Is video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy better than minimally invasive open thoracotomy?

Masahiro Kaji, H. Sakurai, Kyohei Masai, K. Suemasu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews our experiences of the current video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and minimally invasive open thoracotomy for resection of lung cancer. Between August 1999 and April 2007 at Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, we performed VATS lobectomy in 243 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer. It is certain that VATS lobectomy is acceptable in view of its low invasiveness, mortality, morbidity. And from an oncological viewpoint, VATS lobectomy is not inferior to conventional lobectomy. Therefore, we consider VATS lobectomy to be one of the therapeutic options in patients with clinical stage I lung cancer. However, what is most important is to achieve an anatomic lobectomy and complete mediastinal lymph node dissection. It may be that it is not important for differences of approach methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)302-307
Number of pages6
JournalKyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery
Volume62
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Apr
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery
Thoracotomy
Lung Neoplasms
Tokyo
Lymph Node Excision
Japan
Morbidity
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Is video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy better than minimally invasive open thoracotomy? / Kaji, Masahiro; Sakurai, H.; Masai, Kyohei; Suemasu, K.

In: Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery, Vol. 62, No. 4, 04.2009, p. 302-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{46136fd06dc1458a96d4801e79224033,
title = "Is video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy better than minimally invasive open thoracotomy?",
abstract = "This article reviews our experiences of the current video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and minimally invasive open thoracotomy for resection of lung cancer. Between August 1999 and April 2007 at Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, we performed VATS lobectomy in 243 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer. It is certain that VATS lobectomy is acceptable in view of its low invasiveness, mortality, morbidity. And from an oncological viewpoint, VATS lobectomy is not inferior to conventional lobectomy. Therefore, we consider VATS lobectomy to be one of the therapeutic options in patients with clinical stage I lung cancer. However, what is most important is to achieve an anatomic lobectomy and complete mediastinal lymph node dissection. It may be that it is not important for differences of approach methods.",
author = "Masahiro Kaji and H. Sakurai and Kyohei Masai and K. Suemasu",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "302--307",
journal = "Japanese Journal of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0021-5252",
publisher = "Nankodo Co., Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy better than minimally invasive open thoracotomy?

AU - Kaji, Masahiro

AU - Sakurai, H.

AU - Masai, Kyohei

AU - Suemasu, K.

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - This article reviews our experiences of the current video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and minimally invasive open thoracotomy for resection of lung cancer. Between August 1999 and April 2007 at Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, we performed VATS lobectomy in 243 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer. It is certain that VATS lobectomy is acceptable in view of its low invasiveness, mortality, morbidity. And from an oncological viewpoint, VATS lobectomy is not inferior to conventional lobectomy. Therefore, we consider VATS lobectomy to be one of the therapeutic options in patients with clinical stage I lung cancer. However, what is most important is to achieve an anatomic lobectomy and complete mediastinal lymph node dissection. It may be that it is not important for differences of approach methods.

AB - This article reviews our experiences of the current video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and minimally invasive open thoracotomy for resection of lung cancer. Between August 1999 and April 2007 at Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, we performed VATS lobectomy in 243 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer. It is certain that VATS lobectomy is acceptable in view of its low invasiveness, mortality, morbidity. And from an oncological viewpoint, VATS lobectomy is not inferior to conventional lobectomy. Therefore, we consider VATS lobectomy to be one of the therapeutic options in patients with clinical stage I lung cancer. However, what is most important is to achieve an anatomic lobectomy and complete mediastinal lymph node dissection. It may be that it is not important for differences of approach methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65649088328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65649088328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 302

EP - 307

JO - Japanese Journal of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Japanese Journal of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0021-5252

IS - 4

ER -