Maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction for hemifacial microsomia

Hideo Nakajima, Yoshiaki Sakamoto, Ikkei Tamada, Hisao Ogata, Kazuo Kishi, Teruo Sakamoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We treat hemifacial microsomia with a combination of surgery and orthodontic treatment during the growth period, resulting in early improvement in facial asymmetry and the induction of normal growth. We previously used gradual distraction of the mandibular ramus for Pruzansky's type II classification (Pruzansky, 1969). In type II cases, the maxilla should also be treated actively as, using this technique, improvement of the occlusal plane is difficult to achieve, resulting in a cross bite and difficulties in post-operative orthodontic treatment - especially in older patients. Morphologically, the mandibular angle region of the operative side is flat, and the angle of the mouth remains elevated. We performed mandibular-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction while the occlusion was maintained using intermaxillary anchorage. However, mandibular-driven distraction tended to elongate the face because the mandible only elongated downwards and the mandibular ramus did not reach the glenoid. Furthermore, external distraction devices produce significant distress for patients until removal of the device and cause scars on the face. We developed a new internal distraction device with a variable angle and performed maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction using this device. The result was morphologically satisfactory and solved the above problems. Because the patient was in the growth period, careful follow-up and induction to normal growth were important while the inferior growth of the affected side was monitored.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)549-553
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Dec

Fingerprint

Goldenhar Syndrome
Growth
Orthodontics
Equipment and Supplies
Facial Asymmetry
Device Removal
Dental Occlusion
Malocclusion
Maxilla
Mandible
Cicatrix
Mouth
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Distraction osteogenesis
  • Hemifacial microsomia
  • Internal distraction device
  • Simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction for hemifacial microsomia. / Nakajima, Hideo; Sakamoto, Yoshiaki; Tamada, Ikkei; Ogata, Hisao; Kishi, Kazuo; Sakamoto, Teruo.

In: Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 39, No. 8, 12.2011, p. 549-553.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nakajima, Hideo ; Sakamoto, Yoshiaki ; Tamada, Ikkei ; Ogata, Hisao ; Kishi, Kazuo ; Sakamoto, Teruo. / Maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction for hemifacial microsomia. In: Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 39, No. 8. pp. 549-553.
@article{62cf53aee5084fa19c49b6f7bbd67ac6,
title = "Maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction for hemifacial microsomia",
abstract = "We treat hemifacial microsomia with a combination of surgery and orthodontic treatment during the growth period, resulting in early improvement in facial asymmetry and the induction of normal growth. We previously used gradual distraction of the mandibular ramus for Pruzansky's type II classification (Pruzansky, 1969). In type II cases, the maxilla should also be treated actively as, using this technique, improvement of the occlusal plane is difficult to achieve, resulting in a cross bite and difficulties in post-operative orthodontic treatment - especially in older patients. Morphologically, the mandibular angle region of the operative side is flat, and the angle of the mouth remains elevated. We performed mandibular-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction while the occlusion was maintained using intermaxillary anchorage. However, mandibular-driven distraction tended to elongate the face because the mandible only elongated downwards and the mandibular ramus did not reach the glenoid. Furthermore, external distraction devices produce significant distress for patients until removal of the device and cause scars on the face. We developed a new internal distraction device with a variable angle and performed maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction using this device. The result was morphologically satisfactory and solved the above problems. Because the patient was in the growth period, careful follow-up and induction to normal growth were important while the inferior growth of the affected side was monitored.",
keywords = "Distraction osteogenesis, Hemifacial microsomia, Internal distraction device, Simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction",
author = "Hideo Nakajima and Yoshiaki Sakamoto and Ikkei Tamada and Hisao Ogata and Kazuo Kishi and Teruo Sakamoto",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcms.2010.11.017",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "549--553",
journal = "Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery",
issn = "1010-5182",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction for hemifacial microsomia

AU - Nakajima, Hideo

AU - Sakamoto, Yoshiaki

AU - Tamada, Ikkei

AU - Ogata, Hisao

AU - Kishi, Kazuo

AU - Sakamoto, Teruo

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - We treat hemifacial microsomia with a combination of surgery and orthodontic treatment during the growth period, resulting in early improvement in facial asymmetry and the induction of normal growth. We previously used gradual distraction of the mandibular ramus for Pruzansky's type II classification (Pruzansky, 1969). In type II cases, the maxilla should also be treated actively as, using this technique, improvement of the occlusal plane is difficult to achieve, resulting in a cross bite and difficulties in post-operative orthodontic treatment - especially in older patients. Morphologically, the mandibular angle region of the operative side is flat, and the angle of the mouth remains elevated. We performed mandibular-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction while the occlusion was maintained using intermaxillary anchorage. However, mandibular-driven distraction tended to elongate the face because the mandible only elongated downwards and the mandibular ramus did not reach the glenoid. Furthermore, external distraction devices produce significant distress for patients until removal of the device and cause scars on the face. We developed a new internal distraction device with a variable angle and performed maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction using this device. The result was morphologically satisfactory and solved the above problems. Because the patient was in the growth period, careful follow-up and induction to normal growth were important while the inferior growth of the affected side was monitored.

AB - We treat hemifacial microsomia with a combination of surgery and orthodontic treatment during the growth period, resulting in early improvement in facial asymmetry and the induction of normal growth. We previously used gradual distraction of the mandibular ramus for Pruzansky's type II classification (Pruzansky, 1969). In type II cases, the maxilla should also be treated actively as, using this technique, improvement of the occlusal plane is difficult to achieve, resulting in a cross bite and difficulties in post-operative orthodontic treatment - especially in older patients. Morphologically, the mandibular angle region of the operative side is flat, and the angle of the mouth remains elevated. We performed mandibular-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction while the occlusion was maintained using intermaxillary anchorage. However, mandibular-driven distraction tended to elongate the face because the mandible only elongated downwards and the mandibular ramus did not reach the glenoid. Furthermore, external distraction devices produce significant distress for patients until removal of the device and cause scars on the face. We developed a new internal distraction device with a variable angle and performed maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction using this device. The result was morphologically satisfactory and solved the above problems. Because the patient was in the growth period, careful follow-up and induction to normal growth were important while the inferior growth of the affected side was monitored.

KW - Distraction osteogenesis

KW - Hemifacial microsomia

KW - Internal distraction device

KW - Simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80055052215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80055052215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.11.017

DO - 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.11.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 21195627

AN - SCOPUS:80055052215

VL - 39

SP - 549

EP - 553

JO - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

SN - 1010-5182

IS - 8

ER -