TY - JOUR
T1 - Iron-chelating agents never suppress Fenton reaction but participate in quenching spin-trapped radicals
AU - Li, Linxiang
AU - Abe, Yoshihiro
AU - Kanagawa, Kiyotada
AU - Shoji, Tomoko
AU - Mashino, Tadahiko
AU - Mochizuki, Masataka
AU - Tanaka, Miho
AU - Miyata, Naoki
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is supported by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Education and Science, Japan.
PY - 2007/9/19
Y1 - 2007/9/19
N2 - Hydroxyl radical formation by Fenton reaction in the presence of an iron-chelating agent such as EDTA was traced by two different assay methods; an electron spin resonance (ESR) spin-trapping method with 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO), and high Performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-fluorescence detection with terephthalic acid (TPA), a fluorescent probe for hydroxyl radicals. From the ESR spin-trapping measurement, it was observed that EDTA seemed to suppress hydroxyl radical formation with the increase of its concentration. On the other hand, hydroxyl radical formation by Fenton reaction was not affected by EDTA monitored by HPLC assay. Similar inconsistent effects of other iron-chelating agents such as nitrylotriacetic acid (NTA), diethylenetriamine penta acetic acid (DTPA), oxalate and citrate were also observed. On the addition of EDTA solution to the reaction mixture 10 min after the Fenton reaction started, when hydroxyl radical formation should have almost ceased but the ESR signal of DMPO-OH radicals could be detected, it was observed that the DMPO-OH{radical dot} signal disappeared rapidly. With the simultaneous addition of Fe(II) solution and EDTA after the Fenton reaction ceased, the DMPO-OH{radical dot} signal disappeared more rapidly. The results indicated that these chelating agents should enhance the quenching of [DMPO-OH]{radical dot} radicals by Fe(II), but they did not suppress Fenton reaction by forming chelates with iron ions.
AB - Hydroxyl radical formation by Fenton reaction in the presence of an iron-chelating agent such as EDTA was traced by two different assay methods; an electron spin resonance (ESR) spin-trapping method with 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO), and high Performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-fluorescence detection with terephthalic acid (TPA), a fluorescent probe for hydroxyl radicals. From the ESR spin-trapping measurement, it was observed that EDTA seemed to suppress hydroxyl radical formation with the increase of its concentration. On the other hand, hydroxyl radical formation by Fenton reaction was not affected by EDTA monitored by HPLC assay. Similar inconsistent effects of other iron-chelating agents such as nitrylotriacetic acid (NTA), diethylenetriamine penta acetic acid (DTPA), oxalate and citrate were also observed. On the addition of EDTA solution to the reaction mixture 10 min after the Fenton reaction started, when hydroxyl radical formation should have almost ceased but the ESR signal of DMPO-OH radicals could be detected, it was observed that the DMPO-OH{radical dot} signal disappeared rapidly. With the simultaneous addition of Fe(II) solution and EDTA after the Fenton reaction ceased, the DMPO-OH{radical dot} signal disappeared more rapidly. The results indicated that these chelating agents should enhance the quenching of [DMPO-OH]{radical dot} radicals by Fe(II), but they did not suppress Fenton reaction by forming chelates with iron ions.
KW - 5,5-Dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide
KW - Electron spin resonance
KW - Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid
KW - Fenton reaction
KW - Hydroxyl radical
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548534343&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548534343&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.aca.2007.08.008
DO - 10.1016/j.aca.2007.08.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 17870296
AN - SCOPUS:34548534343
SN - 0003-2670
VL - 599
SP - 315
EP - 319
JO - Analytica Chimica Acta
JF - Analytica Chimica Acta
IS - 2
ER -