Mechanical-stapled versus hand-sutured anastomoses in Billroth-I reconstruction with distal gastrectomy

Tsunehiro Takahashi, Yoshiro Saikawa, Masashi Yoshida, Yoshihide Otani, Tetsuro Kubota, Koichiro Kumai, Masaki Kitajima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. In June 2000, we started performing mechanical-stapled anastomosis (MSA) for Billroth-I reconstruction (B-I) in distal gastrectomy. Thus, we performed a retrospective study to compare the clinical outcome of MSA and conventional hand-sutured anastomosis (HA). Methods. We evaluated 103 patients who underwent a B-I reconstruction. The data we collected included operative time, operative blood loss, time until oral intake, postoperative hospital stay, and anastomotic and general complications. We also examined the remnant stomach by endoscopy and classified it according to the Residue, Gastritis, Bile (RGB) criteria. Results. The operative time was significantly shorter with MSA than with HA, but there were no other significant differences between the two groups. The RGB classification showed that there was more residual stomach content after MSA than after HA. The incidence of gastritis and bile reflux was not significantly different between the two procedures. Conclusion. The operative time for B-I reconstruction with distal gastrectomy was significantly shorter with MSA than with HA. While there were no significant disadvantages in the incidence of complications associated with MSA compared with HA, MSA resulted in more residue in the remnant stomach. The findings of this study showed the advantages and disadvantages of MSA, and suggest that MSA and HA are equivalent as anastomotic procedures in B-I reconstruction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)122-126
Number of pages5
JournalSurgery Today
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 Feb

Fingerprint

Gastroenterostomy
Gastrectomy
Hand
Gastric Stump
Gastritis
Operative Time
Bile
Bile Reflux
Gastrointestinal Contents
Incidence
Endoscopy
Length of Stay
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Billroth-I reconstruction
  • Distal gastrectomy
  • Hand-sutured anastomosis
  • Mechanical anastomosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Takahashi, T., Saikawa, Y., Yoshida, M., Otani, Y., Kubota, T., Kumai, K., & Kitajima, M. (2007). Mechanical-stapled versus hand-sutured anastomoses in Billroth-I reconstruction with distal gastrectomy. Surgery Today, 37(2), 122-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-006-3361-z

Mechanical-stapled versus hand-sutured anastomoses in Billroth-I reconstruction with distal gastrectomy. / Takahashi, Tsunehiro; Saikawa, Yoshiro; Yoshida, Masashi; Otani, Yoshihide; Kubota, Tetsuro; Kumai, Koichiro; Kitajima, Masaki.

In: Surgery Today, Vol. 37, No. 2, 02.2007, p. 122-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Takahashi, T, Saikawa, Y, Yoshida, M, Otani, Y, Kubota, T, Kumai, K & Kitajima, M 2007, 'Mechanical-stapled versus hand-sutured anastomoses in Billroth-I reconstruction with distal gastrectomy', Surgery Today, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 122-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-006-3361-z
Takahashi, Tsunehiro ; Saikawa, Yoshiro ; Yoshida, Masashi ; Otani, Yoshihide ; Kubota, Tetsuro ; Kumai, Koichiro ; Kitajima, Masaki. / Mechanical-stapled versus hand-sutured anastomoses in Billroth-I reconstruction with distal gastrectomy. In: Surgery Today. 2007 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 122-126.
@article{9e067912e3a14ed0b6cea6d16fa4eee8,
title = "Mechanical-stapled versus hand-sutured anastomoses in Billroth-I reconstruction with distal gastrectomy",
abstract = "Purpose. In June 2000, we started performing mechanical-stapled anastomosis (MSA) for Billroth-I reconstruction (B-I) in distal gastrectomy. Thus, we performed a retrospective study to compare the clinical outcome of MSA and conventional hand-sutured anastomosis (HA). Methods. We evaluated 103 patients who underwent a B-I reconstruction. The data we collected included operative time, operative blood loss, time until oral intake, postoperative hospital stay, and anastomotic and general complications. We also examined the remnant stomach by endoscopy and classified it according to the Residue, Gastritis, Bile (RGB) criteria. Results. The operative time was significantly shorter with MSA than with HA, but there were no other significant differences between the two groups. The RGB classification showed that there was more residual stomach content after MSA than after HA. The incidence of gastritis and bile reflux was not significantly different between the two procedures. Conclusion. The operative time for B-I reconstruction with distal gastrectomy was significantly shorter with MSA than with HA. While there were no significant disadvantages in the incidence of complications associated with MSA compared with HA, MSA resulted in more residue in the remnant stomach. The findings of this study showed the advantages and disadvantages of MSA, and suggest that MSA and HA are equivalent as anastomotic procedures in B-I reconstruction.",
keywords = "Billroth-I reconstruction, Distal gastrectomy, Hand-sutured anastomosis, Mechanical anastomosis",
author = "Tsunehiro Takahashi and Yoshiro Saikawa and Masashi Yoshida and Yoshihide Otani and Tetsuro Kubota and Koichiro Kumai and Masaki Kitajima",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s00595-006-3361-z",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "122--126",
journal = "Surgery Today",
issn = "0941-1291",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanical-stapled versus hand-sutured anastomoses in Billroth-I reconstruction with distal gastrectomy

AU - Takahashi, Tsunehiro

AU - Saikawa, Yoshiro

AU - Yoshida, Masashi

AU - Otani, Yoshihide

AU - Kubota, Tetsuro

AU - Kumai, Koichiro

AU - Kitajima, Masaki

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - Purpose. In June 2000, we started performing mechanical-stapled anastomosis (MSA) for Billroth-I reconstruction (B-I) in distal gastrectomy. Thus, we performed a retrospective study to compare the clinical outcome of MSA and conventional hand-sutured anastomosis (HA). Methods. We evaluated 103 patients who underwent a B-I reconstruction. The data we collected included operative time, operative blood loss, time until oral intake, postoperative hospital stay, and anastomotic and general complications. We also examined the remnant stomach by endoscopy and classified it according to the Residue, Gastritis, Bile (RGB) criteria. Results. The operative time was significantly shorter with MSA than with HA, but there were no other significant differences between the two groups. The RGB classification showed that there was more residual stomach content after MSA than after HA. The incidence of gastritis and bile reflux was not significantly different between the two procedures. Conclusion. The operative time for B-I reconstruction with distal gastrectomy was significantly shorter with MSA than with HA. While there were no significant disadvantages in the incidence of complications associated with MSA compared with HA, MSA resulted in more residue in the remnant stomach. The findings of this study showed the advantages and disadvantages of MSA, and suggest that MSA and HA are equivalent as anastomotic procedures in B-I reconstruction.

AB - Purpose. In June 2000, we started performing mechanical-stapled anastomosis (MSA) for Billroth-I reconstruction (B-I) in distal gastrectomy. Thus, we performed a retrospective study to compare the clinical outcome of MSA and conventional hand-sutured anastomosis (HA). Methods. We evaluated 103 patients who underwent a B-I reconstruction. The data we collected included operative time, operative blood loss, time until oral intake, postoperative hospital stay, and anastomotic and general complications. We also examined the remnant stomach by endoscopy and classified it according to the Residue, Gastritis, Bile (RGB) criteria. Results. The operative time was significantly shorter with MSA than with HA, but there were no other significant differences between the two groups. The RGB classification showed that there was more residual stomach content after MSA than after HA. The incidence of gastritis and bile reflux was not significantly different between the two procedures. Conclusion. The operative time for B-I reconstruction with distal gastrectomy was significantly shorter with MSA than with HA. While there were no significant disadvantages in the incidence of complications associated with MSA compared with HA, MSA resulted in more residue in the remnant stomach. The findings of this study showed the advantages and disadvantages of MSA, and suggest that MSA and HA are equivalent as anastomotic procedures in B-I reconstruction.

KW - Billroth-I reconstruction

KW - Distal gastrectomy

KW - Hand-sutured anastomosis

KW - Mechanical anastomosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846542495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846542495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00595-006-3361-z

DO - 10.1007/s00595-006-3361-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 17243030

AN - SCOPUS:33846542495

VL - 37

SP - 122

EP - 126

JO - Surgery Today

JF - Surgery Today

SN - 0941-1291

IS - 2

ER -