TY - JOUR
T1 - K-line (−) in the neck-flexed position affects surgical outcomes in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament after muscle-preserving selective laminectomy
AU - Nori, Satoshi
AU - Aoyama, Ryoma
AU - Ninomiya, Ken
AU - Suzuki, Satoshi
AU - Anazawa, Ukei
AU - Shiraishi, Tateru
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - Background: Posterior cervical decompression results in favorable outcomes for K-line (+) ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) patients. However, even for patients with K-line (+) in the neck neutral position, K-line (−) in the neck-flexed position (flexion K-line (−)) may affect surgical outcomes. We investigated the influence of flexion K-line (−) on surgical outcomes after muscle-preserving selective laminectomy using multivariate analysis. Methods: This study involved 113 OPLL patients with K-line (+) in the neck neutral position who underwent muscle-preserving selective laminectomy. Patients were divided into flexion K-line (+) (n = 90) and flexion K-line (−) (n = 23) groups. We analyzed the influence of a flexion K-line (−) on radiological and surgical outcomes. We conducted a multivariate analysis to analyze the factors affecting surgical outcomes. Results: The patients with a flexion K-line (−) had a larger C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (preoperatively, P = 0.042; postoperatively, P = 0.021), narrower postoperative clearance of the spinal cord (P = 0.003), a smaller proportion of segmental-type OPLL (P < 0.001), and a greater OPLL occupancy ratio (P < 0.001). The recovery rate measured by the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was poorer in patients with a flexion K-line (−) (17.6 ± 32.2%) than in those with a flexion K-line (+) (35.3 ± 29.5%) (P = 0.013). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the flexion K-line (−) affected the recovery rate of the JOA score (β = −0.233, P = 0.013). Conclusions: Even for patients with K-line (+) OPLL, the flexion K-line (−) affects surgical outcomes. The flexion K-line (−) is a useful predictor of poor surgical outcomes after posterior decompression surgery.
AB - Background: Posterior cervical decompression results in favorable outcomes for K-line (+) ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) patients. However, even for patients with K-line (+) in the neck neutral position, K-line (−) in the neck-flexed position (flexion K-line (−)) may affect surgical outcomes. We investigated the influence of flexion K-line (−) on surgical outcomes after muscle-preserving selective laminectomy using multivariate analysis. Methods: This study involved 113 OPLL patients with K-line (+) in the neck neutral position who underwent muscle-preserving selective laminectomy. Patients were divided into flexion K-line (+) (n = 90) and flexion K-line (−) (n = 23) groups. We analyzed the influence of a flexion K-line (−) on radiological and surgical outcomes. We conducted a multivariate analysis to analyze the factors affecting surgical outcomes. Results: The patients with a flexion K-line (−) had a larger C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (preoperatively, P = 0.042; postoperatively, P = 0.021), narrower postoperative clearance of the spinal cord (P = 0.003), a smaller proportion of segmental-type OPLL (P < 0.001), and a greater OPLL occupancy ratio (P < 0.001). The recovery rate measured by the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was poorer in patients with a flexion K-line (−) (17.6 ± 32.2%) than in those with a flexion K-line (+) (35.3 ± 29.5%) (P = 0.013). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the flexion K-line (−) affected the recovery rate of the JOA score (β = −0.233, P = 0.013). Conclusions: Even for patients with K-line (+) OPLL, the flexion K-line (−) affects surgical outcomes. The flexion K-line (−) is a useful predictor of poor surgical outcomes after posterior decompression surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074337221&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074337221&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jos.2019.10.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jos.2019.10.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 31672381
AN - SCOPUS:85074337221
VL - 25
SP - 770
EP - 775
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
SN - 0949-2658
IS - 5
ER -