Abstract
Two districts with divergent productivity levels engage in policy-making on the provision of local public goods that enhance future income and hence create a dynamic linkage across periods. The policy choices of district representatives are derived under alternative fiscal systems, and the relative merits of the systems are evaluated. It is predicted that a decentralized system is more likely to be selected in a more equal society. On the other hand, when a great deal of benefit spills over from a local public good, or when policy makers are expected to care solely about the immediate effects of their decisions on their districts, a centralized system is more likely to be selected.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 383-409 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | Journal of Public Economic Theory |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2009 Jun |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics