Looking represents choosing in toddlers: Exploring the equivalence between multimodal measures in forced-choice tasks

Hiromichi Hagihara, Naoto Ienaga, Kei Terayama, Yusuke Moriguchi, Masa aki Sakagami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) paradigm, manual responses such as pointing have been widely used as measures to estimate cognitive abilities. While pointing measurements can be easily collected, coded, analyzed, and interpreted, absent responses are often observed particularly when adopting these measures for toddler studies, which leads to an increase of missing data. Although looking responses such as preferential looking can be available as alternative measures in such cases, it is unknown how well looking measurements can be interpreted as equivalent to manual ones. This study aimed to answer this question by investigating how accurately pointing responses (i.e., left or right) could be predicted from concurrent preferential looking. Using pre-existing videos of toddlers aged 18–23 months engaged in an intermodal word comprehension task, we developed models predicting manual from looking responses. Results showed substantial prediction accuracy for both the Simple Majority Vote and Machine Learning-Based classifiers, which indicates that looking responses would be reasonable alternative measures of manual ones. However, the further exploratory analysis revealed that when applying the created models for data of toddlers who did not produce clear pointing responses, the estimation agreement of missing pointing between the models and the human coders slightly dropped. This indicates that looking responses without pointing were qualitatively different from those with pointing. Bridging two measurements in forced-choice tasks would help researchers avoid wasting collected data due to the absence of manual responses and interpret results from different modalities comprehensively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)148-167
Number of pages20
JournalInfancy
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021 Jan

Keywords

  • language development
  • machine learning
  • pointing
  • preferential looking
  • two-alternative forced-choice task

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Looking represents choosing in toddlers: Exploring the equivalence between multimodal measures in forced-choice tasks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this