TY - JOUR
T1 - Multivariate analysis of variations in intrinsic foot musculature among hominoids
AU - Oishi, Motoharu
AU - Ogihara, Naomichi
AU - Shimizu, Daisuke
AU - Kikuchi, Yasuhiro
AU - Endo, Hideki
AU - Une, Yumi
AU - Soeta, Satoshi
AU - Amasaki, Hajime
AU - Ichihara, Nobutsune
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Dr. S. Kawada of the Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science; Dr. T. Wada, Osaka Museum of Natural History; Dr. N. Egi of the Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University; and all the staff of Chausuyama Zoo, Yamajiboku, Tama Zoological Park, Ueno Zoological Gardens, Kamine Zoo, Tennoji Zoo, Higashiyama Zoo and Botanical Garden, Yokohama Zoological Gardens, the Great Ape Information Network, and the Primate Research Institute of Kyoto University for kindly allowing us to dissect the specimens. This study was partly supported by the Cooperation Research Program of the Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, and KAKENHI (21370110, 23247041 and 25840171).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Anatomical Society
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - Comparative analysis of the foot muscle architecture among extant great apes is important for understanding the evolution of the human foot and, hence, human habitual bipedal walking. However, to our knowledge, there is no previous report of a quantitative comparison of hominoid intrinsic foot muscle dimensions. In the present study, we quantitatively compared muscle dimensions of the hominoid foot by means of multivariate analysis. The foot muscle mass and physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) of five chimpanzees, one bonobo, two gorillas, and six orangutans were obtained by our own dissections, and those of humans were taken from published accounts. The muscle mass and PCSA were respectively divided by the total mass and total PCSA of the intrinsic muscles of the entire foot for normalization. Variations in muscle architecture among human and extant great apes were quantified based on principal component analysis. Our results demonstrated that the muscle architecture of the orangutan was the most distinctive, having a larger first dorsal interosseous muscle and smaller abductor hallucis brevis muscle. On the other hand, the gorilla was found to be unique in having a larger abductor digiti minimi muscle. Humans were distinguished from extant great apes by a larger quadratus plantae muscle. The chimpanzee and the bonobo appeared to have very similar muscle architecture, with an intermediate position between the human and the orangutan. These differences (or similarities) in architecture of the intrinsic foot muscles among humans and great apes correspond well to the differences in phylogeny, positional behavior, and locomotion.
AB - Comparative analysis of the foot muscle architecture among extant great apes is important for understanding the evolution of the human foot and, hence, human habitual bipedal walking. However, to our knowledge, there is no previous report of a quantitative comparison of hominoid intrinsic foot muscle dimensions. In the present study, we quantitatively compared muscle dimensions of the hominoid foot by means of multivariate analysis. The foot muscle mass and physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) of five chimpanzees, one bonobo, two gorillas, and six orangutans were obtained by our own dissections, and those of humans were taken from published accounts. The muscle mass and PCSA were respectively divided by the total mass and total PCSA of the intrinsic muscles of the entire foot for normalization. Variations in muscle architecture among human and extant great apes were quantified based on principal component analysis. Our results demonstrated that the muscle architecture of the orangutan was the most distinctive, having a larger first dorsal interosseous muscle and smaller abductor hallucis brevis muscle. On the other hand, the gorilla was found to be unique in having a larger abductor digiti minimi muscle. Humans were distinguished from extant great apes by a larger quadratus plantae muscle. The chimpanzee and the bonobo appeared to have very similar muscle architecture, with an intermediate position between the human and the orangutan. These differences (or similarities) in architecture of the intrinsic foot muscles among humans and great apes correspond well to the differences in phylogeny, positional behavior, and locomotion.
KW - great apes
KW - human
KW - physiological cross-sectional area
KW - principal component analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044729070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044729070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/joa.12780
DO - 10.1111/joa.12780
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85044729070
SN - 0021-8782
VL - 232
SP - 812
EP - 823
JO - Journal of Anatomy
JF - Journal of Anatomy
IS - 5
ER -