TY - JOUR
T1 - Informed consent for anesthesia
T2 - Survey of current practices in Japan
AU - Sakaguchi, Misa
AU - Maeda, Shoichi
PY - 2005/11
Y1 - 2005/11
N2 - Anesthesia requires informed consent because it is an invasive procedure with certain risks. However, the state of informed consent for anesthesia in Japan remains unclear. The purpose of this survey was to examine the state of informed consent for anesthesia in Japan. A questionnaire was sent to all hospitals certified by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (n = 854). The questionnaire consisted of four sections: explanation of the anesthesia, method of documentation, consent for anesthesia, and other information such as the hospital's size. A total of 504 (59.0%) questionnaires were completed and returned. At 96.7% of hospitals, an anesthesiologist would explain the scheduled anesthesia. Most departments provide an explanation of dental damage, malignant hyperthermia, and nausea/vomiting. Explanation of anesthesia was standardized at 59.0% of hospitals. A written description was handed out to patients routinely at 61.3% of hospitals. Although consent for anesthesia was obtained at more than 90% of departments, only 59.9% of departments would keep records of having obtained consent. This survey found that the explanation of anesthesia varied among hospitals and was not standardized in Japan. Further attention is needed on how to improve the documentation of informed consent.
AB - Anesthesia requires informed consent because it is an invasive procedure with certain risks. However, the state of informed consent for anesthesia in Japan remains unclear. The purpose of this survey was to examine the state of informed consent for anesthesia in Japan. A questionnaire was sent to all hospitals certified by the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (n = 854). The questionnaire consisted of four sections: explanation of the anesthesia, method of documentation, consent for anesthesia, and other information such as the hospital's size. A total of 504 (59.0%) questionnaires were completed and returned. At 96.7% of hospitals, an anesthesiologist would explain the scheduled anesthesia. Most departments provide an explanation of dental damage, malignant hyperthermia, and nausea/vomiting. Explanation of anesthesia was standardized at 59.0% of hospitals. A written description was handed out to patients routinely at 61.3% of hospitals. Although consent for anesthesia was obtained at more than 90% of departments, only 59.9% of departments would keep records of having obtained consent. This survey found that the explanation of anesthesia varied among hospitals and was not standardized in Japan. Further attention is needed on how to improve the documentation of informed consent.
KW - Anesthesia
KW - Consent form
KW - Informed consent
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27944467202&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27944467202&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00540-005-0332-2
DO - 10.1007/s00540-005-0332-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 16261470
AN - SCOPUS:27944467202
SN - 0913-8668
VL - 19
SP - 315
EP - 319
JO - Journal of Anesthesia
JF - Journal of Anesthesia
IS - 4
ER -