Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis

Hirotoshi Hasegawa, Masahiko Watanabe, Hideo Baba, Hideki Nishibori, Masaki Kitajima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Significant concern continues about the feasibility of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy (RP) with an ileal J pouch anal anastomosis in the surgical treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to clarify the feasibility of laparoscopic RP at a single institution where the surgical routine of laparoscopic colorectal surgery has already been established. Patients and Methods: Between July 1994 and December 2001, 18 patients with UC underwent laparoscopic RP. The median age was 30 (range, 18-51) years, and the median follow-up was 20 (range, 5-89) months. Five trocars were placed. After the entire colon and rectum were mobilized and the vessels were divided intracorporeally, the rectum was divided with use of a laparoscopic linear stapler. A pouch anal anastomosis was fashioned with use of a double stapling technique. A diverting loop ileostomy was fashioned. Results: There were no conversions to the open procedure. The median operative time and median blood loss were 360 (range, 290-500) minutes and 105 (range, 10-586) mL, respectively. Six postoperative complications occurred (wound sepsis, 2; bowel obstruction, 1; anastomotic stricture, 2; pouchitis, 1). In one patient, a bowel obstruction developed 3 months after the operation, which was managed conservatively. The median length of the hospital stay was 9 (range, 7-21) days. Conclusions: The laparoscopic RP is safe and feasible in selected patients with UC. New laparoscopic instrumentation, such as a linear stapler, and a more reliable laparoscopic coagulating and dividing tool should be designed, which would make it possible to perform this procedure more frequently in the surgical treatment of UC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)403-406
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A
Volume12
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2002 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Restorative Proctocolectomy
Ulcerative Colitis
Colonic Pouches
Rectum
Length of Stay
Surgical Anastomosis
Pouchitis
Conversion to Open Surgery
Ileostomy
Colorectal Surgery
Operative Time
Surgical Instruments
Laparoscopy
Sepsis
Pathologic Constriction
Colon
Wounds and Injuries
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis. / Hasegawa, Hirotoshi; Watanabe, Masahiko; Baba, Hideo; Nishibori, Hideki; Kitajima, Masaki.

In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A, Vol. 12, No. 6, 01.12.2002, p. 403-406.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hasegawa, H, Watanabe, M, Baba, H, Nishibori, H & Kitajima, M 2002, 'Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis', Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 403-406.
Hasegawa, Hirotoshi ; Watanabe, Masahiko ; Baba, Hideo ; Nishibori, Hideki ; Kitajima, Masaki. / Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis. In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A. 2002 ; Vol. 12, No. 6. pp. 403-406.
@article{f147b18b08264942a0a5e605e006bc65,
title = "Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis",
abstract = "Background: Significant concern continues about the feasibility of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy (RP) with an ileal J pouch anal anastomosis in the surgical treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to clarify the feasibility of laparoscopic RP at a single institution where the surgical routine of laparoscopic colorectal surgery has already been established. Patients and Methods: Between July 1994 and December 2001, 18 patients with UC underwent laparoscopic RP. The median age was 30 (range, 18-51) years, and the median follow-up was 20 (range, 5-89) months. Five trocars were placed. After the entire colon and rectum were mobilized and the vessels were divided intracorporeally, the rectum was divided with use of a laparoscopic linear stapler. A pouch anal anastomosis was fashioned with use of a double stapling technique. A diverting loop ileostomy was fashioned. Results: There were no conversions to the open procedure. The median operative time and median blood loss were 360 (range, 290-500) minutes and 105 (range, 10-586) mL, respectively. Six postoperative complications occurred (wound sepsis, 2; bowel obstruction, 1; anastomotic stricture, 2; pouchitis, 1). In one patient, a bowel obstruction developed 3 months after the operation, which was managed conservatively. The median length of the hospital stay was 9 (range, 7-21) days. Conclusions: The laparoscopic RP is safe and feasible in selected patients with UC. New laparoscopic instrumentation, such as a linear stapler, and a more reliable laparoscopic coagulating and dividing tool should be designed, which would make it possible to perform this procedure more frequently in the surgical treatment of UC.",
author = "Hirotoshi Hasegawa and Masahiko Watanabe and Hideo Baba and Hideki Nishibori and Masaki Kitajima",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "403--406",
journal = "Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques",
issn = "1092-6429",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis

AU - Hasegawa, Hirotoshi

AU - Watanabe, Masahiko

AU - Baba, Hideo

AU - Nishibori, Hideki

AU - Kitajima, Masaki

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - Background: Significant concern continues about the feasibility of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy (RP) with an ileal J pouch anal anastomosis in the surgical treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to clarify the feasibility of laparoscopic RP at a single institution where the surgical routine of laparoscopic colorectal surgery has already been established. Patients and Methods: Between July 1994 and December 2001, 18 patients with UC underwent laparoscopic RP. The median age was 30 (range, 18-51) years, and the median follow-up was 20 (range, 5-89) months. Five trocars were placed. After the entire colon and rectum were mobilized and the vessels were divided intracorporeally, the rectum was divided with use of a laparoscopic linear stapler. A pouch anal anastomosis was fashioned with use of a double stapling technique. A diverting loop ileostomy was fashioned. Results: There were no conversions to the open procedure. The median operative time and median blood loss were 360 (range, 290-500) minutes and 105 (range, 10-586) mL, respectively. Six postoperative complications occurred (wound sepsis, 2; bowel obstruction, 1; anastomotic stricture, 2; pouchitis, 1). In one patient, a bowel obstruction developed 3 months after the operation, which was managed conservatively. The median length of the hospital stay was 9 (range, 7-21) days. Conclusions: The laparoscopic RP is safe and feasible in selected patients with UC. New laparoscopic instrumentation, such as a linear stapler, and a more reliable laparoscopic coagulating and dividing tool should be designed, which would make it possible to perform this procedure more frequently in the surgical treatment of UC.

AB - Background: Significant concern continues about the feasibility of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy (RP) with an ileal J pouch anal anastomosis in the surgical treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to clarify the feasibility of laparoscopic RP at a single institution where the surgical routine of laparoscopic colorectal surgery has already been established. Patients and Methods: Between July 1994 and December 2001, 18 patients with UC underwent laparoscopic RP. The median age was 30 (range, 18-51) years, and the median follow-up was 20 (range, 5-89) months. Five trocars were placed. After the entire colon and rectum were mobilized and the vessels were divided intracorporeally, the rectum was divided with use of a laparoscopic linear stapler. A pouch anal anastomosis was fashioned with use of a double stapling technique. A diverting loop ileostomy was fashioned. Results: There were no conversions to the open procedure. The median operative time and median blood loss were 360 (range, 290-500) minutes and 105 (range, 10-586) mL, respectively. Six postoperative complications occurred (wound sepsis, 2; bowel obstruction, 1; anastomotic stricture, 2; pouchitis, 1). In one patient, a bowel obstruction developed 3 months after the operation, which was managed conservatively. The median length of the hospital stay was 9 (range, 7-21) days. Conclusions: The laparoscopic RP is safe and feasible in selected patients with UC. New laparoscopic instrumentation, such as a linear stapler, and a more reliable laparoscopic coagulating and dividing tool should be designed, which would make it possible to perform this procedure more frequently in the surgical treatment of UC.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036959359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036959359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 403

EP - 406

JO - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

JF - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

SN - 1092-6429

IS - 6

ER -