More than one way to save an elephant: Foreign pressure and the Japanese policy process

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper pays special attention to three kinds of organizational or individual actors (foreign actors, environmental policy sponsors and an industrial policy community), and to the three streams of policy, problem and politics in the parts of the Japanese policy process affected by foreign pressure. Foreign actors play the roles of policy specialists, problem pointers and political activists when they exert pressure. These actors are assisted by environmental policy sponsors, the domestic actors who support foreign pressure for their own reasons. Whether foreign pressure will bring about a policy change also depends on the autonomy of an industrial policy community, which consists of the industry under pressure and the relevant government ministry. Using the three-actor/three-stream model, this case study describes the policy process leading up to Japan’s ban on imports of African elephant ivory in 1989 and tests several hypotheses drawn from the literature on political science and international relations. The conclusion of this paper is that the combination of NGO activity under the CITES regime and policy community fragmentation led to Japan’s acceptance of a ban on ivory imports. It also argues that foreign pressure can lead to a policy change even without powerful environmental policy sponsors at home.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-179
Number of pages13
JournalJapan Forum
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

environmental policy
industrial policy
ban
import
Japan
community
political science
fragmentation
ministry
international relations
non-governmental organization
acceptance
autonomy
regime
politics
industry
Policy Process
Sponsor
Environmental Policy
literature

Keywords

  • Foreign pressure
  • Policy change
  • The policy process
  • Three actors and three streams

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

More than one way to save an elephant : Foreign pressure and the Japanese policy process. / Miyaoka, Isao.

In: Japan Forum, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1998, p. 167-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd103efcc01646bf93da87dbf75e85f3,
title = "More than one way to save an elephant: Foreign pressure and the Japanese policy process",
abstract = "This paper pays special attention to three kinds of organizational or individual actors (foreign actors, environmental policy sponsors and an industrial policy community), and to the three streams of policy, problem and politics in the parts of the Japanese policy process affected by foreign pressure. Foreign actors play the roles of policy specialists, problem pointers and political activists when they exert pressure. These actors are assisted by environmental policy sponsors, the domestic actors who support foreign pressure for their own reasons. Whether foreign pressure will bring about a policy change also depends on the autonomy of an industrial policy community, which consists of the industry under pressure and the relevant government ministry. Using the three-actor/three-stream model, this case study describes the policy process leading up to Japan’s ban on imports of African elephant ivory in 1989 and tests several hypotheses drawn from the literature on political science and international relations. The conclusion of this paper is that the combination of NGO activity under the CITES regime and policy community fragmentation led to Japan’s acceptance of a ban on ivory imports. It also argues that foreign pressure can lead to a policy change even without powerful environmental policy sponsors at home.",
keywords = "Foreign pressure, Policy change, The policy process, Three actors and three streams",
author = "Isao Miyaoka",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1080/09555809808721611",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "167--179",
journal = "Japan Forum",
issn = "0955-5803",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - More than one way to save an elephant

T2 - Foreign pressure and the Japanese policy process

AU - Miyaoka, Isao

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - This paper pays special attention to three kinds of organizational or individual actors (foreign actors, environmental policy sponsors and an industrial policy community), and to the three streams of policy, problem and politics in the parts of the Japanese policy process affected by foreign pressure. Foreign actors play the roles of policy specialists, problem pointers and political activists when they exert pressure. These actors are assisted by environmental policy sponsors, the domestic actors who support foreign pressure for their own reasons. Whether foreign pressure will bring about a policy change also depends on the autonomy of an industrial policy community, which consists of the industry under pressure and the relevant government ministry. Using the three-actor/three-stream model, this case study describes the policy process leading up to Japan’s ban on imports of African elephant ivory in 1989 and tests several hypotheses drawn from the literature on political science and international relations. The conclusion of this paper is that the combination of NGO activity under the CITES regime and policy community fragmentation led to Japan’s acceptance of a ban on ivory imports. It also argues that foreign pressure can lead to a policy change even without powerful environmental policy sponsors at home.

AB - This paper pays special attention to three kinds of organizational or individual actors (foreign actors, environmental policy sponsors and an industrial policy community), and to the three streams of policy, problem and politics in the parts of the Japanese policy process affected by foreign pressure. Foreign actors play the roles of policy specialists, problem pointers and political activists when they exert pressure. These actors are assisted by environmental policy sponsors, the domestic actors who support foreign pressure for their own reasons. Whether foreign pressure will bring about a policy change also depends on the autonomy of an industrial policy community, which consists of the industry under pressure and the relevant government ministry. Using the three-actor/three-stream model, this case study describes the policy process leading up to Japan’s ban on imports of African elephant ivory in 1989 and tests several hypotheses drawn from the literature on political science and international relations. The conclusion of this paper is that the combination of NGO activity under the CITES regime and policy community fragmentation led to Japan’s acceptance of a ban on ivory imports. It also argues that foreign pressure can lead to a policy change even without powerful environmental policy sponsors at home.

KW - Foreign pressure

KW - Policy change

KW - The policy process

KW - Three actors and three streams

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902506074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902506074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09555809808721611

DO - 10.1080/09555809808721611

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84902506074

VL - 10

SP - 167

EP - 179

JO - Japan Forum

JF - Japan Forum

SN - 0955-5803

IS - 2

ER -