TY - JOUR
T1 - Low-Dose Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Elderly Japanese Patients with Atherosclerotic Risk Factors
T2 - Subanalysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial (JPPP-70)
AU - On behalf of the Japanese Primary Prevention Project (JPPP) Study Group
AU - Sugawara, Masahiro
AU - Goto, Yoshio
AU - Yamazaki, Tsutomu
AU - Teramoto, Tamio
AU - Oikawa, Shinichi
AU - Shimada, Kazuyuki
AU - Uchiyama, Shinichiro
AU - Ando, Katsuyuki
AU - Ishizuka, Naoki
AU - Murata, Mitsuru
AU - Yokoyama, Kenji
AU - Uemura, Yukari
AU - Ikeda, Yasuo
AU - Sugawara, Masahiro
AU - Yamada, Nobuhiro
AU - Fujita, Toshiro
AU - Hosoda, Saichi
AU - Origasa, Hideki
AU - Shinohara, Yukito
AU - Yamamoto, Akira
AU - Matsumoto, Masayasu
AU - Minematsu, Kazuo
AU - Daida, Hiroyuki
AU - Ogawa, Hisao
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflict of interest TY reports receiving personal fees from Astra-Zeneca, Dainippon Sumitomo, Shionogi, and Takeda. TT reports receiving grant support from Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Kowa, Shionogi, and Takeda; speaker fees from Amgen Astellas BioPharma, Astellas, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Kissei, Kowa, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda; and department endowments from Aska, Astellas, Bayer, Kissei, Kowa, and MSD. SO reports receiving personal fees from Astellas, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Mochida, MSD, and Takeda. SU reports receiving speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainihon Sumitomo, Otsuka, Shionogi, Takeda, and Tanabe Mitsubishi. KA reports receiving speaker fees from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Mochida, MSD, and Torii Pharmaceutical. NI reports being a former employee of Sanofi-Aventis. MM reports receiving grant support from Bayer, Daiichi Sanko, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, and Taisho-Toyama, and personal fees from Dainihon-Sumitomo, Otsuka, and Taisho-Toyama. KY reports grants from Nippon Shinyaku, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Takeda, Pfizer, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, and Eisai, and personal fees from Nippon Shinyaku, Celgene Japan, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Takeda, Pfizer, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, and Otsuka. YU reports receiving grants from the JPPP study secretariat. YI reports receiving fees for medical advice from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi-Aventis. MS, YG, and KS declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Information:
Additional contributions: We thank Takuro Shimbo, MD (Ohta Nishinouchi Hospital, Fukushima, Japan) for his advice throughout this study. Dr. Shimbo did not receive any compensation. Editorial assistance was provided by Lizzie Perdeaux, PhD, and Jesse Alderson, PhD (both from Oxford PharmaGenesis Ltd., Oxford, UK), with funding from the JPPP study office.
Funding Information:
Funding The JPPP was sponsored by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (Grant Number 200400519A) and the Waksman Foundation of Japan. The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Enteric-coated 100-mg aspirin tablets were provided free of charge by Bayer Yakuhin, Japan.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, The Author(s).
PY - 2019/6/1
Y1 - 2019/6/1
N2 - Introduction: This post hoc subanalysis of the randomized Japanese Primary Prevention Project investigated whether once-daily low-dose aspirin versus no aspirin reduced the risk of cardiovascular events (CVEs) in patients aged ≥ 70 years with atherosclerotic risk factors. Methods: Patients aged < 70 years (young-old) or ≥ 70 years (old) with hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes participated between 2005 and 2007. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 100 mg enteric-coated aspirin once daily or no aspirin plus standard of care. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes plus nonfatal stroke and nonfatal myocardial infarction. The secondary outcome was a composite of the primary outcome plus transient ischemic attack, angina pectoris, and arteriosclerotic disease requiring medical or surgical intervention. Old (n = 7971) and young-old (n = 6493) patients were followed up for a median 5.02 years. Results: Aspirin did not reduce the risk of primary (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.74–1.16]; P = 0.50) or secondary (0.85 [0.70–1.04]; P = 0.11) outcomes in patients aged ≥ 70 years. In old men with high-density lipoprotein < 40 mg/dL, treatment with low-dose aspirin was associated with a reduction in the incidence of the primary endpoint compared with the group not receiving aspirin (10/260 vs 22/250; HR 0.44 [95% CI 0.20–0.93]; P = 0.03). This subgroup was also found to contain significant larger proportions of patients with elevated body mass index, patients with diabetes mellitus, and smokers (P < 0.001). Old patients also showed differences in bleeding outcomes. Serious extracranial hemorrhage requiring transfusion or hospitalization occurred significantly more frequently in the aspirin-treated group than in the non–aspirin-treated group (35 [0.88%] vs 18 [0.45%]; HR 1.96 [1.11–3.46]; P = 0.020). Gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred significantly more frequently in the aspirin-treated group than the non–aspirin-treated group (63 [1.58%] vs 18 [0.45%]; relative risk [RR] 3.5 [2.08–5.90]; P < 0.0001). Cerebral hemorrhage (intracranial hemorrhage) tended to occur more frequently in the aspirin-treated group than the non–aspirin-treated group (22 [0.55%] vs 11 [0.28%]; RR 2.01 [0.97–4.14]; P = 0.058). Cerebral hemorrhage occurred significantly more frequently in old patients than in young-old patients (33 [0.41%] vs 10 [0.15%]; HR 2.7 [1.34–5.53]; P = 0.0055). Gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred in a slightly higher proportion of old patients compared with young-old patients (81 [1.02%] vs 53 [0.82%]; RR 1.2 [0.88–1.76]; P = 0.21). Discussion/Conclusions: Aspirin did not reduce the risk of the primary or secondary outcomes in old patients. Aspirin treatment may have reduced CVEs within a high CVE risk elderly population subgroup. Aspirin treatment in such a group requires caution, because of the increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage, severe extracranial hemorrhage requiring hospitalization or transfusion, and gastrointestinal bleeding in old patients receiving aspirin therapy. Clinical Trial Registration: The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00225849].
AB - Introduction: This post hoc subanalysis of the randomized Japanese Primary Prevention Project investigated whether once-daily low-dose aspirin versus no aspirin reduced the risk of cardiovascular events (CVEs) in patients aged ≥ 70 years with atherosclerotic risk factors. Methods: Patients aged < 70 years (young-old) or ≥ 70 years (old) with hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes participated between 2005 and 2007. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 100 mg enteric-coated aspirin once daily or no aspirin plus standard of care. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes plus nonfatal stroke and nonfatal myocardial infarction. The secondary outcome was a composite of the primary outcome plus transient ischemic attack, angina pectoris, and arteriosclerotic disease requiring medical or surgical intervention. Old (n = 7971) and young-old (n = 6493) patients were followed up for a median 5.02 years. Results: Aspirin did not reduce the risk of primary (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.74–1.16]; P = 0.50) or secondary (0.85 [0.70–1.04]; P = 0.11) outcomes in patients aged ≥ 70 years. In old men with high-density lipoprotein < 40 mg/dL, treatment with low-dose aspirin was associated with a reduction in the incidence of the primary endpoint compared with the group not receiving aspirin (10/260 vs 22/250; HR 0.44 [95% CI 0.20–0.93]; P = 0.03). This subgroup was also found to contain significant larger proportions of patients with elevated body mass index, patients with diabetes mellitus, and smokers (P < 0.001). Old patients also showed differences in bleeding outcomes. Serious extracranial hemorrhage requiring transfusion or hospitalization occurred significantly more frequently in the aspirin-treated group than in the non–aspirin-treated group (35 [0.88%] vs 18 [0.45%]; HR 1.96 [1.11–3.46]; P = 0.020). Gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred significantly more frequently in the aspirin-treated group than the non–aspirin-treated group (63 [1.58%] vs 18 [0.45%]; relative risk [RR] 3.5 [2.08–5.90]; P < 0.0001). Cerebral hemorrhage (intracranial hemorrhage) tended to occur more frequently in the aspirin-treated group than the non–aspirin-treated group (22 [0.55%] vs 11 [0.28%]; RR 2.01 [0.97–4.14]; P = 0.058). Cerebral hemorrhage occurred significantly more frequently in old patients than in young-old patients (33 [0.41%] vs 10 [0.15%]; HR 2.7 [1.34–5.53]; P = 0.0055). Gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred in a slightly higher proportion of old patients compared with young-old patients (81 [1.02%] vs 53 [0.82%]; RR 1.2 [0.88–1.76]; P = 0.21). Discussion/Conclusions: Aspirin did not reduce the risk of the primary or secondary outcomes in old patients. Aspirin treatment may have reduced CVEs within a high CVE risk elderly population subgroup. Aspirin treatment in such a group requires caution, because of the increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage, severe extracranial hemorrhage requiring hospitalization or transfusion, and gastrointestinal bleeding in old patients receiving aspirin therapy. Clinical Trial Registration: The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00225849].
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058942804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058942804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40256-018-0313-0
DO - 10.1007/s40256-018-0313-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 30565155
AN - SCOPUS:85058942804
SN - 1175-3277
VL - 19
SP - 299
EP - 311
JO - American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs
JF - American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs
IS - 3
ER -