TY - JOUR
T1 - Medical Costs and Readmissions After Intensive Poststroke Rehabilitation
T2 - Japanese Claims Data
AU - Nagayama, Hirofumi
AU - Tomori, Kounosuke
AU - Ikeda, Kohei
AU - Yamauchi, Keita
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant number: JP18K17324, JP20H03914) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.We are grateful to the occupational therapy students of the Nagayama laboratory (M. Sakai, H. Seki, K. Hira, A. Tsuji, C. Kudo) for helping with the analysis. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers: JP18K17324, JP20H03914.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant number: JP 18K17324 , JP 20H03914 ) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Objectives: This study examined the association between intensive rehabilitation for subacute stroke patients and medical costs and readmission ratio during the year after discharge. Design: This was a natural experiment study. Setting and Participants: We identified individuals with a diagnosis of cerebrovascular disorder (ICD-10: I60-I69 cerebrovascular disease) in an insurance claims database in Japan from January 2005 to December 2017. From the database, 980 patients who were admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation unit with stroke were identified. After excluding 575 patients, 405 were eligible for the study. Methods: In Japan, from April 2011, a new policy was established that allows special costs to be added as rehabilitation time increases. This policy provides an additional medical fee for inpatients in a convalescent rehabilitation unit who receive more than 120 minutes of rehabilitation therapy. We defined high-intensity rehabilitation as transfer from hospitalization to a convalescent rehabilitation unit after April 2011. Outcomes were total direct medical costs and readmission ratio during the year after discharge from the convalescent rehabilitation unit. Results: Daily rehabilitation time, total rehabilitation time, and total medical costs of the high-intensity rehabilitation group were significantly higher than those of the low-intensity rehabilitation group (P < .001, P < .001, P = .011, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in the medical costs during the year after discharge (P = .653) or in the readmission ratio (hazard ratio: 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 0.55-2.18, P = .804). Conclusions and Implications: Intensive rehabilitation did not reduce medical costs or the readmission ratio during the first year after discharge. Future studies should consider the necessary rehabilitation intensity given the severity of the patient's condition, using large sample sizes.
AB - Objectives: This study examined the association between intensive rehabilitation for subacute stroke patients and medical costs and readmission ratio during the year after discharge. Design: This was a natural experiment study. Setting and Participants: We identified individuals with a diagnosis of cerebrovascular disorder (ICD-10: I60-I69 cerebrovascular disease) in an insurance claims database in Japan from January 2005 to December 2017. From the database, 980 patients who were admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation unit with stroke were identified. After excluding 575 patients, 405 were eligible for the study. Methods: In Japan, from April 2011, a new policy was established that allows special costs to be added as rehabilitation time increases. This policy provides an additional medical fee for inpatients in a convalescent rehabilitation unit who receive more than 120 minutes of rehabilitation therapy. We defined high-intensity rehabilitation as transfer from hospitalization to a convalescent rehabilitation unit after April 2011. Outcomes were total direct medical costs and readmission ratio during the year after discharge from the convalescent rehabilitation unit. Results: Daily rehabilitation time, total rehabilitation time, and total medical costs of the high-intensity rehabilitation group were significantly higher than those of the low-intensity rehabilitation group (P < .001, P < .001, P = .011, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in the medical costs during the year after discharge (P = .653) or in the readmission ratio (hazard ratio: 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 0.55-2.18, P = .804). Conclusions and Implications: Intensive rehabilitation did not reduce medical costs or the readmission ratio during the first year after discharge. Future studies should consider the necessary rehabilitation intensity given the severity of the patient's condition, using large sample sizes.
KW - Intensive rehabilitation therapy
KW - medical cost
KW - risk of readmission
KW - stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100438496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100438496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.12.015
DO - 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.12.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 33476570
AN - SCOPUS:85100438496
SN - 1525-8610
VL - 22
SP - 1762-1766.e1
JO - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
JF - Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
IS - 8
ER -