Maternal nutrient restriction inhibits ureteric bud branching but does not affect the duration of nephrogenesis in rats

Midori Awazu, Mariko Hida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background:Maternal nutrient restriction produces offspring with fewer nephrons. We studied whether the reduced nephron number is due to the inhibition of ureteric branching or early cessation of nephrogenesis in rats. Signaling pathways involved in kidney development were also examined.Methods:The offspring of dams given food ad libitum (control (CON)) and those subjected to 50% food restriction (nutrient restriceted (NR)) were examined.Results:At embryonic day 13 (E13), there was no difference between NR and CON in body weight or kidney size. Ureteric buds branched once in both NR and CON. At E14 and E15, body and kidney size were significantly reduced in NR. Ureteric bud tip numbers were also reduced to 50% of CON. On the other hand, the disappearance of nephrogenic zone and a nephron progenitor marker Cited1 was not different between CON and NR. The final glomerular number of NR was 80% of CON. Activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), p38, PI3K, Akt, and mammallian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and protein expression of β-catenin were downregulated at E15.Conclusion:Ureteric branching is inhibited and developmentally regulated signaling pathways are downregulated at an early stage by maternal nutrient restriction. These changes, not early cessation of nephrogenesis, may be a mechanism for the inhibited kidney growth and nephrogenesis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)633-639
Number of pages7
JournalPediatric Research
Volume77
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 May 22

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Maternal nutrient restriction inhibits ureteric bud branching but does not affect the duration of nephrogenesis in rats'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this