Involvement of the sphenosquamosal suture for unilateral coronal synostosis

Yoshiaki Sakamoto, Hideo Nakajima, Ikkei Tamada, Junpei Miyamoto, Kazuo Kishi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The etiology of the clinical entity commonly known as unilateral coronal synostosis is often described as the unilateral fusion of the coronal ring. However, recent theories have poorly explained the basis of the deformities associated with unilateral coronal synostosis. We retrospectively analyzed computed tomographic data sets from 18 patients who presented with unilateral coronal synostosis and arrived at our hospital between 1985 and 2010. Using three-dimensional reconstructions of the computed tomographic images, analyses of the cranial base and measurements of each cranial bone were performed. As a result, the ipsilateral and contralateral basion-clinoid-pterion angles did not differ significantly (P = 0.49) and were almost identical in each case. However, the ipsilateral basion-partis-petrosae anglewas wider than the corresponding contralateral angle (P < 0.001). In addition, the ipsilateral nasion-clinoid-pterion angle and the sphenoid, zygomatic, and temporal bones on the ipsilateral side were significantly shorter than those on the contralateral side (P < 0.001). Based on a shortening ratio, the sphenoid bone was smaller (42.0% T 10.9%) than the temporal (68.9% ± 7.58%) and zygomatic bones (71.1% ± 8.38%). This difference was significant (P < 0.001). In conclusion, restricted growth potential of the central portion of the ipsilateral sphenoid bone was identified. We propose that the coronal ring, which includes the frontoparietal and frontosphenoidal sutures, and the sphenosquamosal suture are involved in unilateral coronal synostosis. Using our findings and the theory of Delashaw et al, the deformity observed in unilateral coronal synostosis can be explained more adequately and/or completely.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1267-1269
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Sep

Fingerprint

Craniosynostoses
Sutures
Sphenoid Bone
Bone and Bones
Temporal Bone
Skull Base
Growth

Keywords

  • Coronal ring
  • Plagiocephaly
  • Sphenosquamosal suture
  • Unilateral coronal synostosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Involvement of the sphenosquamosal suture for unilateral coronal synostosis. / Sakamoto, Yoshiaki; Nakajima, Hideo; Tamada, Ikkei; Miyamoto, Junpei; Kishi, Kazuo.

In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Vol. 23, No. 5, 09.2012, p. 1267-1269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sakamoto, Yoshiaki ; Nakajima, Hideo ; Tamada, Ikkei ; Miyamoto, Junpei ; Kishi, Kazuo. / Involvement of the sphenosquamosal suture for unilateral coronal synostosis. In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 23, No. 5. pp. 1267-1269.
@article{8d5d263d92e04c8d8ce7875d455541b2,
title = "Involvement of the sphenosquamosal suture for unilateral coronal synostosis",
abstract = "The etiology of the clinical entity commonly known as unilateral coronal synostosis is often described as the unilateral fusion of the coronal ring. However, recent theories have poorly explained the basis of the deformities associated with unilateral coronal synostosis. We retrospectively analyzed computed tomographic data sets from 18 patients who presented with unilateral coronal synostosis and arrived at our hospital between 1985 and 2010. Using three-dimensional reconstructions of the computed tomographic images, analyses of the cranial base and measurements of each cranial bone were performed. As a result, the ipsilateral and contralateral basion-clinoid-pterion angles did not differ significantly (P = 0.49) and were almost identical in each case. However, the ipsilateral basion-partis-petrosae anglewas wider than the corresponding contralateral angle (P < 0.001). In addition, the ipsilateral nasion-clinoid-pterion angle and the sphenoid, zygomatic, and temporal bones on the ipsilateral side were significantly shorter than those on the contralateral side (P < 0.001). Based on a shortening ratio, the sphenoid bone was smaller (42.0{\%} T 10.9{\%}) than the temporal (68.9{\%} ± 7.58{\%}) and zygomatic bones (71.1{\%} ± 8.38{\%}). This difference was significant (P < 0.001). In conclusion, restricted growth potential of the central portion of the ipsilateral sphenoid bone was identified. We propose that the coronal ring, which includes the frontoparietal and frontosphenoidal sutures, and the sphenosquamosal suture are involved in unilateral coronal synostosis. Using our findings and the theory of Delashaw et al, the deformity observed in unilateral coronal synostosis can be explained more adequately and/or completely.",
keywords = "Coronal ring, Plagiocephaly, Sphenosquamosal suture, Unilateral coronal synostosis",
author = "Yoshiaki Sakamoto and Hideo Nakajima and Ikkei Tamada and Junpei Miyamoto and Kazuo Kishi",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182519a97",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1267--1269",
journal = "Journal of Craniofacial Surgery",
issn = "1049-2275",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Involvement of the sphenosquamosal suture for unilateral coronal synostosis

AU - Sakamoto, Yoshiaki

AU - Nakajima, Hideo

AU - Tamada, Ikkei

AU - Miyamoto, Junpei

AU - Kishi, Kazuo

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - The etiology of the clinical entity commonly known as unilateral coronal synostosis is often described as the unilateral fusion of the coronal ring. However, recent theories have poorly explained the basis of the deformities associated with unilateral coronal synostosis. We retrospectively analyzed computed tomographic data sets from 18 patients who presented with unilateral coronal synostosis and arrived at our hospital between 1985 and 2010. Using three-dimensional reconstructions of the computed tomographic images, analyses of the cranial base and measurements of each cranial bone were performed. As a result, the ipsilateral and contralateral basion-clinoid-pterion angles did not differ significantly (P = 0.49) and were almost identical in each case. However, the ipsilateral basion-partis-petrosae anglewas wider than the corresponding contralateral angle (P < 0.001). In addition, the ipsilateral nasion-clinoid-pterion angle and the sphenoid, zygomatic, and temporal bones on the ipsilateral side were significantly shorter than those on the contralateral side (P < 0.001). Based on a shortening ratio, the sphenoid bone was smaller (42.0% T 10.9%) than the temporal (68.9% ± 7.58%) and zygomatic bones (71.1% ± 8.38%). This difference was significant (P < 0.001). In conclusion, restricted growth potential of the central portion of the ipsilateral sphenoid bone was identified. We propose that the coronal ring, which includes the frontoparietal and frontosphenoidal sutures, and the sphenosquamosal suture are involved in unilateral coronal synostosis. Using our findings and the theory of Delashaw et al, the deformity observed in unilateral coronal synostosis can be explained more adequately and/or completely.

AB - The etiology of the clinical entity commonly known as unilateral coronal synostosis is often described as the unilateral fusion of the coronal ring. However, recent theories have poorly explained the basis of the deformities associated with unilateral coronal synostosis. We retrospectively analyzed computed tomographic data sets from 18 patients who presented with unilateral coronal synostosis and arrived at our hospital between 1985 and 2010. Using three-dimensional reconstructions of the computed tomographic images, analyses of the cranial base and measurements of each cranial bone were performed. As a result, the ipsilateral and contralateral basion-clinoid-pterion angles did not differ significantly (P = 0.49) and were almost identical in each case. However, the ipsilateral basion-partis-petrosae anglewas wider than the corresponding contralateral angle (P < 0.001). In addition, the ipsilateral nasion-clinoid-pterion angle and the sphenoid, zygomatic, and temporal bones on the ipsilateral side were significantly shorter than those on the contralateral side (P < 0.001). Based on a shortening ratio, the sphenoid bone was smaller (42.0% T 10.9%) than the temporal (68.9% ± 7.58%) and zygomatic bones (71.1% ± 8.38%). This difference was significant (P < 0.001). In conclusion, restricted growth potential of the central portion of the ipsilateral sphenoid bone was identified. We propose that the coronal ring, which includes the frontoparietal and frontosphenoidal sutures, and the sphenosquamosal suture are involved in unilateral coronal synostosis. Using our findings and the theory of Delashaw et al, the deformity observed in unilateral coronal synostosis can be explained more adequately and/or completely.

KW - Coronal ring

KW - Plagiocephaly

KW - Sphenosquamosal suture

KW - Unilateral coronal synostosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867845703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867845703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182519a97

DO - 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182519a97

M3 - Article

C2 - 22948651

AN - SCOPUS:84867845703

VL - 23

SP - 1267

EP - 1269

JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

SN - 1049-2275

IS - 5

ER -