Japan’s long-term care regulations focused on structure – rationale and future prospects

Naoki Ikegami, Tomoaki Ishibashi, Takashi Amano

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Regulations are ostensibly implemented to improve quality and contain public expenditures, and also to show the public that the government is responding to abuses reported by the media. When regulations are revised, professional organizations tend to lobby for upgrading qualification and staffing level requirements because it would advance their status. On the other hand, provider organizations tend to lobby against any revisions that would increase their costs. Their opposing positions could theoretically lead to an ideal balance, skilfully mediated by the government organization responsible for drafting and implementing the regulations. However, in the Japanese context, it has led to a sub-optimal compromise that does not necessarily reflect the needs of society. The government organization also has a major stake because its power and budget would be expanded by supporting and leveraging the power of the interest groups (Lowi, 1979). As a practical issue, a phase-in period is needed for the government agency to develop the capacity to enforce new regulations and for the organizations affected by them to be able to comply with the new requirements. Therefore, the regulations on the provision of long-term care services can only be understood from the underlying motives of the parties immediately concerned. This chapter will begin by presenting the historical background in which long-term care developed in Japan. Next the existing regulations governing long-term care providers will be described, followed by the reasons why they have been focused on the structural aspects of staffing levels, qualifications and facility standards rather than on measurable resident outcomes. The final section looks at the future prospects for monitoring quality in long-term care.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRegulating Long-Term Care Quality: An International Comparison
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages121-144
Number of pages24
ISBN (Print)9781107323711, 9781107042063
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Long-term care
Rationale
Japan
Government
Lobbies
Staffing
Qualification
Interest groups
Upgrading
Professional organizations
Residents
Monitoring
Abuse
Compromise
Costs
Public expenditure
Drafting
Government agencies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Ikegami, N., Ishibashi, T., & Amano, T. (2012). Japan’s long-term care regulations focused on structure – rationale and future prospects. In Regulating Long-Term Care Quality: An International Comparison (pp. 121-144). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323711.008

Japan’s long-term care regulations focused on structure – rationale and future prospects. / Ikegami, Naoki; Ishibashi, Tomoaki; Amano, Takashi.

Regulating Long-Term Care Quality: An International Comparison. Cambridge University Press, 2012. p. 121-144.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Ikegami, N, Ishibashi, T & Amano, T 2012, Japan’s long-term care regulations focused on structure – rationale and future prospects. in Regulating Long-Term Care Quality: An International Comparison. Cambridge University Press, pp. 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323711.008
Ikegami N, Ishibashi T, Amano T. Japan’s long-term care regulations focused on structure – rationale and future prospects. In Regulating Long-Term Care Quality: An International Comparison. Cambridge University Press. 2012. p. 121-144 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323711.008
Ikegami, Naoki ; Ishibashi, Tomoaki ; Amano, Takashi. / Japan’s long-term care regulations focused on structure – rationale and future prospects. Regulating Long-Term Care Quality: An International Comparison. Cambridge University Press, 2012. pp. 121-144
@inbook{bc05340d563d467a8374ab0bbe42c4bd,
title = "Japan’s long-term care regulations focused on structure – rationale and future prospects",
abstract = "Regulations are ostensibly implemented to improve quality and contain public expenditures, and also to show the public that the government is responding to abuses reported by the media. When regulations are revised, professional organizations tend to lobby for upgrading qualification and staffing level requirements because it would advance their status. On the other hand, provider organizations tend to lobby against any revisions that would increase their costs. Their opposing positions could theoretically lead to an ideal balance, skilfully mediated by the government organization responsible for drafting and implementing the regulations. However, in the Japanese context, it has led to a sub-optimal compromise that does not necessarily reflect the needs of society. The government organization also has a major stake because its power and budget would be expanded by supporting and leveraging the power of the interest groups (Lowi, 1979). As a practical issue, a phase-in period is needed for the government agency to develop the capacity to enforce new regulations and for the organizations affected by them to be able to comply with the new requirements. Therefore, the regulations on the provision of long-term care services can only be understood from the underlying motives of the parties immediately concerned. This chapter will begin by presenting the historical background in which long-term care developed in Japan. Next the existing regulations governing long-term care providers will be described, followed by the reasons why they have been focused on the structural aspects of staffing levels, qualifications and facility standards rather than on measurable resident outcomes. The final section looks at the future prospects for monitoring quality in long-term care.",
author = "Naoki Ikegami and Tomoaki Ishibashi and Takashi Amano",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781107323711.008",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781107323711",
pages = "121--144",
booktitle = "Regulating Long-Term Care Quality: An International Comparison",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Japan’s long-term care regulations focused on structure – rationale and future prospects

AU - Ikegami, Naoki

AU - Ishibashi, Tomoaki

AU - Amano, Takashi

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Regulations are ostensibly implemented to improve quality and contain public expenditures, and also to show the public that the government is responding to abuses reported by the media. When regulations are revised, professional organizations tend to lobby for upgrading qualification and staffing level requirements because it would advance their status. On the other hand, provider organizations tend to lobby against any revisions that would increase their costs. Their opposing positions could theoretically lead to an ideal balance, skilfully mediated by the government organization responsible for drafting and implementing the regulations. However, in the Japanese context, it has led to a sub-optimal compromise that does not necessarily reflect the needs of society. The government organization also has a major stake because its power and budget would be expanded by supporting and leveraging the power of the interest groups (Lowi, 1979). As a practical issue, a phase-in period is needed for the government agency to develop the capacity to enforce new regulations and for the organizations affected by them to be able to comply with the new requirements. Therefore, the regulations on the provision of long-term care services can only be understood from the underlying motives of the parties immediately concerned. This chapter will begin by presenting the historical background in which long-term care developed in Japan. Next the existing regulations governing long-term care providers will be described, followed by the reasons why they have been focused on the structural aspects of staffing levels, qualifications and facility standards rather than on measurable resident outcomes. The final section looks at the future prospects for monitoring quality in long-term care.

AB - Regulations are ostensibly implemented to improve quality and contain public expenditures, and also to show the public that the government is responding to abuses reported by the media. When regulations are revised, professional organizations tend to lobby for upgrading qualification and staffing level requirements because it would advance their status. On the other hand, provider organizations tend to lobby against any revisions that would increase their costs. Their opposing positions could theoretically lead to an ideal balance, skilfully mediated by the government organization responsible for drafting and implementing the regulations. However, in the Japanese context, it has led to a sub-optimal compromise that does not necessarily reflect the needs of society. The government organization also has a major stake because its power and budget would be expanded by supporting and leveraging the power of the interest groups (Lowi, 1979). As a practical issue, a phase-in period is needed for the government agency to develop the capacity to enforce new regulations and for the organizations affected by them to be able to comply with the new requirements. Therefore, the regulations on the provision of long-term care services can only be understood from the underlying motives of the parties immediately concerned. This chapter will begin by presenting the historical background in which long-term care developed in Japan. Next the existing regulations governing long-term care providers will be described, followed by the reasons why they have been focused on the structural aspects of staffing levels, qualifications and facility standards rather than on measurable resident outcomes. The final section looks at the future prospects for monitoring quality in long-term care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924674640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924674640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781107323711.008

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781107323711.008

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84924674640

SN - 9781107323711

SN - 9781107042063

SP - 121

EP - 144

BT - Regulating Long-Term Care Quality: An International Comparison

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -