Latent structure of self-reported depression in undergraduates: Using taxometric procedures and information-theoretic latent variable modeling

Yasuyuki Okumura, Shinji Sakamoto, Atsuko Tomoda, Nobuhiko Kijima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many depression studies dichotomize the participants as depressed or nondepressed on the basis of a self-reported depression scale score. However, there is little statistical rationale for such a procedure. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether depression assessed by the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) is categorical or dimensional by using taxometric procedures and information-theoretic latent variable modeling. The present sample comprises 2187 Japanese undergraduates. The latent structure of depression was evaluated by mean above minus below a cut (MAMBAC) and maximum eigenvalue (MAXEIG). In addition, in order to test convergent validity, we performed information-theoretic latent variable modeling. Both taxometric procedures (MAMBAC and MAXEIG) and information-theoretic latent variable modeling, using indicators drawn from the SDS, were consistent with the dimensional latent structure of depression. The latent structure of depression assessed by the SDS is dimensional in undergraduates. For the assessment of depression, researchers should not stratify the participants on the basis of a conventional cutoff score. In addition, it is recommended that researchers use correlational designs, which include individuals with a wider range of severity with regard to depressive symptoms, rather than group comparative research designs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)166-171
Number of pages6
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Jan

Fingerprint

Depression
Research Personnel
Research Design

Keywords

  • Analogue study
  • Continuity issue
  • Depression
  • Taxometric
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Latent structure of self-reported depression in undergraduates : Using taxometric procedures and information-theoretic latent variable modeling. / Okumura, Yasuyuki; Sakamoto, Shinji; Tomoda, Atsuko; Kijima, Nobuhiko.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 46, No. 2, 01.2009, p. 166-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{93d55fa107704a73b06d50f494641b81,
title = "Latent structure of self-reported depression in undergraduates: Using taxometric procedures and information-theoretic latent variable modeling",
abstract = "Many depression studies dichotomize the participants as depressed or nondepressed on the basis of a self-reported depression scale score. However, there is little statistical rationale for such a procedure. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether depression assessed by the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) is categorical or dimensional by using taxometric procedures and information-theoretic latent variable modeling. The present sample comprises 2187 Japanese undergraduates. The latent structure of depression was evaluated by mean above minus below a cut (MAMBAC) and maximum eigenvalue (MAXEIG). In addition, in order to test convergent validity, we performed information-theoretic latent variable modeling. Both taxometric procedures (MAMBAC and MAXEIG) and information-theoretic latent variable modeling, using indicators drawn from the SDS, were consistent with the dimensional latent structure of depression. The latent structure of depression assessed by the SDS is dimensional in undergraduates. For the assessment of depression, researchers should not stratify the participants on the basis of a conventional cutoff score. In addition, it is recommended that researchers use correlational designs, which include individuals with a wider range of severity with regard to depressive symptoms, rather than group comparative research designs.",
keywords = "Analogue study, Continuity issue, Depression, Taxometric, Validity",
author = "Yasuyuki Okumura and Shinji Sakamoto and Atsuko Tomoda and Nobuhiko Kijima",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.021",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "166--171",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Latent structure of self-reported depression in undergraduates

T2 - Using taxometric procedures and information-theoretic latent variable modeling

AU - Okumura, Yasuyuki

AU - Sakamoto, Shinji

AU - Tomoda, Atsuko

AU - Kijima, Nobuhiko

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - Many depression studies dichotomize the participants as depressed or nondepressed on the basis of a self-reported depression scale score. However, there is little statistical rationale for such a procedure. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether depression assessed by the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) is categorical or dimensional by using taxometric procedures and information-theoretic latent variable modeling. The present sample comprises 2187 Japanese undergraduates. The latent structure of depression was evaluated by mean above minus below a cut (MAMBAC) and maximum eigenvalue (MAXEIG). In addition, in order to test convergent validity, we performed information-theoretic latent variable modeling. Both taxometric procedures (MAMBAC and MAXEIG) and information-theoretic latent variable modeling, using indicators drawn from the SDS, were consistent with the dimensional latent structure of depression. The latent structure of depression assessed by the SDS is dimensional in undergraduates. For the assessment of depression, researchers should not stratify the participants on the basis of a conventional cutoff score. In addition, it is recommended that researchers use correlational designs, which include individuals with a wider range of severity with regard to depressive symptoms, rather than group comparative research designs.

AB - Many depression studies dichotomize the participants as depressed or nondepressed on the basis of a self-reported depression scale score. However, there is little statistical rationale for such a procedure. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether depression assessed by the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) is categorical or dimensional by using taxometric procedures and information-theoretic latent variable modeling. The present sample comprises 2187 Japanese undergraduates. The latent structure of depression was evaluated by mean above minus below a cut (MAMBAC) and maximum eigenvalue (MAXEIG). In addition, in order to test convergent validity, we performed information-theoretic latent variable modeling. Both taxometric procedures (MAMBAC and MAXEIG) and information-theoretic latent variable modeling, using indicators drawn from the SDS, were consistent with the dimensional latent structure of depression. The latent structure of depression assessed by the SDS is dimensional in undergraduates. For the assessment of depression, researchers should not stratify the participants on the basis of a conventional cutoff score. In addition, it is recommended that researchers use correlational designs, which include individuals with a wider range of severity with regard to depressive symptoms, rather than group comparative research designs.

KW - Analogue study

KW - Continuity issue

KW - Depression

KW - Taxometric

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56649124625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56649124625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.021

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.021

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:56649124625

VL - 46

SP - 166

EP - 171

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 2

ER -