Is spine deformity surgery in patients with spastic cerebral palsy truly beneficial? A patient/parent evaluation

Koota Watanabe, Lawrence G. Lenke, Michael D. Daubs, Kei Watanabe, Keith H. Bridwell, Georgia Stobbs, Marsha Hensley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN. Retrospective clinical outcome study. OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the clinical outcomes and satisfaction associated with the surgical treatment of neuromuscular spinal deformity secondary to cerebral palsy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Controversy still exists regarding whether spinal deformity surgery is truly a beneficial surgery for patients with cerebral palsy (CP) since there is limited functional benefit and higher perioperative complications rates in this patient population. METHODS. Neuromuscular patient evaluation questionnaires were answered retrospectively by 84 patients/families of spastic CP patients undergoing spinal fusion. The average follow-up was 6.2 years (range: 2-16). The questionnaires were designed to assess expectation, cosmesis, function, patient care, quality of life, pulmonary function, pain, health status, self-image, and satisfaction. Questionnaire results, complications, and radiographic data were divided into "satisfied group" and "less satisfied group" and we analyzed reasons of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. RESULTS. The overall satisfaction rate was 92%. Ninety-three percent reported improvement with sitting balance, 94% with cosmesis, and 71% in patient's quality of life. Functional improvements seemed limited, but 8% to 40% of the patients still perceived the surgical results as improvement. The postoperative complication rate was 27%. The mean preoperative Cobb angle of the major curve was 88° (range: 53°-141°), which corrected to 39° (range: 5°-88°) after surgery. The less satisfied group had a significantly higher late complication rate, less correction of the major curve, greater residual major curve, and hyperlordosis of the lumbar spine after surgery. CONCLUSION. Despite the perioperative difficulties seen with CP patients, the majority of the patient/parents were satisfied with the results of the spinal deformity surgery. Functional improvements were limited but 8% to 40% of the patients still perceived the results as improved. The reason for less than optimal satisfaction appears to be due to less correction of the major curve, greater residual major Cobb angle, hyperlordosis of the lumbar spine after surgery, and late postoperative complications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2222-2232
Number of pages11
JournalSpine
Volume34
Issue number20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Sep

Fingerprint

Cerebral Palsy
Spine
Quality of Life
Spinal Fusion
Health Status
Patient Care
Parents
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pain
Lung

Keywords

  • Cerebral palsy
  • Outcome scores
  • Questionnaire

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Watanabe, K., Lenke, L. G., Daubs, M. D., Watanabe, K., Bridwell, K. H., Stobbs, G., & Hensley, M. (2009). Is spine deformity surgery in patients with spastic cerebral palsy truly beneficial? A patient/parent evaluation. Spine, 34(20), 2222-2232. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181948c8f

Is spine deformity surgery in patients with spastic cerebral palsy truly beneficial? A patient/parent evaluation. / Watanabe, Koota; Lenke, Lawrence G.; Daubs, Michael D.; Watanabe, Kei; Bridwell, Keith H.; Stobbs, Georgia; Hensley, Marsha.

In: Spine, Vol. 34, No. 20, 09.2009, p. 2222-2232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Watanabe, K, Lenke, LG, Daubs, MD, Watanabe, K, Bridwell, KH, Stobbs, G & Hensley, M 2009, 'Is spine deformity surgery in patients with spastic cerebral palsy truly beneficial? A patient/parent evaluation', Spine, vol. 34, no. 20, pp. 2222-2232. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181948c8f
Watanabe, Koota ; Lenke, Lawrence G. ; Daubs, Michael D. ; Watanabe, Kei ; Bridwell, Keith H. ; Stobbs, Georgia ; Hensley, Marsha. / Is spine deformity surgery in patients with spastic cerebral palsy truly beneficial? A patient/parent evaluation. In: Spine. 2009 ; Vol. 34, No. 20. pp. 2222-2232.
@article{358dbf4d27c54bff8a80117f2581cffd,
title = "Is spine deformity surgery in patients with spastic cerebral palsy truly beneficial?: A patient/parent evaluation",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN. Retrospective clinical outcome study. OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the clinical outcomes and satisfaction associated with the surgical treatment of neuromuscular spinal deformity secondary to cerebral palsy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Controversy still exists regarding whether spinal deformity surgery is truly a beneficial surgery for patients with cerebral palsy (CP) since there is limited functional benefit and higher perioperative complications rates in this patient population. METHODS. Neuromuscular patient evaluation questionnaires were answered retrospectively by 84 patients/families of spastic CP patients undergoing spinal fusion. The average follow-up was 6.2 years (range: 2-16). The questionnaires were designed to assess expectation, cosmesis, function, patient care, quality of life, pulmonary function, pain, health status, self-image, and satisfaction. Questionnaire results, complications, and radiographic data were divided into {"}satisfied group{"} and {"}less satisfied group{"} and we analyzed reasons of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. RESULTS. The overall satisfaction rate was 92{\%}. Ninety-three percent reported improvement with sitting balance, 94{\%} with cosmesis, and 71{\%} in patient's quality of life. Functional improvements seemed limited, but 8{\%} to 40{\%} of the patients still perceived the surgical results as improvement. The postoperative complication rate was 27{\%}. The mean preoperative Cobb angle of the major curve was 88° (range: 53°-141°), which corrected to 39° (range: 5°-88°) after surgery. The less satisfied group had a significantly higher late complication rate, less correction of the major curve, greater residual major curve, and hyperlordosis of the lumbar spine after surgery. CONCLUSION. Despite the perioperative difficulties seen with CP patients, the majority of the patient/parents were satisfied with the results of the spinal deformity surgery. Functional improvements were limited but 8{\%} to 40{\%} of the patients still perceived the results as improved. The reason for less than optimal satisfaction appears to be due to less correction of the major curve, greater residual major Cobb angle, hyperlordosis of the lumbar spine after surgery, and late postoperative complications.",
keywords = "Cerebral palsy, Outcome scores, Questionnaire",
author = "Koota Watanabe and Lenke, {Lawrence G.} and Daubs, {Michael D.} and Kei Watanabe and Bridwell, {Keith H.} and Georgia Stobbs and Marsha Hensley",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181948c8f",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "2222--2232",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is spine deformity surgery in patients with spastic cerebral palsy truly beneficial?

T2 - A patient/parent evaluation

AU - Watanabe, Koota

AU - Lenke, Lawrence G.

AU - Daubs, Michael D.

AU - Watanabe, Kei

AU - Bridwell, Keith H.

AU - Stobbs, Georgia

AU - Hensley, Marsha

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - STUDY DESIGN. Retrospective clinical outcome study. OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the clinical outcomes and satisfaction associated with the surgical treatment of neuromuscular spinal deformity secondary to cerebral palsy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Controversy still exists regarding whether spinal deformity surgery is truly a beneficial surgery for patients with cerebral palsy (CP) since there is limited functional benefit and higher perioperative complications rates in this patient population. METHODS. Neuromuscular patient evaluation questionnaires were answered retrospectively by 84 patients/families of spastic CP patients undergoing spinal fusion. The average follow-up was 6.2 years (range: 2-16). The questionnaires were designed to assess expectation, cosmesis, function, patient care, quality of life, pulmonary function, pain, health status, self-image, and satisfaction. Questionnaire results, complications, and radiographic data were divided into "satisfied group" and "less satisfied group" and we analyzed reasons of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. RESULTS. The overall satisfaction rate was 92%. Ninety-three percent reported improvement with sitting balance, 94% with cosmesis, and 71% in patient's quality of life. Functional improvements seemed limited, but 8% to 40% of the patients still perceived the surgical results as improvement. The postoperative complication rate was 27%. The mean preoperative Cobb angle of the major curve was 88° (range: 53°-141°), which corrected to 39° (range: 5°-88°) after surgery. The less satisfied group had a significantly higher late complication rate, less correction of the major curve, greater residual major curve, and hyperlordosis of the lumbar spine after surgery. CONCLUSION. Despite the perioperative difficulties seen with CP patients, the majority of the patient/parents were satisfied with the results of the spinal deformity surgery. Functional improvements were limited but 8% to 40% of the patients still perceived the results as improved. The reason for less than optimal satisfaction appears to be due to less correction of the major curve, greater residual major Cobb angle, hyperlordosis of the lumbar spine after surgery, and late postoperative complications.

AB - STUDY DESIGN. Retrospective clinical outcome study. OBJECTIVE. To evaluate the clinical outcomes and satisfaction associated with the surgical treatment of neuromuscular spinal deformity secondary to cerebral palsy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Controversy still exists regarding whether spinal deformity surgery is truly a beneficial surgery for patients with cerebral palsy (CP) since there is limited functional benefit and higher perioperative complications rates in this patient population. METHODS. Neuromuscular patient evaluation questionnaires were answered retrospectively by 84 patients/families of spastic CP patients undergoing spinal fusion. The average follow-up was 6.2 years (range: 2-16). The questionnaires were designed to assess expectation, cosmesis, function, patient care, quality of life, pulmonary function, pain, health status, self-image, and satisfaction. Questionnaire results, complications, and radiographic data were divided into "satisfied group" and "less satisfied group" and we analyzed reasons of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. RESULTS. The overall satisfaction rate was 92%. Ninety-three percent reported improvement with sitting balance, 94% with cosmesis, and 71% in patient's quality of life. Functional improvements seemed limited, but 8% to 40% of the patients still perceived the surgical results as improvement. The postoperative complication rate was 27%. The mean preoperative Cobb angle of the major curve was 88° (range: 53°-141°), which corrected to 39° (range: 5°-88°) after surgery. The less satisfied group had a significantly higher late complication rate, less correction of the major curve, greater residual major curve, and hyperlordosis of the lumbar spine after surgery. CONCLUSION. Despite the perioperative difficulties seen with CP patients, the majority of the patient/parents were satisfied with the results of the spinal deformity surgery. Functional improvements were limited but 8% to 40% of the patients still perceived the results as improved. The reason for less than optimal satisfaction appears to be due to less correction of the major curve, greater residual major Cobb angle, hyperlordosis of the lumbar spine after surgery, and late postoperative complications.

KW - Cerebral palsy

KW - Outcome scores

KW - Questionnaire

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349736384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349736384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181948c8f

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181948c8f

M3 - Article

C2 - 19752709

AN - SCOPUS:70349736384

VL - 34

SP - 2222

EP - 2232

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 20

ER -