Life sustaining treatment at end-of-life in Japan

Do the perspectives of the general public reflect those of the bereaved of patients who had died in hospitals?

Naoki Ikegami, Sumie Ikezaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the perspectives of the general public and of the bereaved of patients who had died in hospitals on life sustaining treatment (LST). Method: Two self-administered questionnaire surveys were conducted in a city in Japan. The general public survey was mailed to a stratified sample of 1000 residents aged 20 and over, of which 419 (42%) responded. The bereaved survey was mailed to 427 family members of patients who had died in the city's 6 hospitals, of which 205 (48%) responded. Results: In the general public survey, 44% had discussed LST with their family; 30% thought physicians discussed them with the patient or family; if a family member were to have cancer 57% did not want LST, if frail, 69%. In the bereaved survey, 39% had discussed LST with the patient; 80% had the respondent's preferences followed by the physician; 23% had not wanted LST for cancer, 39% for a frail condition. Conclusion: The LST preferences of a family member were known by less than half of the respondents in both surveys. When compared with the general public, the bereaved evaluated the physician's attitude more positively and the proportion who did not want LST was less.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-106
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Policy
Volume98
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Dec

Fingerprint

Japan
Therapeutics
Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires
Urban Hospitals
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Bereaved family members
  • End-of-life care
  • Life sustaining treatment
  • Living will

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Life sustaining treatment at end-of-life in Japan : Do the perspectives of the general public reflect those of the bereaved of patients who had died in hospitals? / Ikegami, Naoki; Ikezaki, Sumie.

In: Health Policy, Vol. 98, No. 2-3, 12.2010, p. 98-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5736d06e631a4c529be68a404bd47dfb,
title = "Life sustaining treatment at end-of-life in Japan: Do the perspectives of the general public reflect those of the bereaved of patients who had died in hospitals?",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the perspectives of the general public and of the bereaved of patients who had died in hospitals on life sustaining treatment (LST). Method: Two self-administered questionnaire surveys were conducted in a city in Japan. The general public survey was mailed to a stratified sample of 1000 residents aged 20 and over, of which 419 (42{\%}) responded. The bereaved survey was mailed to 427 family members of patients who had died in the city's 6 hospitals, of which 205 (48{\%}) responded. Results: In the general public survey, 44{\%} had discussed LST with their family; 30{\%} thought physicians discussed them with the patient or family; if a family member were to have cancer 57{\%} did not want LST, if frail, 69{\%}. In the bereaved survey, 39{\%} had discussed LST with the patient; 80{\%} had the respondent's preferences followed by the physician; 23{\%} had not wanted LST for cancer, 39{\%} for a frail condition. Conclusion: The LST preferences of a family member were known by less than half of the respondents in both surveys. When compared with the general public, the bereaved evaluated the physician's attitude more positively and the proportion who did not want LST was less.",
keywords = "Bereaved family members, End-of-life care, Life sustaining treatment, Living will",
author = "Naoki Ikegami and Sumie Ikezaki",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.016",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "98--106",
journal = "Health Policy",
issn = "0168-8510",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Life sustaining treatment at end-of-life in Japan

T2 - Do the perspectives of the general public reflect those of the bereaved of patients who had died in hospitals?

AU - Ikegami, Naoki

AU - Ikezaki, Sumie

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Objective: To compare the perspectives of the general public and of the bereaved of patients who had died in hospitals on life sustaining treatment (LST). Method: Two self-administered questionnaire surveys were conducted in a city in Japan. The general public survey was mailed to a stratified sample of 1000 residents aged 20 and over, of which 419 (42%) responded. The bereaved survey was mailed to 427 family members of patients who had died in the city's 6 hospitals, of which 205 (48%) responded. Results: In the general public survey, 44% had discussed LST with their family; 30% thought physicians discussed them with the patient or family; if a family member were to have cancer 57% did not want LST, if frail, 69%. In the bereaved survey, 39% had discussed LST with the patient; 80% had the respondent's preferences followed by the physician; 23% had not wanted LST for cancer, 39% for a frail condition. Conclusion: The LST preferences of a family member were known by less than half of the respondents in both surveys. When compared with the general public, the bereaved evaluated the physician's attitude more positively and the proportion who did not want LST was less.

AB - Objective: To compare the perspectives of the general public and of the bereaved of patients who had died in hospitals on life sustaining treatment (LST). Method: Two self-administered questionnaire surveys were conducted in a city in Japan. The general public survey was mailed to a stratified sample of 1000 residents aged 20 and over, of which 419 (42%) responded. The bereaved survey was mailed to 427 family members of patients who had died in the city's 6 hospitals, of which 205 (48%) responded. Results: In the general public survey, 44% had discussed LST with their family; 30% thought physicians discussed them with the patient or family; if a family member were to have cancer 57% did not want LST, if frail, 69%. In the bereaved survey, 39% had discussed LST with the patient; 80% had the respondent's preferences followed by the physician; 23% had not wanted LST for cancer, 39% for a frail condition. Conclusion: The LST preferences of a family member were known by less than half of the respondents in both surveys. When compared with the general public, the bereaved evaluated the physician's attitude more positively and the proportion who did not want LST was less.

KW - Bereaved family members

KW - End-of-life care

KW - Life sustaining treatment

KW - Living will

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78249242068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78249242068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.016

DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.016

M3 - Article

VL - 98

SP - 98

EP - 106

JO - Health Policy

JF - Health Policy

SN - 0168-8510

IS - 2-3

ER -