Let's take a break: Trends and cycles in US real GDP

Pierre Perron, Tatsuma Wada

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Trend-cycle decompositions for US real GDP such as the unobserved components models, the Beveridge-Nelson decomposition, the Hodrick-Prescott filter and others yield very different cycles which bear little resemblance to the NBER chronology, ascribes much movements to the trend leaving little to the cycle, and some imply a negative correlation between the noise to the cycle and the trend. We argue that these features are artifacts created by the neglect of a change in the slope of the trend function. Once this is accounted for, all methods yield the same cycle with a trend that is non-stochastic except for a few periods around 1973. The cycle is more important in magnitude than previously reported and it accords well with the NBER chronology. Our results are corroborated using an alternative trend-cycle decomposition based on a generalized unobserved components models with errors having a mixture of normals distribution for both the slope of the trend function and the cyclical component.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)749-765
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Monetary Economics
Volume56
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Sep
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Trend breaks
Real GDP
Chronology
Trend-cycle decomposition
Unobserved components model
Hodrick-Prescott filter
Neglect
Beveridge-Nelson decomposition
Normal distribution

Keywords

  • Beveridge-Nelson decomposition
  • Non-Gaussian filtering
  • Structural change
  • Trend-cycle decomposition
  • Unobserved components model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Finance

Cite this

Let's take a break : Trends and cycles in US real GDP. / Perron, Pierre; Wada, Tatsuma.

In: Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 56, No. 6, 09.2009, p. 749-765.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9bc7e1894915433b9cd98bf3491ccd4a,
title = "Let's take a break: Trends and cycles in US real GDP",
abstract = "Trend-cycle decompositions for US real GDP such as the unobserved components models, the Beveridge-Nelson decomposition, the Hodrick-Prescott filter and others yield very different cycles which bear little resemblance to the NBER chronology, ascribes much movements to the trend leaving little to the cycle, and some imply a negative correlation between the noise to the cycle and the trend. We argue that these features are artifacts created by the neglect of a change in the slope of the trend function. Once this is accounted for, all methods yield the same cycle with a trend that is non-stochastic except for a few periods around 1973. The cycle is more important in magnitude than previously reported and it accords well with the NBER chronology. Our results are corroborated using an alternative trend-cycle decomposition based on a generalized unobserved components models with errors having a mixture of normals distribution for both the slope of the trend function and the cyclical component.",
keywords = "Beveridge-Nelson decomposition, Non-Gaussian filtering, Structural change, Trend-cycle decomposition, Unobserved components model",
author = "Pierre Perron and Tatsuma Wada",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmoneco.2009.08.001",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "749--765",
journal = "Journal of Monetary Economics",
issn = "0304-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Let's take a break

T2 - Trends and cycles in US real GDP

AU - Perron, Pierre

AU - Wada, Tatsuma

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Trend-cycle decompositions for US real GDP such as the unobserved components models, the Beveridge-Nelson decomposition, the Hodrick-Prescott filter and others yield very different cycles which bear little resemblance to the NBER chronology, ascribes much movements to the trend leaving little to the cycle, and some imply a negative correlation between the noise to the cycle and the trend. We argue that these features are artifacts created by the neglect of a change in the slope of the trend function. Once this is accounted for, all methods yield the same cycle with a trend that is non-stochastic except for a few periods around 1973. The cycle is more important in magnitude than previously reported and it accords well with the NBER chronology. Our results are corroborated using an alternative trend-cycle decomposition based on a generalized unobserved components models with errors having a mixture of normals distribution for both the slope of the trend function and the cyclical component.

AB - Trend-cycle decompositions for US real GDP such as the unobserved components models, the Beveridge-Nelson decomposition, the Hodrick-Prescott filter and others yield very different cycles which bear little resemblance to the NBER chronology, ascribes much movements to the trend leaving little to the cycle, and some imply a negative correlation between the noise to the cycle and the trend. We argue that these features are artifacts created by the neglect of a change in the slope of the trend function. Once this is accounted for, all methods yield the same cycle with a trend that is non-stochastic except for a few periods around 1973. The cycle is more important in magnitude than previously reported and it accords well with the NBER chronology. Our results are corroborated using an alternative trend-cycle decomposition based on a generalized unobserved components models with errors having a mixture of normals distribution for both the slope of the trend function and the cyclical component.

KW - Beveridge-Nelson decomposition

KW - Non-Gaussian filtering

KW - Structural change

KW - Trend-cycle decomposition

KW - Unobserved components model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349112613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349112613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2009.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2009.08.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70349112613

VL - 56

SP - 749

EP - 765

JO - Journal of Monetary Economics

JF - Journal of Monetary Economics

SN - 0304-3932

IS - 6

ER -