Intramuscular temperature modulates glutamate-evoked masseter muscle pain intensity in humans

Hitoshi Sato, Eduardo E. Castrillon, Brian E. Cairns, Karina H. Bendixen, Kelun Wang, Taneaki Nakagawa, Koichi Wajima, Peter Svensson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIMS: To determine whether glutamate-evoked jaw muscle pain is altered by the temperature of the solution injected.

METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers participated and received injections of hot (48°C), neutral (36°C), or cold (3°C) solutions (0.5 mL) of glutamate or isotonic saline into the masseter muscle. Pain intensity was assessed with an electronic visual analog scale (eVAS). Numeric rating scale (NRS) scores of unpleasantness and temperature perception, pain-drawing areas, and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were also measured. Participants filled out the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Two-way or three-way repeated measures ANOVA were used for data analyses.

RESULTS: Injection of hot glutamate and cold glutamate solutions significantly increased and decreased, respectively, the peak pain intensity compared with injection of neutral glutamate solution. The duration of glutamate-evoked pain was significantly longer when hot glutamate was injected than when cold glutamate was injected. No significant effect of temperature on pain intensity was observed when isotonic saline was injected. No effect of solution temperature was detected on unpleasantness, heat perception, cold perception, area of pain drawings, or PPTs. There was a significantly greater use of the "numb" term in the MPQ to describe the injection of cold solutions compared to the injection of both neutral and hot solutions.

CONCLUSION: Glutamate-evoked jaw muscle pain was significantly altered by the temperature of the injection solution. Although temperature perception in the jaw muscle is poor, pain intensity is increased when the muscle tissue temperature is elevated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)158-167
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of oral & facial pain and headache
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Masseter Muscle
Myalgia
Glutamic Acid
Temperature
Injections
Pain
Jaw
Pain Perception
Pain Threshold
Pain Measurement
Pressure
Muscles
Visual Analog Scale
Analysis of Variance
Healthy Volunteers
Hot Temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Intramuscular temperature modulates glutamate-evoked masseter muscle pain intensity in humans. / Sato, Hitoshi; Castrillon, Eduardo E.; Cairns, Brian E.; Bendixen, Karina H.; Wang, Kelun; Nakagawa, Taneaki; Wajima, Koichi; Svensson, Peter.

In: Journal of oral & facial pain and headache, Vol. 29, No. 2, 01.03.2015, p. 158-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sato, H, Castrillon, EE, Cairns, BE, Bendixen, KH, Wang, K, Nakagawa, T, Wajima, K & Svensson, P 2015, 'Intramuscular temperature modulates glutamate-evoked masseter muscle pain intensity in humans', Journal of oral & facial pain and headache, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 158-167. https://doi.org/10.11607/ofph.1332
Sato, Hitoshi ; Castrillon, Eduardo E. ; Cairns, Brian E. ; Bendixen, Karina H. ; Wang, Kelun ; Nakagawa, Taneaki ; Wajima, Koichi ; Svensson, Peter. / Intramuscular temperature modulates glutamate-evoked masseter muscle pain intensity in humans. In: Journal of oral & facial pain and headache. 2015 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 158-167.
@article{b5937732a1aa4a6d990046a5f5b98c4e,
title = "Intramuscular temperature modulates glutamate-evoked masseter muscle pain intensity in humans",
abstract = "AIMS: To determine whether glutamate-evoked jaw muscle pain is altered by the temperature of the solution injected.METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers participated and received injections of hot (48°C), neutral (36°C), or cold (3°C) solutions (0.5 mL) of glutamate or isotonic saline into the masseter muscle. Pain intensity was assessed with an electronic visual analog scale (eVAS). Numeric rating scale (NRS) scores of unpleasantness and temperature perception, pain-drawing areas, and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were also measured. Participants filled out the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Two-way or three-way repeated measures ANOVA were used for data analyses.RESULTS: Injection of hot glutamate and cold glutamate solutions significantly increased and decreased, respectively, the peak pain intensity compared with injection of neutral glutamate solution. The duration of glutamate-evoked pain was significantly longer when hot glutamate was injected than when cold glutamate was injected. No significant effect of temperature on pain intensity was observed when isotonic saline was injected. No effect of solution temperature was detected on unpleasantness, heat perception, cold perception, area of pain drawings, or PPTs. There was a significantly greater use of the {"}numb{"} term in the MPQ to describe the injection of cold solutions compared to the injection of both neutral and hot solutions.CONCLUSION: Glutamate-evoked jaw muscle pain was significantly altered by the temperature of the injection solution. Although temperature perception in the jaw muscle is poor, pain intensity is increased when the muscle tissue temperature is elevated.",
author = "Hitoshi Sato and Castrillon, {Eduardo E.} and Cairns, {Brian E.} and Bendixen, {Karina H.} and Kelun Wang and Taneaki Nakagawa and Koichi Wajima and Peter Svensson",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.11607/ofph.1332",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "158--167",
journal = "Journal of Oral and Facial Pain and Headache",
issn = "2333-0384",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intramuscular temperature modulates glutamate-evoked masseter muscle pain intensity in humans

AU - Sato, Hitoshi

AU - Castrillon, Eduardo E.

AU - Cairns, Brian E.

AU - Bendixen, Karina H.

AU - Wang, Kelun

AU - Nakagawa, Taneaki

AU - Wajima, Koichi

AU - Svensson, Peter

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - AIMS: To determine whether glutamate-evoked jaw muscle pain is altered by the temperature of the solution injected.METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers participated and received injections of hot (48°C), neutral (36°C), or cold (3°C) solutions (0.5 mL) of glutamate or isotonic saline into the masseter muscle. Pain intensity was assessed with an electronic visual analog scale (eVAS). Numeric rating scale (NRS) scores of unpleasantness and temperature perception, pain-drawing areas, and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were also measured. Participants filled out the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Two-way or three-way repeated measures ANOVA were used for data analyses.RESULTS: Injection of hot glutamate and cold glutamate solutions significantly increased and decreased, respectively, the peak pain intensity compared with injection of neutral glutamate solution. The duration of glutamate-evoked pain was significantly longer when hot glutamate was injected than when cold glutamate was injected. No significant effect of temperature on pain intensity was observed when isotonic saline was injected. No effect of solution temperature was detected on unpleasantness, heat perception, cold perception, area of pain drawings, or PPTs. There was a significantly greater use of the "numb" term in the MPQ to describe the injection of cold solutions compared to the injection of both neutral and hot solutions.CONCLUSION: Glutamate-evoked jaw muscle pain was significantly altered by the temperature of the injection solution. Although temperature perception in the jaw muscle is poor, pain intensity is increased when the muscle tissue temperature is elevated.

AB - AIMS: To determine whether glutamate-evoked jaw muscle pain is altered by the temperature of the solution injected.METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers participated and received injections of hot (48°C), neutral (36°C), or cold (3°C) solutions (0.5 mL) of glutamate or isotonic saline into the masseter muscle. Pain intensity was assessed with an electronic visual analog scale (eVAS). Numeric rating scale (NRS) scores of unpleasantness and temperature perception, pain-drawing areas, and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were also measured. Participants filled out the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Two-way or three-way repeated measures ANOVA were used for data analyses.RESULTS: Injection of hot glutamate and cold glutamate solutions significantly increased and decreased, respectively, the peak pain intensity compared with injection of neutral glutamate solution. The duration of glutamate-evoked pain was significantly longer when hot glutamate was injected than when cold glutamate was injected. No significant effect of temperature on pain intensity was observed when isotonic saline was injected. No effect of solution temperature was detected on unpleasantness, heat perception, cold perception, area of pain drawings, or PPTs. There was a significantly greater use of the "numb" term in the MPQ to describe the injection of cold solutions compared to the injection of both neutral and hot solutions.CONCLUSION: Glutamate-evoked jaw muscle pain was significantly altered by the temperature of the injection solution. Although temperature perception in the jaw muscle is poor, pain intensity is increased when the muscle tissue temperature is elevated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936741993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84936741993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.11607/ofph.1332

DO - 10.11607/ofph.1332

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 158

EP - 167

JO - Journal of Oral and Facial Pain and Headache

JF - Journal of Oral and Facial Pain and Headache

SN - 2333-0384

IS - 2

ER -