Laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection: Technique, indications and results

Osamu Itano, Naokazu Chiba, Shingo Maeda, Hideo Matsui, Go Oshima, Takeyuki Wada, Takashi Nakayama, Hideki Ishikawa, Yasumasa Koyama, Yuukou Kitagawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Purpose: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the short-term results of laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection. Methods: We analyzed the clinical outcome in 17 patients (mean age 70 ± 8 years) who had undergone laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection from March 2006 to December 2008. Preoperative diagnoses were HCC in 13 patients and metastasis of colon cancer in 4. The operation consisted of laparoscopic mobilization of the target liver lobe, followed by open liver resection through a 7- to 10-cm extraction site. Results: Mean tumor size was 3.0 ± 1.1 cm (range 1.2-5 cm). The mean operative time was 362 ± 85 min. The mean blood loss was 451 ± 413 ml, and no blood transfusion was required in any patient. There were no intraoperative complications, and conversion to laparotomy was needed in one case. Postoperative complications developed in 4 cases (4 infections, 24%), all of which were improved by conservative management. However, there was no postoperative mortality. None of the patients had any peritoneal carcinomatosis or port-site or resection site recurrence during a mean follow-up of 18 ± 9.6 months. According to the analysis of the tumor location, the criterion for an adequate tumor location in the right lobe for this operation was set with the tumor at a distance of more than 5 cm from the inferior vena cava and the root of the hepatic vein (5 cm rule). Conclusion: Laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection is feasible and well tolerated. Accumulation of more data may be needed for evaluation of long-term outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)711-719
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Nov

Fingerprint

Liver
Neoplasms
Hepatic Veins
Intraoperative Complications
Inferior Vena Cava
Operative Time
Blood Transfusion
Colonic Neoplasms
Laparotomy
Neoplasm Metastasis
Carcinoma
Recurrence
Mortality
Infection
Conservative Treatment

Keywords

  • Indication
  • Laparoscopic-assisted
  • Limited liver resection
  • Partial hepatectomy
  • Technique

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Hepatology

Cite this

Laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection : Technique, indications and results. / Itano, Osamu; Chiba, Naokazu; Maeda, Shingo; Matsui, Hideo; Oshima, Go; Wada, Takeyuki; Nakayama, Takashi; Ishikawa, Hideki; Koyama, Yasumasa; Kitagawa, Yuukou.

In: Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Vol. 16, No. 6, 11.2009, p. 711-719.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Itano, Osamu ; Chiba, Naokazu ; Maeda, Shingo ; Matsui, Hideo ; Oshima, Go ; Wada, Takeyuki ; Nakayama, Takashi ; Ishikawa, Hideki ; Koyama, Yasumasa ; Kitagawa, Yuukou. / Laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection : Technique, indications and results. In: Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 16, No. 6. pp. 711-719.
@article{3ba504c3fe0c4f4c964b11760b548f79,
title = "Laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection: Technique, indications and results",
abstract = "Background/Purpose: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the short-term results of laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection. Methods: We analyzed the clinical outcome in 17 patients (mean age 70 ± 8 years) who had undergone laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection from March 2006 to December 2008. Preoperative diagnoses were HCC in 13 patients and metastasis of colon cancer in 4. The operation consisted of laparoscopic mobilization of the target liver lobe, followed by open liver resection through a 7- to 10-cm extraction site. Results: Mean tumor size was 3.0 ± 1.1 cm (range 1.2-5 cm). The mean operative time was 362 ± 85 min. The mean blood loss was 451 ± 413 ml, and no blood transfusion was required in any patient. There were no intraoperative complications, and conversion to laparotomy was needed in one case. Postoperative complications developed in 4 cases (4 infections, 24{\%}), all of which were improved by conservative management. However, there was no postoperative mortality. None of the patients had any peritoneal carcinomatosis or port-site or resection site recurrence during a mean follow-up of 18 ± 9.6 months. According to the analysis of the tumor location, the criterion for an adequate tumor location in the right lobe for this operation was set with the tumor at a distance of more than 5 cm from the inferior vena cava and the root of the hepatic vein (5 cm rule). Conclusion: Laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection is feasible and well tolerated. Accumulation of more data may be needed for evaluation of long-term outcome.",
keywords = "Indication, Laparoscopic-assisted, Limited liver resection, Partial hepatectomy, Technique",
author = "Osamu Itano and Naokazu Chiba and Shingo Maeda and Hideo Matsui and Go Oshima and Takeyuki Wada and Takashi Nakayama and Hideki Ishikawa and Yasumasa Koyama and Yuukou Kitagawa",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s00534-009-0141-3",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "711--719",
journal = "Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences",
issn = "1868-6974",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection

T2 - Technique, indications and results

AU - Itano, Osamu

AU - Chiba, Naokazu

AU - Maeda, Shingo

AU - Matsui, Hideo

AU - Oshima, Go

AU - Wada, Takeyuki

AU - Nakayama, Takashi

AU - Ishikawa, Hideki

AU - Koyama, Yasumasa

AU - Kitagawa, Yuukou

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - Background/Purpose: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the short-term results of laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection. Methods: We analyzed the clinical outcome in 17 patients (mean age 70 ± 8 years) who had undergone laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection from March 2006 to December 2008. Preoperative diagnoses were HCC in 13 patients and metastasis of colon cancer in 4. The operation consisted of laparoscopic mobilization of the target liver lobe, followed by open liver resection through a 7- to 10-cm extraction site. Results: Mean tumor size was 3.0 ± 1.1 cm (range 1.2-5 cm). The mean operative time was 362 ± 85 min. The mean blood loss was 451 ± 413 ml, and no blood transfusion was required in any patient. There were no intraoperative complications, and conversion to laparotomy was needed in one case. Postoperative complications developed in 4 cases (4 infections, 24%), all of which were improved by conservative management. However, there was no postoperative mortality. None of the patients had any peritoneal carcinomatosis or port-site or resection site recurrence during a mean follow-up of 18 ± 9.6 months. According to the analysis of the tumor location, the criterion for an adequate tumor location in the right lobe for this operation was set with the tumor at a distance of more than 5 cm from the inferior vena cava and the root of the hepatic vein (5 cm rule). Conclusion: Laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection is feasible and well tolerated. Accumulation of more data may be needed for evaluation of long-term outcome.

AB - Background/Purpose: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the short-term results of laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection. Methods: We analyzed the clinical outcome in 17 patients (mean age 70 ± 8 years) who had undergone laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection from March 2006 to December 2008. Preoperative diagnoses were HCC in 13 patients and metastasis of colon cancer in 4. The operation consisted of laparoscopic mobilization of the target liver lobe, followed by open liver resection through a 7- to 10-cm extraction site. Results: Mean tumor size was 3.0 ± 1.1 cm (range 1.2-5 cm). The mean operative time was 362 ± 85 min. The mean blood loss was 451 ± 413 ml, and no blood transfusion was required in any patient. There were no intraoperative complications, and conversion to laparotomy was needed in one case. Postoperative complications developed in 4 cases (4 infections, 24%), all of which were improved by conservative management. However, there was no postoperative mortality. None of the patients had any peritoneal carcinomatosis or port-site or resection site recurrence during a mean follow-up of 18 ± 9.6 months. According to the analysis of the tumor location, the criterion for an adequate tumor location in the right lobe for this operation was set with the tumor at a distance of more than 5 cm from the inferior vena cava and the root of the hepatic vein (5 cm rule). Conclusion: Laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection is feasible and well tolerated. Accumulation of more data may be needed for evaluation of long-term outcome.

KW - Indication

KW - Laparoscopic-assisted

KW - Limited liver resection

KW - Partial hepatectomy

KW - Technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72449171505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72449171505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00534-009-0141-3

DO - 10.1007/s00534-009-0141-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 19588067

AN - SCOPUS:72449171505

VL - 16

SP - 711

EP - 719

JO - Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

JF - Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

SN - 1868-6974

IS - 6

ER -