Measuring work factors: A case study to identify relationships among work activities, styles and an environment

Motohiro Sakamaki, Fumihito Ikeda, Shingo Takada, Kumiyo Nakakoji

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

A work environment needs to be designed based on the nature and characteristics of the work activities and the work styles. Unless we have a clear understanding of what factors of work activities and styles depend on what factors of work environments and vice versa, we would not be able to modify or add components of work environments “effectively.” This paper first presents our framework to measure work factors of work activities, styles and an environment, and then discusses results of our case study of applying the framework to actual work practice at NTT Data Corporation. Our framework consists of three representational models: The KPM (Knowledge Production Model) for representing work activities, the MS-GI (Mobile-Settled, Group-Individual) model for characterizing work styles, and the SOU (System-Office-Usage) model for representing a work environment. We have conducted a survey on 274 workers at an organizational unit of NTT Data Corporation by applying the three models. The result shows that the framework is successfully applied to understand the relationships among the three work factors at least partially if not completely. The paper concludes with a discussion of how the framework can be used to evolve work environments by taking into account work activities and styles.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages164-176
Number of pages13
Volume1670
ISBN (Print)354066596X, 9783540665960
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999
Event2nd International Workshop on Cooperative Buildings, CoBuild 1999 - Pittsburgh, United States
Duration: 1999 Oct 11999 Oct 2

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume1670
ISSN (Print)03029743
ISSN (Electronic)16113349

Other

Other2nd International Workshop on Cooperative Buildings, CoBuild 1999
CountryUnited States
CityPittsburgh
Period99/10/199/10/2

Fingerprint

Model
Industry
Style
Relationships
Framework
Unit
Knowledge

Keywords

  • Case studies
  • Measurement
  • Office design
  • Work environments
  • Work styles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Theoretical Computer Science

Cite this

Sakamaki, M., Ikeda, F., Takada, S., & Nakakoji, K. (1999). Measuring work factors: A case study to identify relationships among work activities, styles and an environment. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 1670, pp. 164-176). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 1670). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/10705432_15

Measuring work factors : A case study to identify relationships among work activities, styles and an environment. / Sakamaki, Motohiro; Ikeda, Fumihito; Takada, Shingo; Nakakoji, Kumiyo.

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Vol. 1670 Springer Verlag, 1999. p. 164-176 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 1670).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Sakamaki, M, Ikeda, F, Takada, S & Nakakoji, K 1999, Measuring work factors: A case study to identify relationships among work activities, styles and an environment. in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). vol. 1670, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 1670, Springer Verlag, pp. 164-176, 2nd International Workshop on Cooperative Buildings, CoBuild 1999, Pittsburgh, United States, 99/10/1. https://doi.org/10.1007/10705432_15
Sakamaki M, Ikeda F, Takada S, Nakakoji K. Measuring work factors: A case study to identify relationships among work activities, styles and an environment. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Vol. 1670. Springer Verlag. 1999. p. 164-176. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)). https://doi.org/10.1007/10705432_15
Sakamaki, Motohiro ; Ikeda, Fumihito ; Takada, Shingo ; Nakakoji, Kumiyo. / Measuring work factors : A case study to identify relationships among work activities, styles and an environment. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Vol. 1670 Springer Verlag, 1999. pp. 164-176 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)).
@inproceedings{a91b5ce7a43440348336a50fa07552b7,
title = "Measuring work factors: A case study to identify relationships among work activities, styles and an environment",
abstract = "A work environment needs to be designed based on the nature and characteristics of the work activities and the work styles. Unless we have a clear understanding of what factors of work activities and styles depend on what factors of work environments and vice versa, we would not be able to modify or add components of work environments “effectively.” This paper first presents our framework to measure work factors of work activities, styles and an environment, and then discusses results of our case study of applying the framework to actual work practice at NTT Data Corporation. Our framework consists of three representational models: The KPM (Knowledge Production Model) for representing work activities, the MS-GI (Mobile-Settled, Group-Individual) model for characterizing work styles, and the SOU (System-Office-Usage) model for representing a work environment. We have conducted a survey on 274 workers at an organizational unit of NTT Data Corporation by applying the three models. The result shows that the framework is successfully applied to understand the relationships among the three work factors at least partially if not completely. The paper concludes with a discussion of how the framework can be used to evolve work environments by taking into account work activities and styles.",
keywords = "Case studies, Measurement, Office design, Work environments, Work styles",
author = "Motohiro Sakamaki and Fumihito Ikeda and Shingo Takada and Kumiyo Nakakoji",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1007/10705432_15",
language = "English",
isbn = "354066596X",
volume = "1670",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
pages = "164--176",
booktitle = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Measuring work factors

T2 - A case study to identify relationships among work activities, styles and an environment

AU - Sakamaki, Motohiro

AU - Ikeda, Fumihito

AU - Takada, Shingo

AU - Nakakoji, Kumiyo

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - A work environment needs to be designed based on the nature and characteristics of the work activities and the work styles. Unless we have a clear understanding of what factors of work activities and styles depend on what factors of work environments and vice versa, we would not be able to modify or add components of work environments “effectively.” This paper first presents our framework to measure work factors of work activities, styles and an environment, and then discusses results of our case study of applying the framework to actual work practice at NTT Data Corporation. Our framework consists of three representational models: The KPM (Knowledge Production Model) for representing work activities, the MS-GI (Mobile-Settled, Group-Individual) model for characterizing work styles, and the SOU (System-Office-Usage) model for representing a work environment. We have conducted a survey on 274 workers at an organizational unit of NTT Data Corporation by applying the three models. The result shows that the framework is successfully applied to understand the relationships among the three work factors at least partially if not completely. The paper concludes with a discussion of how the framework can be used to evolve work environments by taking into account work activities and styles.

AB - A work environment needs to be designed based on the nature and characteristics of the work activities and the work styles. Unless we have a clear understanding of what factors of work activities and styles depend on what factors of work environments and vice versa, we would not be able to modify or add components of work environments “effectively.” This paper first presents our framework to measure work factors of work activities, styles and an environment, and then discusses results of our case study of applying the framework to actual work practice at NTT Data Corporation. Our framework consists of three representational models: The KPM (Knowledge Production Model) for representing work activities, the MS-GI (Mobile-Settled, Group-Individual) model for characterizing work styles, and the SOU (System-Office-Usage) model for representing a work environment. We have conducted a survey on 274 workers at an organizational unit of NTT Data Corporation by applying the three models. The result shows that the framework is successfully applied to understand the relationships among the three work factors at least partially if not completely. The paper concludes with a discussion of how the framework can be used to evolve work environments by taking into account work activities and styles.

KW - Case studies

KW - Measurement

KW - Office design

KW - Work environments

KW - Work styles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957631071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957631071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/10705432_15

DO - 10.1007/10705432_15

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84957631071

SN - 354066596X

SN - 9783540665960

VL - 1670

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

SP - 164

EP - 176

BT - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

PB - Springer Verlag

ER -