Is workaholism good or bad for employee well-being? The distinctiveness of workaholism and work engagement among Japanese employees

Akihito Shimazu, Wilmar B. Schaufeli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

111 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to demonstrate the empirical distinctiveness of workaholism and work engagement by examining their relationships with well-being in a sample of 776 Japanese employees. We expected that workaholism is associated with unwell-being (i.e., high psychological distress and physical complaints, low job and family satisfaction, and low job performance), whereas work engagement is associated with well-being. Well-validated questionnaires were used to measure workaholism (DUWAS), work engagement (UWES), and well-being (BJSQ, HPQ). Structural Equation Modeling showed that, as expected, workaholism was positively associated with ill-health (i.e., psychological distress and physical complaints) and negatively associated with life satisfaction (i.e., job and family satisfaction) and job performance. In contrast, work engagement was negatively associated with ill-health and positively associated with life satisfaction and job performance. These findings suggest that workaholism and work engagement are two different kinds of concepts, which are negatively and positively related to various indicators of well-being, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)495-502
Number of pages8
JournalIndustrial Health
Volume47
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Sep 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Job Satisfaction
Psychology
Health
Work Performance
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Family satisfaction
  • Job performance
  • Job satisfaction
  • Physical complaints
  • Psychological distress
  • Structural equation modeling
  • Work engagement
  • Workaholism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Is workaholism good or bad for employee well-being? The distinctiveness of workaholism and work engagement among Japanese employees. / Shimazu, Akihito; Schaufeli, Wilmar B.

In: Industrial Health, Vol. 47, No. 5, 01.09.2009, p. 495-502.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a774a5090163408fb3d6c8ff3d2bf267,
title = "Is workaholism good or bad for employee well-being? The distinctiveness of workaholism and work engagement among Japanese employees",
abstract = "The aim of the present study is to demonstrate the empirical distinctiveness of workaholism and work engagement by examining their relationships with well-being in a sample of 776 Japanese employees. We expected that workaholism is associated with unwell-being (i.e., high psychological distress and physical complaints, low job and family satisfaction, and low job performance), whereas work engagement is associated with well-being. Well-validated questionnaires were used to measure workaholism (DUWAS), work engagement (UWES), and well-being (BJSQ, HPQ). Structural Equation Modeling showed that, as expected, workaholism was positively associated with ill-health (i.e., psychological distress and physical complaints) and negatively associated with life satisfaction (i.e., job and family satisfaction) and job performance. In contrast, work engagement was negatively associated with ill-health and positively associated with life satisfaction and job performance. These findings suggest that workaholism and work engagement are two different kinds of concepts, which are negatively and positively related to various indicators of well-being, respectively.",
keywords = "Family satisfaction, Job performance, Job satisfaction, Physical complaints, Psychological distress, Structural equation modeling, Work engagement, Workaholism",
author = "Akihito Shimazu and Schaufeli, {Wilmar B.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2486/indhealth.47.495",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "495--502",
journal = "Industrial Health",
issn = "0019-8366",
publisher = "National Institute of Industrial Health",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is workaholism good or bad for employee well-being? The distinctiveness of workaholism and work engagement among Japanese employees

AU - Shimazu, Akihito

AU - Schaufeli, Wilmar B.

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - The aim of the present study is to demonstrate the empirical distinctiveness of workaholism and work engagement by examining their relationships with well-being in a sample of 776 Japanese employees. We expected that workaholism is associated with unwell-being (i.e., high psychological distress and physical complaints, low job and family satisfaction, and low job performance), whereas work engagement is associated with well-being. Well-validated questionnaires were used to measure workaholism (DUWAS), work engagement (UWES), and well-being (BJSQ, HPQ). Structural Equation Modeling showed that, as expected, workaholism was positively associated with ill-health (i.e., psychological distress and physical complaints) and negatively associated with life satisfaction (i.e., job and family satisfaction) and job performance. In contrast, work engagement was negatively associated with ill-health and positively associated with life satisfaction and job performance. These findings suggest that workaholism and work engagement are two different kinds of concepts, which are negatively and positively related to various indicators of well-being, respectively.

AB - The aim of the present study is to demonstrate the empirical distinctiveness of workaholism and work engagement by examining their relationships with well-being in a sample of 776 Japanese employees. We expected that workaholism is associated with unwell-being (i.e., high psychological distress and physical complaints, low job and family satisfaction, and low job performance), whereas work engagement is associated with well-being. Well-validated questionnaires were used to measure workaholism (DUWAS), work engagement (UWES), and well-being (BJSQ, HPQ). Structural Equation Modeling showed that, as expected, workaholism was positively associated with ill-health (i.e., psychological distress and physical complaints) and negatively associated with life satisfaction (i.e., job and family satisfaction) and job performance. In contrast, work engagement was negatively associated with ill-health and positively associated with life satisfaction and job performance. These findings suggest that workaholism and work engagement are two different kinds of concepts, which are negatively and positively related to various indicators of well-being, respectively.

KW - Family satisfaction

KW - Job performance

KW - Job satisfaction

KW - Physical complaints

KW - Psychological distress

KW - Structural equation modeling

KW - Work engagement

KW - Workaholism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350313403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350313403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2486/indhealth.47.495

DO - 10.2486/indhealth.47.495

M3 - Article

C2 - 19834258

AN - SCOPUS:70350313403

VL - 47

SP - 495

EP - 502

JO - Industrial Health

JF - Industrial Health

SN - 0019-8366

IS - 5

ER -