Japan's conciliation with the United States in climate change negotiations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper attempts to analyze Japan's conciliation with the United States regarding national targets on greenhouse gas emissions in the multilateral climate change negotiations (1990-2001) for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and for the Kyoto Protocol to the Convention. Japan's conciliatory proposals had nothing to do with bilateral pressure from the United States. Why, then, did Japan make special efforts to conciliate with the United States, and offer lenient proposals? I focus on three factors: concern for international status, the costs of the climate change regime and domestic politics. My main argument is that the Japanese Ministry of International Trade and Industry used 'conciliation' with the United States in its favor as an excuse for making proposals that would emasculate the climate change regime and as a means of receiving support from the United States for differentiation of national targets on greenhouse gas emissions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-96
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Relations of the Asia-Pacific
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Feb 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

climate change
Japan
regime
Kyoto Protocol
world trade
ministry
UNO
politics
Climate change
industry
costs
Greenhouse gas emissions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Japan's conciliation with the United States in climate change negotiations. / Miyaoka, Isao.

In: International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 4, No. 1, 01.02.2004, p. 73-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8c2c406937c540a7921c64cd084fcc94,
title = "Japan's conciliation with the United States in climate change negotiations",
abstract = "This paper attempts to analyze Japan's conciliation with the United States regarding national targets on greenhouse gas emissions in the multilateral climate change negotiations (1990-2001) for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and for the Kyoto Protocol to the Convention. Japan's conciliatory proposals had nothing to do with bilateral pressure from the United States. Why, then, did Japan make special efforts to conciliate with the United States, and offer lenient proposals? I focus on three factors: concern for international status, the costs of the climate change regime and domestic politics. My main argument is that the Japanese Ministry of International Trade and Industry used 'conciliation' with the United States in its favor as an excuse for making proposals that would emasculate the climate change regime and as a means of receiving support from the United States for differentiation of national targets on greenhouse gas emissions.",
author = "Isao Miyaoka",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/irap/4.1.73",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "73--96",
journal = "International Relations of the Asia-Pacific",
issn = "1470-482X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Japan's conciliation with the United States in climate change negotiations

AU - Miyaoka, Isao

PY - 2004/2/1

Y1 - 2004/2/1

N2 - This paper attempts to analyze Japan's conciliation with the United States regarding national targets on greenhouse gas emissions in the multilateral climate change negotiations (1990-2001) for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and for the Kyoto Protocol to the Convention. Japan's conciliatory proposals had nothing to do with bilateral pressure from the United States. Why, then, did Japan make special efforts to conciliate with the United States, and offer lenient proposals? I focus on three factors: concern for international status, the costs of the climate change regime and domestic politics. My main argument is that the Japanese Ministry of International Trade and Industry used 'conciliation' with the United States in its favor as an excuse for making proposals that would emasculate the climate change regime and as a means of receiving support from the United States for differentiation of national targets on greenhouse gas emissions.

AB - This paper attempts to analyze Japan's conciliation with the United States regarding national targets on greenhouse gas emissions in the multilateral climate change negotiations (1990-2001) for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and for the Kyoto Protocol to the Convention. Japan's conciliatory proposals had nothing to do with bilateral pressure from the United States. Why, then, did Japan make special efforts to conciliate with the United States, and offer lenient proposals? I focus on three factors: concern for international status, the costs of the climate change regime and domestic politics. My main argument is that the Japanese Ministry of International Trade and Industry used 'conciliation' with the United States in its favor as an excuse for making proposals that would emasculate the climate change regime and as a means of receiving support from the United States for differentiation of national targets on greenhouse gas emissions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045156445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045156445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/irap/4.1.73

DO - 10.1093/irap/4.1.73

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 73

EP - 96

JO - International Relations of the Asia-Pacific

JF - International Relations of the Asia-Pacific

SN - 1470-482X

IS - 1

ER -