Looking to score

The dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene

Shuichiro Taya, David Windridge, Magda Osman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several studies have reported that task instructions influence eye-movement behavior during static image observation. In contrast, during dynamic scene observation we show that while the specificity of the goal of a task influences observers' beliefs about where they look, the goal does not in turn influence eye-movement patterns. In our study observers watched short video clips of a single tennis match and were asked to make subjective judgments about the allocation of visual attention to the items presented in the clip (e.g., ball, players, court lines, and umpire). However, before attending to the clips, observers were either told to simply watch clips (non-specific goal), or they were told to watch the clips with a view to judging which of the two tennis players was awarded the point (specific goal). The results of subjective reports suggest that observers believed that they allocated their attention more to goal-related items (e.g. court lines) if they performed the goal-specific task. However, we did not find the effect of goal specificity on major eye-movement parameters (i.e., saccadic amplitudes, inter-saccadic intervals, and gaze coherence). We conclude that the specificity of a task goal can alter observer's beliefs about their attention allocation strategy, but such task-driven meta-attentional modulation does not necessarily correlate with eye-movement behavior.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere39060
JournalPLoS One
Volume7
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jun 29
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Eye movements
Eye Movements
eyes
Surgical Instruments
Tennis
Observation
Modulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Looking to score : The dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene. / Taya, Shuichiro; Windridge, David; Osman, Magda.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 7, No. 6, e39060, 29.06.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{65b41d1d76d94541acc15159fe55ee31,
title = "Looking to score: The dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene",
abstract = "Several studies have reported that task instructions influence eye-movement behavior during static image observation. In contrast, during dynamic scene observation we show that while the specificity of the goal of a task influences observers' beliefs about where they look, the goal does not in turn influence eye-movement patterns. In our study observers watched short video clips of a single tennis match and were asked to make subjective judgments about the allocation of visual attention to the items presented in the clip (e.g., ball, players, court lines, and umpire). However, before attending to the clips, observers were either told to simply watch clips (non-specific goal), or they were told to watch the clips with a view to judging which of the two tennis players was awarded the point (specific goal). The results of subjective reports suggest that observers believed that they allocated their attention more to goal-related items (e.g. court lines) if they performed the goal-specific task. However, we did not find the effect of goal specificity on major eye-movement parameters (i.e., saccadic amplitudes, inter-saccadic intervals, and gaze coherence). We conclude that the specificity of a task goal can alter observer's beliefs about their attention allocation strategy, but such task-driven meta-attentional modulation does not necessarily correlate with eye-movement behavior.",
author = "Shuichiro Taya and David Windridge and Magda Osman",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0039060",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Looking to score

T2 - The dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene

AU - Taya, Shuichiro

AU - Windridge, David

AU - Osman, Magda

PY - 2012/6/29

Y1 - 2012/6/29

N2 - Several studies have reported that task instructions influence eye-movement behavior during static image observation. In contrast, during dynamic scene observation we show that while the specificity of the goal of a task influences observers' beliefs about where they look, the goal does not in turn influence eye-movement patterns. In our study observers watched short video clips of a single tennis match and were asked to make subjective judgments about the allocation of visual attention to the items presented in the clip (e.g., ball, players, court lines, and umpire). However, before attending to the clips, observers were either told to simply watch clips (non-specific goal), or they were told to watch the clips with a view to judging which of the two tennis players was awarded the point (specific goal). The results of subjective reports suggest that observers believed that they allocated their attention more to goal-related items (e.g. court lines) if they performed the goal-specific task. However, we did not find the effect of goal specificity on major eye-movement parameters (i.e., saccadic amplitudes, inter-saccadic intervals, and gaze coherence). We conclude that the specificity of a task goal can alter observer's beliefs about their attention allocation strategy, but such task-driven meta-attentional modulation does not necessarily correlate with eye-movement behavior.

AB - Several studies have reported that task instructions influence eye-movement behavior during static image observation. In contrast, during dynamic scene observation we show that while the specificity of the goal of a task influences observers' beliefs about where they look, the goal does not in turn influence eye-movement patterns. In our study observers watched short video clips of a single tennis match and were asked to make subjective judgments about the allocation of visual attention to the items presented in the clip (e.g., ball, players, court lines, and umpire). However, before attending to the clips, observers were either told to simply watch clips (non-specific goal), or they were told to watch the clips with a view to judging which of the two tennis players was awarded the point (specific goal). The results of subjective reports suggest that observers believed that they allocated their attention more to goal-related items (e.g. court lines) if they performed the goal-specific task. However, we did not find the effect of goal specificity on major eye-movement parameters (i.e., saccadic amplitudes, inter-saccadic intervals, and gaze coherence). We conclude that the specificity of a task goal can alter observer's beliefs about their attention allocation strategy, but such task-driven meta-attentional modulation does not necessarily correlate with eye-movement behavior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863103698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863103698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0039060

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0039060

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 6

M1 - e39060

ER -