International production/distribution networks and Indonesia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines the industrialization performance of Indonesia through a comparative evaluation with other East Asian economies. While neighboring countries actively formulated international production/distribution networks, Indonesia fell behind in utilizing the benefits of globalizing corporate activities. International production/distribution networks are supported by new economic thought such as fragmentation, agglomeration, and theories about corporate firm; and a policy package of development strategies should be designed to utilize such opportunities. The design of Indonesia's development strategies and "institutions," however, does not conform to the globalizing world because the presence of network-forming foreign companies is not large enough to make them influential "actors." This author argues that the traditional comparative advantage argument for Indonesia's economic development is possibly misleading. Rather, Indonesia must learn the experience of its neighboring countries and introduce foreign companies as new actors to break the old "structure".

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-38
Number of pages22
JournalDeveloping Economies
Volume43
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2005 Mar

Fingerprint

development strategy
Indonesia
comparative advantage
foreign company
agglomeration
industrialization
neighboring countries
fragmentation
economic development
economics
agglomeration area
distribution
Distribution network
firm
economy
evaluation
performance
experience
world
policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Development

Cite this

International production/distribution networks and Indonesia. / Kimura, Fukunari.

In: Developing Economies, Vol. 43, No. 1, 03.2005, p. 17-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a6df022038a4e93b5f824ee039a784c,
title = "International production/distribution networks and Indonesia",
abstract = "This study examines the industrialization performance of Indonesia through a comparative evaluation with other East Asian economies. While neighboring countries actively formulated international production/distribution networks, Indonesia fell behind in utilizing the benefits of globalizing corporate activities. International production/distribution networks are supported by new economic thought such as fragmentation, agglomeration, and theories about corporate firm; and a policy package of development strategies should be designed to utilize such opportunities. The design of Indonesia's development strategies and {"}institutions,{"} however, does not conform to the globalizing world because the presence of network-forming foreign companies is not large enough to make them influential {"}actors.{"} This author argues that the traditional comparative advantage argument for Indonesia's economic development is possibly misleading. Rather, Indonesia must learn the experience of its neighboring countries and introduce foreign companies as new actors to break the old {"}structure{"}.",
author = "Fukunari Kimura",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "17--38",
journal = "Developing Economies",
issn = "0012-1533",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - International production/distribution networks and Indonesia

AU - Kimura, Fukunari

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - This study examines the industrialization performance of Indonesia through a comparative evaluation with other East Asian economies. While neighboring countries actively formulated international production/distribution networks, Indonesia fell behind in utilizing the benefits of globalizing corporate activities. International production/distribution networks are supported by new economic thought such as fragmentation, agglomeration, and theories about corporate firm; and a policy package of development strategies should be designed to utilize such opportunities. The design of Indonesia's development strategies and "institutions," however, does not conform to the globalizing world because the presence of network-forming foreign companies is not large enough to make them influential "actors." This author argues that the traditional comparative advantage argument for Indonesia's economic development is possibly misleading. Rather, Indonesia must learn the experience of its neighboring countries and introduce foreign companies as new actors to break the old "structure".

AB - This study examines the industrialization performance of Indonesia through a comparative evaluation with other East Asian economies. While neighboring countries actively formulated international production/distribution networks, Indonesia fell behind in utilizing the benefits of globalizing corporate activities. International production/distribution networks are supported by new economic thought such as fragmentation, agglomeration, and theories about corporate firm; and a policy package of development strategies should be designed to utilize such opportunities. The design of Indonesia's development strategies and "institutions," however, does not conform to the globalizing world because the presence of network-forming foreign companies is not large enough to make them influential "actors." This author argues that the traditional comparative advantage argument for Indonesia's economic development is possibly misleading. Rather, Indonesia must learn the experience of its neighboring countries and introduce foreign companies as new actors to break the old "structure".

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15844388055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15844388055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:15844388055

VL - 43

SP - 17

EP - 38

JO - Developing Economies

JF - Developing Economies

SN - 0012-1533

IS - 1

ER -