MANEMO routing in practice

Protocol selection, expected performance, and experimental evaluation

Hajime Tazaki, Rodney D Van Meter, Ryuji Wakikawa, Thirapon Wongsaardsakul, Kanchana Kanchanasut, Marcelo Dias De Amorim, Jun Murai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Motivated by the deployment of post-disaster MANEMO (MANET for NEMO) composed of mobile routers and stations, we evaluate two candidate routing protocols through network simulation, theoretical performance analysis, and field experiments. The first protocol is the widely adopted Optimized Link State Routing protocol (OLSR) and the second is the combination of the Tree Discovery Protocol (TDP) with Network In Node Advertisement (NINA). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that these two protocols are compared in both theoretical and practical terms. We focus on the control overhead generated when mobile routers perform a handover. Our results confirm the correctness and operational robustness of both protocols. More interestingly, although in the general case OLSR leads to better results, TDP/NINA outperforms OLSR both in the case of sparse networks and in highly mobile networks, which correspond to the operation point of a large set of post-disaster scenarios.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2004-2011
Number of pages8
JournalIEICE Transactions on Communications
VolumeE93-B
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Aug

Fingerprint

Routing protocols
Network protocols
Routers
Disasters
Wireless networks
Experiments

Keywords

  • Field experiments
  • MANEMO
  • Routing
  • Simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Software

Cite this

MANEMO routing in practice : Protocol selection, expected performance, and experimental evaluation. / Tazaki, Hajime; Van Meter, Rodney D; Wakikawa, Ryuji; Wongsaardsakul, Thirapon; Kanchanasut, Kanchana; De Amorim, Marcelo Dias; Murai, Jun.

In: IEICE Transactions on Communications, Vol. E93-B, No. 8, 08.2010, p. 2004-2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tazaki, Hajime ; Van Meter, Rodney D ; Wakikawa, Ryuji ; Wongsaardsakul, Thirapon ; Kanchanasut, Kanchana ; De Amorim, Marcelo Dias ; Murai, Jun. / MANEMO routing in practice : Protocol selection, expected performance, and experimental evaluation. In: IEICE Transactions on Communications. 2010 ; Vol. E93-B, No. 8. pp. 2004-2011.
@article{af7aa13cf848445e81f765e47425b044,
title = "MANEMO routing in practice: Protocol selection, expected performance, and experimental evaluation",
abstract = "Motivated by the deployment of post-disaster MANEMO (MANET for NEMO) composed of mobile routers and stations, we evaluate two candidate routing protocols through network simulation, theoretical performance analysis, and field experiments. The first protocol is the widely adopted Optimized Link State Routing protocol (OLSR) and the second is the combination of the Tree Discovery Protocol (TDP) with Network In Node Advertisement (NINA). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that these two protocols are compared in both theoretical and practical terms. We focus on the control overhead generated when mobile routers perform a handover. Our results confirm the correctness and operational robustness of both protocols. More interestingly, although in the general case OLSR leads to better results, TDP/NINA outperforms OLSR both in the case of sparse networks and in highly mobile networks, which correspond to the operation point of a large set of post-disaster scenarios.",
keywords = "Field experiments, MANEMO, Routing, Simulation",
author = "Hajime Tazaki and {Van Meter}, {Rodney D} and Ryuji Wakikawa and Thirapon Wongsaardsakul and Kanchana Kanchanasut and {De Amorim}, {Marcelo Dias} and Jun Murai",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1587/transcom.E93.B.2004",
language = "English",
volume = "E93-B",
pages = "2004--2011",
journal = "IEICE Transactions on Communications",
issn = "0916-8516",
publisher = "Maruzen Co., Ltd/Maruzen Kabushikikaisha",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MANEMO routing in practice

T2 - Protocol selection, expected performance, and experimental evaluation

AU - Tazaki, Hajime

AU - Van Meter, Rodney D

AU - Wakikawa, Ryuji

AU - Wongsaardsakul, Thirapon

AU - Kanchanasut, Kanchana

AU - De Amorim, Marcelo Dias

AU - Murai, Jun

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - Motivated by the deployment of post-disaster MANEMO (MANET for NEMO) composed of mobile routers and stations, we evaluate two candidate routing protocols through network simulation, theoretical performance analysis, and field experiments. The first protocol is the widely adopted Optimized Link State Routing protocol (OLSR) and the second is the combination of the Tree Discovery Protocol (TDP) with Network In Node Advertisement (NINA). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that these two protocols are compared in both theoretical and practical terms. We focus on the control overhead generated when mobile routers perform a handover. Our results confirm the correctness and operational robustness of both protocols. More interestingly, although in the general case OLSR leads to better results, TDP/NINA outperforms OLSR both in the case of sparse networks and in highly mobile networks, which correspond to the operation point of a large set of post-disaster scenarios.

AB - Motivated by the deployment of post-disaster MANEMO (MANET for NEMO) composed of mobile routers and stations, we evaluate two candidate routing protocols through network simulation, theoretical performance analysis, and field experiments. The first protocol is the widely adopted Optimized Link State Routing protocol (OLSR) and the second is the combination of the Tree Discovery Protocol (TDP) with Network In Node Advertisement (NINA). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that these two protocols are compared in both theoretical and practical terms. We focus on the control overhead generated when mobile routers perform a handover. Our results confirm the correctness and operational robustness of both protocols. More interestingly, although in the general case OLSR leads to better results, TDP/NINA outperforms OLSR both in the case of sparse networks and in highly mobile networks, which correspond to the operation point of a large set of post-disaster scenarios.

KW - Field experiments

KW - MANEMO

KW - Routing

KW - Simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955396985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955396985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1587/transcom.E93.B.2004

DO - 10.1587/transcom.E93.B.2004

M3 - Article

VL - E93-B

SP - 2004

EP - 2011

JO - IEICE Transactions on Communications

JF - IEICE Transactions on Communications

SN - 0916-8516

IS - 8

ER -