Jus Sanguinis in Japan the Origin of Citizenship in a Comparative Perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the origin of jus sanguinis (citizenship attribution by parentage) in Japan as an illustration of the emergence of membership criteria in the modern state. Three European cases-Britain, France and Germany-provide a comparative perspective. Previous literature has tended to associate jus sangiunis with ethnic nationalism or an ethnocultural understanding of the nation. In fact, the principle of citizenship that emphasizes descent rather than birthplace appears to fit well with the image of the ethnically exclusive nature of contemporary Japanese society. However, I will argue that in Japan, as in the three European countries, the initial adoption of particular membership criteria had little to do with conceptions of nationhood or nationalism. An analysis of the factors leading to the legislation of the 1899 nationality law reveals that Japan had potentials for developing citizenship criteria with an emphasis on birthplace (jus soli) and residence (jus domicili) just as those in Britain and France. Yet a relatively strict system of jus sanguims, as in Germany, was instituted. The paper identifies other determinants of the principle of citizenship, including legal practices prior to the emergence of the modern state, the state's efforts to organize the populations subject to its rule, and domestic and international security concerns.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Comparative Sociology
Volume39
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

citizenship
Japan
nationalism
France
domestic security
legal usage
international security
nationality
attribution
legislation
determinants
Law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{153f5d9907744abea49f02f6cf511f41,
title = "Jus Sanguinis in Japan the Origin of Citizenship in a Comparative Perspective",
abstract = "This paper examines the origin of jus sanguinis (citizenship attribution by parentage) in Japan as an illustration of the emergence of membership criteria in the modern state. Three European cases-Britain, France and Germany-provide a comparative perspective. Previous literature has tended to associate jus sangiunis with ethnic nationalism or an ethnocultural understanding of the nation. In fact, the principle of citizenship that emphasizes descent rather than birthplace appears to fit well with the image of the ethnically exclusive nature of contemporary Japanese society. However, I will argue that in Japan, as in the three European countries, the initial adoption of particular membership criteria had little to do with conceptions of nationhood or nationalism. An analysis of the factors leading to the legislation of the 1899 nationality law reveals that Japan had potentials for developing citizenship criteria with an emphasis on birthplace (jus soli) and residence (jus domicili) just as those in Britain and France. Yet a relatively strict system of jus sanguims, as in Germany, was instituted. The paper identifies other determinants of the principle of citizenship, including legal practices prior to the emergence of the modern state, the state's efforts to organize the populations subject to its rule, and domestic and international security concerns.",
author = "Chikako Kashiwazaki",
year = "1998",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
journal = "International Journal of Comparative Sociology",
issn = "0020-7152",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jus Sanguinis in Japan the Origin of Citizenship in a Comparative Perspective

AU - Kashiwazaki, Chikako

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - This paper examines the origin of jus sanguinis (citizenship attribution by parentage) in Japan as an illustration of the emergence of membership criteria in the modern state. Three European cases-Britain, France and Germany-provide a comparative perspective. Previous literature has tended to associate jus sangiunis with ethnic nationalism or an ethnocultural understanding of the nation. In fact, the principle of citizenship that emphasizes descent rather than birthplace appears to fit well with the image of the ethnically exclusive nature of contemporary Japanese society. However, I will argue that in Japan, as in the three European countries, the initial adoption of particular membership criteria had little to do with conceptions of nationhood or nationalism. An analysis of the factors leading to the legislation of the 1899 nationality law reveals that Japan had potentials for developing citizenship criteria with an emphasis on birthplace (jus soli) and residence (jus domicili) just as those in Britain and France. Yet a relatively strict system of jus sanguims, as in Germany, was instituted. The paper identifies other determinants of the principle of citizenship, including legal practices prior to the emergence of the modern state, the state's efforts to organize the populations subject to its rule, and domestic and international security concerns.

AB - This paper examines the origin of jus sanguinis (citizenship attribution by parentage) in Japan as an illustration of the emergence of membership criteria in the modern state. Three European cases-Britain, France and Germany-provide a comparative perspective. Previous literature has tended to associate jus sangiunis with ethnic nationalism or an ethnocultural understanding of the nation. In fact, the principle of citizenship that emphasizes descent rather than birthplace appears to fit well with the image of the ethnically exclusive nature of contemporary Japanese society. However, I will argue that in Japan, as in the three European countries, the initial adoption of particular membership criteria had little to do with conceptions of nationhood or nationalism. An analysis of the factors leading to the legislation of the 1899 nationality law reveals that Japan had potentials for developing citizenship criteria with an emphasis on birthplace (jus soli) and residence (jus domicili) just as those in Britain and France. Yet a relatively strict system of jus sanguims, as in Germany, was instituted. The paper identifies other determinants of the principle of citizenship, including legal practices prior to the emergence of the modern state, the state's efforts to organize the populations subject to its rule, and domestic and international security concerns.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031769804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031769804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031769804

VL - 39

JO - International Journal of Comparative Sociology

JF - International Journal of Comparative Sociology

SN - 0020-7152

IS - 3

ER -