms in Japan, 1956-1964. / Kiyota, Kozo; Okazaki, Tetsuji.

In: Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 53, No. 3, 08.2010, p. 587-609.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da86059e24564f038c50792c0c0f9982,
title = "Industrial policy cuts two ways: Evidence from cotton-spinning firms in Japan, 1956-1964",
abstract = "A number of studies have revealed a negative effect of industrial policy on productivity growth. Is this because industrial policy fails to control the activities of firms or because it can effectively control them? This paper attempts to answer these questions, using firm-level data from the cotton-spinning industry in Japan for the period 1956-64. We determine that industrial policy cut two ways during this period. Industrial policy effectively controlled the output of cotton-spinning firms, which contributed to the establishment of a stable market structure during the period. On the flip side, such policy constrained the reallocation of resources from less productive large firms to more productive small firms. Combined with the negative productivity growth in large firms during this period, industrial policy resulted in negative productivity growth in the industry.",
author = "Kozo Kiyota and Tetsuji Okazaki",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "587--609",
journal = "Journal of Law and Economics",
issn = "0022-2186",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Industrial policy cuts two ways

T2 - Evidence from cotton-spinning firms in Japan, 1956-1964

AU - Kiyota, Kozo

AU - Okazaki, Tetsuji

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - A number of studies have revealed a negative effect of industrial policy on productivity growth. Is this because industrial policy fails to control the activities of firms or because it can effectively control them? This paper attempts to answer these questions, using firm-level data from the cotton-spinning industry in Japan for the period 1956-64. We determine that industrial policy cut two ways during this period. Industrial policy effectively controlled the output of cotton-spinning firms, which contributed to the establishment of a stable market structure during the period. On the flip side, such policy constrained the reallocation of resources from less productive large firms to more productive small firms. Combined with the negative productivity growth in large firms during this period, industrial policy resulted in negative productivity growth in the industry.

AB - A number of studies have revealed a negative effect of industrial policy on productivity growth. Is this because industrial policy fails to control the activities of firms or because it can effectively control them? This paper attempts to answer these questions, using firm-level data from the cotton-spinning industry in Japan for the period 1956-64. We determine that industrial policy cut two ways during this period. Industrial policy effectively controlled the output of cotton-spinning firms, which contributed to the establishment of a stable market structure during the period. On the flip side, such policy constrained the reallocation of resources from less productive large firms to more productive small firms. Combined with the negative productivity growth in large firms during this period, industrial policy resulted in negative productivity growth in the industry.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954471839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954471839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79954471839

VL - 53

SP - 587

EP - 609

JO - Journal of Law and Economics

JF - Journal of Law and Economics

SN - 0022-2186

IS - 3

ER -