TY - JOUR
T1 - Mixed signals
T2 - employee reactions to talent status communication amidst strategic ambiguity
AU - Sumelius, Jennie
AU - Smale, Adam
AU - Yamao, Sachiko
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to the Marcus Wallenberg foundation for support for this project. Thanks are also due to M for help with data collection and to the School of Management at the University of New South Wales for providing an enjoyable working environment for Jennie Sumelius to work on this paper in 2017?2018.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/2/21
Y1 - 2020/2/21
N2 - Given the sensitive nature of communicating talent status in an ‘exclusive’ talent management system and the complexity involved in simultaneously sending signals of exclusivity and inclusivity, some organisations avoid open communication and instead opt for ‘strategic ambiguity’–intentionally maintaining an element of secrecy and information asymmetry. However, we know relatively little about the effects of this communication approach as a feature of the organisational context on the reactions of employees. Drawing on signalling theory, we examine the reactions of both talents and ‘B’ players on finding out about their talent status in the context of a company that adopts strategic ambiguity in its communication about talent. The data consists of 24 in-depth, qualitative interviews with individuals with experience of TM in a Finnish subsidiary of a large, US-based multinational corporation. The findings reveal that the contextual effects of strategic ambiguity in talent communication affected the reactions of talents and ‘B’ players in distinctly different ways, but had few long-term positive effects on the attitudes and behaviours of either group. These findings present important theoretical and practical implications for the role of communication and organisational context in employee reactions to talent pool inclusion and for talent management more generally.
AB - Given the sensitive nature of communicating talent status in an ‘exclusive’ talent management system and the complexity involved in simultaneously sending signals of exclusivity and inclusivity, some organisations avoid open communication and instead opt for ‘strategic ambiguity’–intentionally maintaining an element of secrecy and information asymmetry. However, we know relatively little about the effects of this communication approach as a feature of the organisational context on the reactions of employees. Drawing on signalling theory, we examine the reactions of both talents and ‘B’ players on finding out about their talent status in the context of a company that adopts strategic ambiguity in its communication about talent. The data consists of 24 in-depth, qualitative interviews with individuals with experience of TM in a Finnish subsidiary of a large, US-based multinational corporation. The findings reveal that the contextual effects of strategic ambiguity in talent communication affected the reactions of talents and ‘B’ players in distinctly different ways, but had few long-term positive effects on the attitudes and behaviours of either group. These findings present important theoretical and practical implications for the role of communication and organisational context in employee reactions to talent pool inclusion and for talent management more generally.
KW - Talent management
KW - communication
KW - employee outcomes
KW - multinational corporation
KW - talent status
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062457099&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062457099&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09585192.2018.1500388
DO - 10.1080/09585192.2018.1500388
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85062457099
SN - 0958-5192
VL - 31
SP - 511
EP - 538
JO - International Journal of Human Resource Management
JF - International Journal of Human Resource Management
IS - 4
ER -