Melancholic and reactive depression: A reappraisal of old categories

Jin Mizushima, Hitoshi Sakurai, Yuya Mizuno, Masaki Shinfuku, Hideaki Tani, Kazunari Yoshida, Chisa Ozawa, Asako Serizawa, Natsuko Kodashiro, Shinya Koide, Atsumi Minamisawa, Eisaku Mutsumoto, Nobuhiro Nagai, Sachiko Noda, Genichiro Tachino, Tatsuichiro Takahashi, Hiroyoshi Takeuchi, Toshiaki Kikuchi, Hiroyuki Uchida, Koichiro WatanabeHiroki Kocha, Masaru Mimura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The dominant diagnostic model of the classification of depression today is unitarian; however, since Kurt Schneider (1920) introduced the concept of endogenous depression and reactive depression, the binary model has still often been used on a clinical basis. Notwithstanding this, to our knowledge, there have been no collective data on how psychiatrists differentiate these two conditions. We therefore conducted a survey to examine how psychiatrists in Japan differentiate patients with major depressive disorder who present mainly with melancholic features and those with reactive features.Methods: Three case scenarios of melancholic and reactive depression, and one-in-between were prepared. These cases were designed to present with at least 5 symptoms listed in the DSM-IV-TR with severity being mild. We have sent the questionnaires regarding treatment options and diagnosis for those three cases on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = "not appropriate", 4 = "cannot tell", and 7 = "appropriate"). Five hundred and two psychiatrists from over one hundred hospitals and community clinics throughout Japan have participated in this survey.Results: The melancholic case resulted significantly higher than the reactive case on either antidepressants (mean ± SD: 5.9 ± 1.2 vs. 3.6 ± 1.7, p < 0.001), hypnotics (mean ± SD: 5.5 ± 1.1 vs. 5.0 ± 1.3, p < 0.001), and electroconvulsive therapy (mean ± SD: 1.5 ± 0.9 vs. 1.2 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). On the other hand, the reactive case resulted in significantly higher scores compared to the melancholic case and the one- in-between cases in regards to psychotherapy (mean ± SD: 4.9 ± 1.4 vs. 4.3 ± 1.4 vs. 4.7 ± 1.5, p < 0.001, respectively). Scores for informing patients that they suffered from "depression" were significantly higher in the melancholic case, compared to the reactive case (mean ± SD: 4.7 ± 1.7 vs. 2.2 ± 1.4, p < 0.001).Conclusions: Japanese psychiatrists distinguish between major depressive disorder with melancholic and reactive features, and thus choose different treatment strategies regarding pharmacological treatment and psychotherapy.

Original languageEnglish
Article number311
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Nov 16

Fingerprint

Adjustment Disorders
Psychiatry
Major Depressive Disorder
Psychotherapy
Japan
Depression
Electroconvulsive Therapy
Depressive Disorder
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Antidepressive Agents
Therapeutics
Pharmacology
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Antidepressant
  • Diagnosis
  • Melancholic depression
  • Newcastle scale
  • Reactive depression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Melancholic and reactive depression : A reappraisal of old categories. / Mizushima, Jin; Sakurai, Hitoshi; Mizuno, Yuya; Shinfuku, Masaki; Tani, Hideaki; Yoshida, Kazunari; Ozawa, Chisa; Serizawa, Asako; Kodashiro, Natsuko; Koide, Shinya; Minamisawa, Atsumi; Mutsumoto, Eisaku; Nagai, Nobuhiro; Noda, Sachiko; Tachino, Genichiro; Takahashi, Tatsuichiro; Takeuchi, Hiroyoshi; Kikuchi, Toshiaki; Uchida, Hiroyuki; Watanabe, Koichiro; Kocha, Hiroki; Mimura, Masaru.

In: BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 13, 311, 16.11.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mizushima, J, Sakurai, H, Mizuno, Y, Shinfuku, M, Tani, H, Yoshida, K, Ozawa, C, Serizawa, A, Kodashiro, N, Koide, S, Minamisawa, A, Mutsumoto, E, Nagai, N, Noda, S, Tachino, G, Takahashi, T, Takeuchi, H, Kikuchi, T, Uchida, H, Watanabe, K, Kocha, H & Mimura, M 2013, 'Melancholic and reactive depression: A reappraisal of old categories', BMC Psychiatry, vol. 13, 311. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-311
Mizushima, Jin ; Sakurai, Hitoshi ; Mizuno, Yuya ; Shinfuku, Masaki ; Tani, Hideaki ; Yoshida, Kazunari ; Ozawa, Chisa ; Serizawa, Asako ; Kodashiro, Natsuko ; Koide, Shinya ; Minamisawa, Atsumi ; Mutsumoto, Eisaku ; Nagai, Nobuhiro ; Noda, Sachiko ; Tachino, Genichiro ; Takahashi, Tatsuichiro ; Takeuchi, Hiroyoshi ; Kikuchi, Toshiaki ; Uchida, Hiroyuki ; Watanabe, Koichiro ; Kocha, Hiroki ; Mimura, Masaru. / Melancholic and reactive depression : A reappraisal of old categories. In: BMC Psychiatry. 2013 ; Vol. 13.
@article{8a405588b82648c7bfff5500ee5ce868,
title = "Melancholic and reactive depression: A reappraisal of old categories",
abstract = "Background: The dominant diagnostic model of the classification of depression today is unitarian; however, since Kurt Schneider (1920) introduced the concept of endogenous depression and reactive depression, the binary model has still often been used on a clinical basis. Notwithstanding this, to our knowledge, there have been no collective data on how psychiatrists differentiate these two conditions. We therefore conducted a survey to examine how psychiatrists in Japan differentiate patients with major depressive disorder who present mainly with melancholic features and those with reactive features.Methods: Three case scenarios of melancholic and reactive depression, and one-in-between were prepared. These cases were designed to present with at least 5 symptoms listed in the DSM-IV-TR with severity being mild. We have sent the questionnaires regarding treatment options and diagnosis for those three cases on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = {"}not appropriate{"}, 4 = {"}cannot tell{"}, and 7 = {"}appropriate{"}). Five hundred and two psychiatrists from over one hundred hospitals and community clinics throughout Japan have participated in this survey.Results: The melancholic case resulted significantly higher than the reactive case on either antidepressants (mean ± SD: 5.9 ± 1.2 vs. 3.6 ± 1.7, p < 0.001), hypnotics (mean ± SD: 5.5 ± 1.1 vs. 5.0 ± 1.3, p < 0.001), and electroconvulsive therapy (mean ± SD: 1.5 ± 0.9 vs. 1.2 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). On the other hand, the reactive case resulted in significantly higher scores compared to the melancholic case and the one- in-between cases in regards to psychotherapy (mean ± SD: 4.9 ± 1.4 vs. 4.3 ± 1.4 vs. 4.7 ± 1.5, p < 0.001, respectively). Scores for informing patients that they suffered from {"}depression{"} were significantly higher in the melancholic case, compared to the reactive case (mean ± SD: 4.7 ± 1.7 vs. 2.2 ± 1.4, p < 0.001).Conclusions: Japanese psychiatrists distinguish between major depressive disorder with melancholic and reactive features, and thus choose different treatment strategies regarding pharmacological treatment and psychotherapy.",
keywords = "Antidepressant, Diagnosis, Melancholic depression, Newcastle scale, Reactive depression",
author = "Jin Mizushima and Hitoshi Sakurai and Yuya Mizuno and Masaki Shinfuku and Hideaki Tani and Kazunari Yoshida and Chisa Ozawa and Asako Serizawa and Natsuko Kodashiro and Shinya Koide and Atsumi Minamisawa and Eisaku Mutsumoto and Nobuhiro Nagai and Sachiko Noda and Genichiro Tachino and Tatsuichiro Takahashi and Hiroyoshi Takeuchi and Toshiaki Kikuchi and Hiroyuki Uchida and Koichiro Watanabe and Hiroki Kocha and Masaru Mimura",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1186/1471-244X-13-311",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "BMC Psychiatry",
issn = "1471-244X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Melancholic and reactive depression

T2 - A reappraisal of old categories

AU - Mizushima, Jin

AU - Sakurai, Hitoshi

AU - Mizuno, Yuya

AU - Shinfuku, Masaki

AU - Tani, Hideaki

AU - Yoshida, Kazunari

AU - Ozawa, Chisa

AU - Serizawa, Asako

AU - Kodashiro, Natsuko

AU - Koide, Shinya

AU - Minamisawa, Atsumi

AU - Mutsumoto, Eisaku

AU - Nagai, Nobuhiro

AU - Noda, Sachiko

AU - Tachino, Genichiro

AU - Takahashi, Tatsuichiro

AU - Takeuchi, Hiroyoshi

AU - Kikuchi, Toshiaki

AU - Uchida, Hiroyuki

AU - Watanabe, Koichiro

AU - Kocha, Hiroki

AU - Mimura, Masaru

PY - 2013/11/16

Y1 - 2013/11/16

N2 - Background: The dominant diagnostic model of the classification of depression today is unitarian; however, since Kurt Schneider (1920) introduced the concept of endogenous depression and reactive depression, the binary model has still often been used on a clinical basis. Notwithstanding this, to our knowledge, there have been no collective data on how psychiatrists differentiate these two conditions. We therefore conducted a survey to examine how psychiatrists in Japan differentiate patients with major depressive disorder who present mainly with melancholic features and those with reactive features.Methods: Three case scenarios of melancholic and reactive depression, and one-in-between were prepared. These cases were designed to present with at least 5 symptoms listed in the DSM-IV-TR with severity being mild. We have sent the questionnaires regarding treatment options and diagnosis for those three cases on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = "not appropriate", 4 = "cannot tell", and 7 = "appropriate"). Five hundred and two psychiatrists from over one hundred hospitals and community clinics throughout Japan have participated in this survey.Results: The melancholic case resulted significantly higher than the reactive case on either antidepressants (mean ± SD: 5.9 ± 1.2 vs. 3.6 ± 1.7, p < 0.001), hypnotics (mean ± SD: 5.5 ± 1.1 vs. 5.0 ± 1.3, p < 0.001), and electroconvulsive therapy (mean ± SD: 1.5 ± 0.9 vs. 1.2 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). On the other hand, the reactive case resulted in significantly higher scores compared to the melancholic case and the one- in-between cases in regards to psychotherapy (mean ± SD: 4.9 ± 1.4 vs. 4.3 ± 1.4 vs. 4.7 ± 1.5, p < 0.001, respectively). Scores for informing patients that they suffered from "depression" were significantly higher in the melancholic case, compared to the reactive case (mean ± SD: 4.7 ± 1.7 vs. 2.2 ± 1.4, p < 0.001).Conclusions: Japanese psychiatrists distinguish between major depressive disorder with melancholic and reactive features, and thus choose different treatment strategies regarding pharmacological treatment and psychotherapy.

AB - Background: The dominant diagnostic model of the classification of depression today is unitarian; however, since Kurt Schneider (1920) introduced the concept of endogenous depression and reactive depression, the binary model has still often been used on a clinical basis. Notwithstanding this, to our knowledge, there have been no collective data on how psychiatrists differentiate these two conditions. We therefore conducted a survey to examine how psychiatrists in Japan differentiate patients with major depressive disorder who present mainly with melancholic features and those with reactive features.Methods: Three case scenarios of melancholic and reactive depression, and one-in-between were prepared. These cases were designed to present with at least 5 symptoms listed in the DSM-IV-TR with severity being mild. We have sent the questionnaires regarding treatment options and diagnosis for those three cases on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = "not appropriate", 4 = "cannot tell", and 7 = "appropriate"). Five hundred and two psychiatrists from over one hundred hospitals and community clinics throughout Japan have participated in this survey.Results: The melancholic case resulted significantly higher than the reactive case on either antidepressants (mean ± SD: 5.9 ± 1.2 vs. 3.6 ± 1.7, p < 0.001), hypnotics (mean ± SD: 5.5 ± 1.1 vs. 5.0 ± 1.3, p < 0.001), and electroconvulsive therapy (mean ± SD: 1.5 ± 0.9 vs. 1.2 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). On the other hand, the reactive case resulted in significantly higher scores compared to the melancholic case and the one- in-between cases in regards to psychotherapy (mean ± SD: 4.9 ± 1.4 vs. 4.3 ± 1.4 vs. 4.7 ± 1.5, p < 0.001, respectively). Scores for informing patients that they suffered from "depression" were significantly higher in the melancholic case, compared to the reactive case (mean ± SD: 4.7 ± 1.7 vs. 2.2 ± 1.4, p < 0.001).Conclusions: Japanese psychiatrists distinguish between major depressive disorder with melancholic and reactive features, and thus choose different treatment strategies regarding pharmacological treatment and psychotherapy.

KW - Antidepressant

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Melancholic depression

KW - Newcastle scale

KW - Reactive depression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887562553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887562553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-244X-13-311

DO - 10.1186/1471-244X-13-311

M3 - Article

C2 - 24237589

AN - SCOPUS:84887562553

VL - 13

JO - BMC Psychiatry

JF - BMC Psychiatry

SN - 1471-244X

M1 - 311

ER -