Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire

Part 3. Determination of reliability

Mitsuru Fukui, Kazuhiro Chiba, Mamoru Kawakami, Shinichi Kikuchi, Shinichi Konno, Masabumi Miyamoto, Atsushi Seichi, Tadashi Shimamura, Osamu Shirado, Toshihiko Taguchi, Kazuhisa Takahashi, Katsushi Takeshita, Toshikazu Tani, Yoshiaki Toyama, Kazuo Yonenobu, Eiji Wada, Takashi Tanaka, Yoshio Hirota

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. The manner of measuring the outcome of cervical myelopathy must be patient-oriented and have sufficient reliability and validity. The current Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system for cervical myelopathy is widely used but has not met this requirement. The first- and second-round surveys established 24 items for inclusion on a new questionnaire for cervical myelopathy. The purpose of this study (the third-round survey A) was to confirm the reproducibility of patient responses to the selected questions. Methods. A total of 201 patients with cervical myelopathy and with no change of symptoms between the two interviews were included. Each patient was interviewed twice using the same questionnaire at an interval of 4 weeks. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated by determining the extension of the weighted kappa coefficients. Results. The weighted kappa coefficient for each item was >0.4, confirming that the test-retest reliability was acceptable. Conclusions. The newly developed JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire was proven to have sufficient reliability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-326
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Science
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Jul
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Diseases
Reproducibility of Results
Orthopedics
Surveys and Questionnaires
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire : Part 3. Determination of reliability. / Fukui, Mitsuru; Chiba, Kazuhiro; Kawakami, Mamoru; Kikuchi, Shinichi; Konno, Shinichi; Miyamoto, Masabumi; Seichi, Atsushi; Shimamura, Tadashi; Shirado, Osamu; Taguchi, Toshihiko; Takahashi, Kazuhisa; Takeshita, Katsushi; Tani, Toshikazu; Toyama, Yoshiaki; Yonenobu, Kazuo; Wada, Eiji; Tanaka, Takashi; Hirota, Yoshio.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Science, Vol. 12, No. 4, 07.2007, p. 321-326.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fukui, M, Chiba, K, Kawakami, M, Kikuchi, S, Konno, S, Miyamoto, M, Seichi, A, Shimamura, T, Shirado, O, Taguchi, T, Takahashi, K, Takeshita, K, Tani, T, Toyama, Y, Yonenobu, K, Wada, E, Tanaka, T & Hirota, Y 2007, 'Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire: Part 3. Determination of reliability', Journal of Orthopaedic Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1131-4
Fukui, Mitsuru ; Chiba, Kazuhiro ; Kawakami, Mamoru ; Kikuchi, Shinichi ; Konno, Shinichi ; Miyamoto, Masabumi ; Seichi, Atsushi ; Shimamura, Tadashi ; Shirado, Osamu ; Taguchi, Toshihiko ; Takahashi, Kazuhisa ; Takeshita, Katsushi ; Tani, Toshikazu ; Toyama, Yoshiaki ; Yonenobu, Kazuo ; Wada, Eiji ; Tanaka, Takashi ; Hirota, Yoshio. / Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire : Part 3. Determination of reliability. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2007 ; Vol. 12, No. 4. pp. 321-326.
@article{e63529afb15341c8a59714dc0457c1d6,
title = "Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire: Part 3. Determination of reliability",
abstract = "Background. The manner of measuring the outcome of cervical myelopathy must be patient-oriented and have sufficient reliability and validity. The current Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system for cervical myelopathy is widely used but has not met this requirement. The first- and second-round surveys established 24 items for inclusion on a new questionnaire for cervical myelopathy. The purpose of this study (the third-round survey A) was to confirm the reproducibility of patient responses to the selected questions. Methods. A total of 201 patients with cervical myelopathy and with no change of symptoms between the two interviews were included. Each patient was interviewed twice using the same questionnaire at an interval of 4 weeks. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated by determining the extension of the weighted kappa coefficients. Results. The weighted kappa coefficient for each item was >0.4, confirming that the test-retest reliability was acceptable. Conclusions. The newly developed JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire was proven to have sufficient reliability.",
author = "Mitsuru Fukui and Kazuhiro Chiba and Mamoru Kawakami and Shinichi Kikuchi and Shinichi Konno and Masabumi Miyamoto and Atsushi Seichi and Tadashi Shimamura and Osamu Shirado and Toshihiko Taguchi and Kazuhisa Takahashi and Katsushi Takeshita and Toshikazu Tani and Yoshiaki Toyama and Kazuo Yonenobu and Eiji Wada and Takashi Tanaka and Yoshio Hirota",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s00776-007-1131-4",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "321--326",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Science",
issn = "0949-2658",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire

T2 - Part 3. Determination of reliability

AU - Fukui, Mitsuru

AU - Chiba, Kazuhiro

AU - Kawakami, Mamoru

AU - Kikuchi, Shinichi

AU - Konno, Shinichi

AU - Miyamoto, Masabumi

AU - Seichi, Atsushi

AU - Shimamura, Tadashi

AU - Shirado, Osamu

AU - Taguchi, Toshihiko

AU - Takahashi, Kazuhisa

AU - Takeshita, Katsushi

AU - Tani, Toshikazu

AU - Toyama, Yoshiaki

AU - Yonenobu, Kazuo

AU - Wada, Eiji

AU - Tanaka, Takashi

AU - Hirota, Yoshio

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Background. The manner of measuring the outcome of cervical myelopathy must be patient-oriented and have sufficient reliability and validity. The current Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system for cervical myelopathy is widely used but has not met this requirement. The first- and second-round surveys established 24 items for inclusion on a new questionnaire for cervical myelopathy. The purpose of this study (the third-round survey A) was to confirm the reproducibility of patient responses to the selected questions. Methods. A total of 201 patients with cervical myelopathy and with no change of symptoms between the two interviews were included. Each patient was interviewed twice using the same questionnaire at an interval of 4 weeks. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated by determining the extension of the weighted kappa coefficients. Results. The weighted kappa coefficient for each item was >0.4, confirming that the test-retest reliability was acceptable. Conclusions. The newly developed JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire was proven to have sufficient reliability.

AB - Background. The manner of measuring the outcome of cervical myelopathy must be patient-oriented and have sufficient reliability and validity. The current Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system for cervical myelopathy is widely used but has not met this requirement. The first- and second-round surveys established 24 items for inclusion on a new questionnaire for cervical myelopathy. The purpose of this study (the third-round survey A) was to confirm the reproducibility of patient responses to the selected questions. Methods. A total of 201 patients with cervical myelopathy and with no change of symptoms between the two interviews were included. Each patient was interviewed twice using the same questionnaire at an interval of 4 weeks. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated by determining the extension of the weighted kappa coefficients. Results. The weighted kappa coefficient for each item was >0.4, confirming that the test-retest reliability was acceptable. Conclusions. The newly developed JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire was proven to have sufficient reliability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547432046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547432046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00776-007-1131-4

DO - 10.1007/s00776-007-1131-4

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 321

EP - 326

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Science

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Science

SN - 0949-2658

IS - 4

ER -