It's Not My Fault: Postdictive Modulation of Intentional Binding by Monetary Gains and Losses

Keisuke Takahata, Hidehiko Takahashi, Takaki Maeda, Satoshi Umeda, Tetsuya Suhara, Masaru Mimura, Motoichiro Kato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sense of agency refers to the feeling that one's voluntary actions caused external events. Past studies have shown that compression of the subjective temporal interval between actions and external events, called intentional binding, is closely linked to the experience of agency. Current theories postulate that the experience of agency is constructed via predictive and postdictive pathways. One remaining problem is the source of human causality bias; people often make misjudgments on the causality of voluntary actions and external events depending on their rewarding or punishing outcomes. Although human causality bias implies that sense of agency can be modified by post-action information, convincing empirical findings for this issue are lacking. Here, we hypothesized that sense of agency would be modified by affective valences of action outcomes. To examine this issue, we investigated how rewarding and punishing outcomes following voluntary action modulate behavioral measures of agency using intentional binding paradigm and classical conditioning procedures. In the acquisition phase, auditory stimuli were paired with positive, neutral or negative monetary outcomes. Tone-reward associations were evaluated using reaction times and preference ratings. In the experimental session, participants performed a variant of intentional binding task, where participants made timing judgments for onsets of actions and sensory outcomes while playing simple slot games. Our results showed that temporal binding was modified by affective valences of action outcomes. Specifically, intentional binding was attenuated when negative outcome occurred, consistent with self-serving bias. Our study not only provides evidence for postdictive modification of agency, but also proposes a possible mechanism of human causality bias.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere53421
JournalPLoS One
Volume7
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Dec 28

Fingerprint

Causality
Modulation
Classical Conditioning
Reward
Reaction Time
Emotions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

It's Not My Fault : Postdictive Modulation of Intentional Binding by Monetary Gains and Losses. / Takahata, Keisuke; Takahashi, Hidehiko; Maeda, Takaki; Umeda, Satoshi; Suhara, Tetsuya; Mimura, Masaru; Kato, Motoichiro.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 7, No. 12, e53421, 28.12.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Takahata, Keisuke ; Takahashi, Hidehiko ; Maeda, Takaki ; Umeda, Satoshi ; Suhara, Tetsuya ; Mimura, Masaru ; Kato, Motoichiro. / It's Not My Fault : Postdictive Modulation of Intentional Binding by Monetary Gains and Losses. In: PLoS One. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 12.
@article{af5d261d30d7432d83e5853ef53d3f57,
title = "It's Not My Fault: Postdictive Modulation of Intentional Binding by Monetary Gains and Losses",
abstract = "Sense of agency refers to the feeling that one's voluntary actions caused external events. Past studies have shown that compression of the subjective temporal interval between actions and external events, called intentional binding, is closely linked to the experience of agency. Current theories postulate that the experience of agency is constructed via predictive and postdictive pathways. One remaining problem is the source of human causality bias; people often make misjudgments on the causality of voluntary actions and external events depending on their rewarding or punishing outcomes. Although human causality bias implies that sense of agency can be modified by post-action information, convincing empirical findings for this issue are lacking. Here, we hypothesized that sense of agency would be modified by affective valences of action outcomes. To examine this issue, we investigated how rewarding and punishing outcomes following voluntary action modulate behavioral measures of agency using intentional binding paradigm and classical conditioning procedures. In the acquisition phase, auditory stimuli were paired with positive, neutral or negative monetary outcomes. Tone-reward associations were evaluated using reaction times and preference ratings. In the experimental session, participants performed a variant of intentional binding task, where participants made timing judgments for onsets of actions and sensory outcomes while playing simple slot games. Our results showed that temporal binding was modified by affective valences of action outcomes. Specifically, intentional binding was attenuated when negative outcome occurred, consistent with self-serving bias. Our study not only provides evidence for postdictive modification of agency, but also proposes a possible mechanism of human causality bias.",
author = "Keisuke Takahata and Hidehiko Takahashi and Takaki Maeda and Satoshi Umeda and Tetsuya Suhara and Masaru Mimura and Motoichiro Kato",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0053421",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - It's Not My Fault

T2 - Postdictive Modulation of Intentional Binding by Monetary Gains and Losses

AU - Takahata, Keisuke

AU - Takahashi, Hidehiko

AU - Maeda, Takaki

AU - Umeda, Satoshi

AU - Suhara, Tetsuya

AU - Mimura, Masaru

AU - Kato, Motoichiro

PY - 2012/12/28

Y1 - 2012/12/28

N2 - Sense of agency refers to the feeling that one's voluntary actions caused external events. Past studies have shown that compression of the subjective temporal interval between actions and external events, called intentional binding, is closely linked to the experience of agency. Current theories postulate that the experience of agency is constructed via predictive and postdictive pathways. One remaining problem is the source of human causality bias; people often make misjudgments on the causality of voluntary actions and external events depending on their rewarding or punishing outcomes. Although human causality bias implies that sense of agency can be modified by post-action information, convincing empirical findings for this issue are lacking. Here, we hypothesized that sense of agency would be modified by affective valences of action outcomes. To examine this issue, we investigated how rewarding and punishing outcomes following voluntary action modulate behavioral measures of agency using intentional binding paradigm and classical conditioning procedures. In the acquisition phase, auditory stimuli were paired with positive, neutral or negative monetary outcomes. Tone-reward associations were evaluated using reaction times and preference ratings. In the experimental session, participants performed a variant of intentional binding task, where participants made timing judgments for onsets of actions and sensory outcomes while playing simple slot games. Our results showed that temporal binding was modified by affective valences of action outcomes. Specifically, intentional binding was attenuated when negative outcome occurred, consistent with self-serving bias. Our study not only provides evidence for postdictive modification of agency, but also proposes a possible mechanism of human causality bias.

AB - Sense of agency refers to the feeling that one's voluntary actions caused external events. Past studies have shown that compression of the subjective temporal interval between actions and external events, called intentional binding, is closely linked to the experience of agency. Current theories postulate that the experience of agency is constructed via predictive and postdictive pathways. One remaining problem is the source of human causality bias; people often make misjudgments on the causality of voluntary actions and external events depending on their rewarding or punishing outcomes. Although human causality bias implies that sense of agency can be modified by post-action information, convincing empirical findings for this issue are lacking. Here, we hypothesized that sense of agency would be modified by affective valences of action outcomes. To examine this issue, we investigated how rewarding and punishing outcomes following voluntary action modulate behavioral measures of agency using intentional binding paradigm and classical conditioning procedures. In the acquisition phase, auditory stimuli were paired with positive, neutral or negative monetary outcomes. Tone-reward associations were evaluated using reaction times and preference ratings. In the experimental session, participants performed a variant of intentional binding task, where participants made timing judgments for onsets of actions and sensory outcomes while playing simple slot games. Our results showed that temporal binding was modified by affective valences of action outcomes. Specifically, intentional binding was attenuated when negative outcome occurred, consistent with self-serving bias. Our study not only provides evidence for postdictive modification of agency, but also proposes a possible mechanism of human causality bias.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871700799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871700799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0053421

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0053421

M3 - Article

C2 - 23285293

AN - SCOPUS:84871700799

VL - 7

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 12

M1 - e53421

ER -