TY - JOUR
T1 - Inhibitory effect of erythromycin on potassium currents in rat ventricular myocytes in comparison with disopyramide
AU - Hanada, Erika
AU - Ohtani, Hisakazu
AU - Hirota, Michiko
AU - Uemura, Noriko
AU - Nakaya, Haruaki
AU - Kotaki, Hajime
AU - Sato, Hitoshi
AU - Yamada, Yasuhiko
AU - Iga, Tatsuji
PY - 2003/7/1
Y1 - 2003/7/1
N2 - Disopyramide, a class la antiarrhythmic agent, has been reported to induce torsades de pointes (TdP) associated with excessive QT prolongation in electrocardiogram (ECG), especially when concomitantly administered with erythromycin, a macrolide antibiotic agent. In this study, we have evaluated the effects of erythromycin on action potential duration (APD) and potassium currents in rat ventricular myocytes in comparison with disopyramide. We have evaluated the relationship between in-vitro potassium current inhibition and in-vivo QT prolongation observed in a previous study. Action potentials and membrane potassium currents, including delayed rectifier current (IK) and transient outward current (Ito), were recorded using a whole-cell patch clamp method in enzymatically-dissociated ventricular cells. Erythromycin and disopyramide prolonged APD in a concentration-dependent manner. Disopyramide (10-100 μM) and erythromycin (100 μM) led to increases in the APD at 90% repolarization level. Disopyramide reduced IK (IC50 = 37.2 ± 0.17 μM) and Ito (IC50 = 20.9 ± 0.13 μM) while erythromycin reduced IK (IC50 = 60.1 ± 0.29 μM) but not Ito. The observed prolongation of APD might be ascribed to the inhibition of potassium currents. Erythromycin produced the prolongation of APD and the inhibition of potassium currents with a lag time after addition of the drugs, which suggested that erythromycin might not reach potassium channels from outside the ventricular cells. The potency of disopyramide was almost equivalent under in-vitro and in-vivo conditions. However, potency of erythromycin in-vitro was far weaker than that in-vivo reported in a previous study, presumably due to a difference in the uptake of erythromycin into ventricular myocytes between in-vivo and in-vitro conditions. Therefore, when drug-induced risks of QT prolongation are to be evaluated, the difference of potencies between in-vitro and in-vivo should be taken into consideration.
AB - Disopyramide, a class la antiarrhythmic agent, has been reported to induce torsades de pointes (TdP) associated with excessive QT prolongation in electrocardiogram (ECG), especially when concomitantly administered with erythromycin, a macrolide antibiotic agent. In this study, we have evaluated the effects of erythromycin on action potential duration (APD) and potassium currents in rat ventricular myocytes in comparison with disopyramide. We have evaluated the relationship between in-vitro potassium current inhibition and in-vivo QT prolongation observed in a previous study. Action potentials and membrane potassium currents, including delayed rectifier current (IK) and transient outward current (Ito), were recorded using a whole-cell patch clamp method in enzymatically-dissociated ventricular cells. Erythromycin and disopyramide prolonged APD in a concentration-dependent manner. Disopyramide (10-100 μM) and erythromycin (100 μM) led to increases in the APD at 90% repolarization level. Disopyramide reduced IK (IC50 = 37.2 ± 0.17 μM) and Ito (IC50 = 20.9 ± 0.13 μM) while erythromycin reduced IK (IC50 = 60.1 ± 0.29 μM) but not Ito. The observed prolongation of APD might be ascribed to the inhibition of potassium currents. Erythromycin produced the prolongation of APD and the inhibition of potassium currents with a lag time after addition of the drugs, which suggested that erythromycin might not reach potassium channels from outside the ventricular cells. The potency of disopyramide was almost equivalent under in-vitro and in-vivo conditions. However, potency of erythromycin in-vitro was far weaker than that in-vivo reported in a previous study, presumably due to a difference in the uptake of erythromycin into ventricular myocytes between in-vivo and in-vitro conditions. Therefore, when drug-induced risks of QT prolongation are to be evaluated, the difference of potencies between in-vitro and in-vivo should be taken into consideration.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041664962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041664962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1211/0022357021459
DO - 10.1211/0022357021459
M3 - Article
C2 - 12906757
AN - SCOPUS:0041664962
SN - 0022-3573
VL - 55
SP - 995
EP - 1002
JO - Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
JF - Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
IS - 7
ER -