International Comparison of Abdominal Fat Distribution among Four Populations

The ERA-JUMP Study

Sayaka Kadowaki, Katsuyuki Miura, Takashi Kadowaki, Akira Fujiyoshi, Aiman El-Saed, Kamal H. Masaki, Tomonori Okamura, Daniel Edmundowicz, Beatriz L. Rodriguez, Yasuyuki Nakamura, Emma J.M. Barinas-Mitchell, Aya Kadota, Bradley J. Willcox, Robert D. Abbott, Lewis H. Kuller, Jina Choo, Chol Shin, Hirotsugu Ueshima, Akira Sekikawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Abdominal fat distribution varies across groups with different races or environments. Whether environmental factors, apart from racial differences, affect abdominal fat distribution is unknown. Methods: We compared the abdominal fat distribution of four groups; different races with similar environments (Caucasians vs. Japanese Americans), different environments with an identical race (Japanese Americans vs. Japanese), and similar races with similar environments (Japanese vs. Koreans). A population-based sample of 1212 men aged 40-49 were analyzed: 307 Caucasians and 300 Japanese Americans in the United States, 310 Japanese in Japan, and 295 Koreans in Korea. We compared the proportion of visceral adipose tissue area to total abdominal adipose tissue area (VAT%) and other factors that can affect abdominal fat distribution (smoking, alcohol use, physical activity levels, and metabolic factors). Results: VAT% was significantly higher in Japanese and Koreans than in Japanese Americans and Caucasians (50.0, 48.5, 43.2, 41.0%, respectively, P < 0.001). Even after adjustment for possible confounders, the significant VAT% difference remained in comparing groups with identical race but different environments (i.e., Japanese vs. Japanese Americans). In contrast, comparing groups with different races but similar environments (i.e., Caucasians vs. Japanese Americans), VAT% was not significantly different. Comparing groups with similar races and similar environments (i.e., Japanese vs. Koreans), VAT% did not significantly differ. Conclusions: Environmental differences, apart from racial differences, affect the difference in abdominal fat distribution across different groups in middle-aged men.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)166-173
Number of pages8
JournalMetabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 May 1

Fingerprint

Abdominal Fat
Asian Americans
Population
Intra-Abdominal Fat
Korea
Japan
Smoking
Alcohols
Exercise

Keywords

  • cross-sectional study
  • epidemiology
  • international study
  • subcutaneous adipose tissue
  • Visceral adipose tissue

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Kadowaki, S., Miura, K., Kadowaki, T., Fujiyoshi, A., El-Saed, A., Masaki, K. H., ... Sekikawa, A. (2018). International Comparison of Abdominal Fat Distribution among Four Populations: The ERA-JUMP Study. Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders, 16(4), 166-173. https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2017.0132

International Comparison of Abdominal Fat Distribution among Four Populations : The ERA-JUMP Study. / Kadowaki, Sayaka; Miura, Katsuyuki; Kadowaki, Takashi; Fujiyoshi, Akira; El-Saed, Aiman; Masaki, Kamal H.; Okamura, Tomonori; Edmundowicz, Daniel; Rodriguez, Beatriz L.; Nakamura, Yasuyuki; Barinas-Mitchell, Emma J.M.; Kadota, Aya; Willcox, Bradley J.; Abbott, Robert D.; Kuller, Lewis H.; Choo, Jina; Shin, Chol; Ueshima, Hirotsugu; Sekikawa, Akira.

In: Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders, Vol. 16, No. 4, 01.05.2018, p. 166-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kadowaki, S, Miura, K, Kadowaki, T, Fujiyoshi, A, El-Saed, A, Masaki, KH, Okamura, T, Edmundowicz, D, Rodriguez, BL, Nakamura, Y, Barinas-Mitchell, EJM, Kadota, A, Willcox, BJ, Abbott, RD, Kuller, LH, Choo, J, Shin, C, Ueshima, H & Sekikawa, A 2018, 'International Comparison of Abdominal Fat Distribution among Four Populations: The ERA-JUMP Study', Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 166-173. https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2017.0132
Kadowaki, Sayaka ; Miura, Katsuyuki ; Kadowaki, Takashi ; Fujiyoshi, Akira ; El-Saed, Aiman ; Masaki, Kamal H. ; Okamura, Tomonori ; Edmundowicz, Daniel ; Rodriguez, Beatriz L. ; Nakamura, Yasuyuki ; Barinas-Mitchell, Emma J.M. ; Kadota, Aya ; Willcox, Bradley J. ; Abbott, Robert D. ; Kuller, Lewis H. ; Choo, Jina ; Shin, Chol ; Ueshima, Hirotsugu ; Sekikawa, Akira. / International Comparison of Abdominal Fat Distribution among Four Populations : The ERA-JUMP Study. In: Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders. 2018 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 166-173.
@article{fa5028f0af4f4a73bf87f93c55dd781d,
title = "International Comparison of Abdominal Fat Distribution among Four Populations: The ERA-JUMP Study",
abstract = "Background: Abdominal fat distribution varies across groups with different races or environments. Whether environmental factors, apart from racial differences, affect abdominal fat distribution is unknown. Methods: We compared the abdominal fat distribution of four groups; different races with similar environments (Caucasians vs. Japanese Americans), different environments with an identical race (Japanese Americans vs. Japanese), and similar races with similar environments (Japanese vs. Koreans). A population-based sample of 1212 men aged 40-49 were analyzed: 307 Caucasians and 300 Japanese Americans in the United States, 310 Japanese in Japan, and 295 Koreans in Korea. We compared the proportion of visceral adipose tissue area to total abdominal adipose tissue area (VAT{\%}) and other factors that can affect abdominal fat distribution (smoking, alcohol use, physical activity levels, and metabolic factors). Results: VAT{\%} was significantly higher in Japanese and Koreans than in Japanese Americans and Caucasians (50.0, 48.5, 43.2, 41.0{\%}, respectively, P < 0.001). Even after adjustment for possible confounders, the significant VAT{\%} difference remained in comparing groups with identical race but different environments (i.e., Japanese vs. Japanese Americans). In contrast, comparing groups with different races but similar environments (i.e., Caucasians vs. Japanese Americans), VAT{\%} was not significantly different. Comparing groups with similar races and similar environments (i.e., Japanese vs. Koreans), VAT{\%} did not significantly differ. Conclusions: Environmental differences, apart from racial differences, affect the difference in abdominal fat distribution across different groups in middle-aged men.",
keywords = "cross-sectional study, epidemiology, international study, subcutaneous adipose tissue, Visceral adipose tissue",
author = "Sayaka Kadowaki and Katsuyuki Miura and Takashi Kadowaki and Akira Fujiyoshi and Aiman El-Saed and Masaki, {Kamal H.} and Tomonori Okamura and Daniel Edmundowicz and Rodriguez, {Beatriz L.} and Yasuyuki Nakamura and Barinas-Mitchell, {Emma J.M.} and Aya Kadota and Willcox, {Bradley J.} and Abbott, {Robert D.} and Kuller, {Lewis H.} and Jina Choo and Chol Shin and Hirotsugu Ueshima and Akira Sekikawa",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/met.2017.0132",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "166--173",
journal = "Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders",
issn = "1540-4196",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - International Comparison of Abdominal Fat Distribution among Four Populations

T2 - The ERA-JUMP Study

AU - Kadowaki, Sayaka

AU - Miura, Katsuyuki

AU - Kadowaki, Takashi

AU - Fujiyoshi, Akira

AU - El-Saed, Aiman

AU - Masaki, Kamal H.

AU - Okamura, Tomonori

AU - Edmundowicz, Daniel

AU - Rodriguez, Beatriz L.

AU - Nakamura, Yasuyuki

AU - Barinas-Mitchell, Emma J.M.

AU - Kadota, Aya

AU - Willcox, Bradley J.

AU - Abbott, Robert D.

AU - Kuller, Lewis H.

AU - Choo, Jina

AU - Shin, Chol

AU - Ueshima, Hirotsugu

AU - Sekikawa, Akira

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Background: Abdominal fat distribution varies across groups with different races or environments. Whether environmental factors, apart from racial differences, affect abdominal fat distribution is unknown. Methods: We compared the abdominal fat distribution of four groups; different races with similar environments (Caucasians vs. Japanese Americans), different environments with an identical race (Japanese Americans vs. Japanese), and similar races with similar environments (Japanese vs. Koreans). A population-based sample of 1212 men aged 40-49 were analyzed: 307 Caucasians and 300 Japanese Americans in the United States, 310 Japanese in Japan, and 295 Koreans in Korea. We compared the proportion of visceral adipose tissue area to total abdominal adipose tissue area (VAT%) and other factors that can affect abdominal fat distribution (smoking, alcohol use, physical activity levels, and metabolic factors). Results: VAT% was significantly higher in Japanese and Koreans than in Japanese Americans and Caucasians (50.0, 48.5, 43.2, 41.0%, respectively, P < 0.001). Even after adjustment for possible confounders, the significant VAT% difference remained in comparing groups with identical race but different environments (i.e., Japanese vs. Japanese Americans). In contrast, comparing groups with different races but similar environments (i.e., Caucasians vs. Japanese Americans), VAT% was not significantly different. Comparing groups with similar races and similar environments (i.e., Japanese vs. Koreans), VAT% did not significantly differ. Conclusions: Environmental differences, apart from racial differences, affect the difference in abdominal fat distribution across different groups in middle-aged men.

AB - Background: Abdominal fat distribution varies across groups with different races or environments. Whether environmental factors, apart from racial differences, affect abdominal fat distribution is unknown. Methods: We compared the abdominal fat distribution of four groups; different races with similar environments (Caucasians vs. Japanese Americans), different environments with an identical race (Japanese Americans vs. Japanese), and similar races with similar environments (Japanese vs. Koreans). A population-based sample of 1212 men aged 40-49 were analyzed: 307 Caucasians and 300 Japanese Americans in the United States, 310 Japanese in Japan, and 295 Koreans in Korea. We compared the proportion of visceral adipose tissue area to total abdominal adipose tissue area (VAT%) and other factors that can affect abdominal fat distribution (smoking, alcohol use, physical activity levels, and metabolic factors). Results: VAT% was significantly higher in Japanese and Koreans than in Japanese Americans and Caucasians (50.0, 48.5, 43.2, 41.0%, respectively, P < 0.001). Even after adjustment for possible confounders, the significant VAT% difference remained in comparing groups with identical race but different environments (i.e., Japanese vs. Japanese Americans). In contrast, comparing groups with different races but similar environments (i.e., Caucasians vs. Japanese Americans), VAT% was not significantly different. Comparing groups with similar races and similar environments (i.e., Japanese vs. Koreans), VAT% did not significantly differ. Conclusions: Environmental differences, apart from racial differences, affect the difference in abdominal fat distribution across different groups in middle-aged men.

KW - cross-sectional study

KW - epidemiology

KW - international study

KW - subcutaneous adipose tissue

KW - Visceral adipose tissue

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046372974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046372974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/met.2017.0132

DO - 10.1089/met.2017.0132

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 166

EP - 173

JO - Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders

JF - Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders

SN - 1540-4196

IS - 4

ER -