Neural processing associated with comprehension of an indirect reply during a scenario reading task

Midori Shibata, Jun ichi Abe, Hiroaki Itoh, Koji Shimada, Satoshi Umeda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In daily communication, we often use indirect speech to convey our intention. However, little is known about the brain mechanisms that underlie the comprehension of indirect speech. In this study, we conducted a functional MRI experiment using a scenario reading task to compare the neural activity induced by an indirect reply (a type of indirect speech) and a literal sentence. Participants read a short scenario consisting of three sentences. The first two sentences explained the situation of the protagonists, whereas the third sentence had an indirect, literal, or unconnected meaning. The indirect reply condition primarily activated the bilateral fronto-temporal networks (Brodmann's Areas (BA) 47 and 21) and the dorso-medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). In the literal sentence condition, only the left fronto-temporal network (BA 45 and 21) and the dmPFC (posterior region) were activated. In addition, we found greater activation resulting from comprehension of an indirect reply than from literal sentence comprehension in the dmPFC, the left middle frontal area (BA 9), the bilateral inferior frontal area (BA 9/47), and the right middle temporal area (BA 21). Our findings indicate that the right and left fronto-temporal networks play a crucial role in detecting contextual violations, whereas the medial frontal cortex is important for generating inferences to make sense of remarks within a context.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3542-3550
Number of pages9
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume49
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Nov

Fingerprint

Reading
Prefrontal Cortex
Frontal Lobe
Communication
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Scenarios
Brain
Indirect Speech

Keywords

  • Functional MRI
  • Indirect reply
  • Inference
  • Mentalizing
  • Pragmatics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Neural processing associated with comprehension of an indirect reply during a scenario reading task. / Shibata, Midori; Abe, Jun ichi; Itoh, Hiroaki; Shimada, Koji; Umeda, Satoshi.

In: Neuropsychologia, Vol. 49, No. 13, 11.2011, p. 3542-3550.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shibata, Midori ; Abe, Jun ichi ; Itoh, Hiroaki ; Shimada, Koji ; Umeda, Satoshi. / Neural processing associated with comprehension of an indirect reply during a scenario reading task. In: Neuropsychologia. 2011 ; Vol. 49, No. 13. pp. 3542-3550.
@article{7dedb949cb3a42c1bf02bef11e6009ee,
title = "Neural processing associated with comprehension of an indirect reply during a scenario reading task",
abstract = "In daily communication, we often use indirect speech to convey our intention. However, little is known about the brain mechanisms that underlie the comprehension of indirect speech. In this study, we conducted a functional MRI experiment using a scenario reading task to compare the neural activity induced by an indirect reply (a type of indirect speech) and a literal sentence. Participants read a short scenario consisting of three sentences. The first two sentences explained the situation of the protagonists, whereas the third sentence had an indirect, literal, or unconnected meaning. The indirect reply condition primarily activated the bilateral fronto-temporal networks (Brodmann's Areas (BA) 47 and 21) and the dorso-medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). In the literal sentence condition, only the left fronto-temporal network (BA 45 and 21) and the dmPFC (posterior region) were activated. In addition, we found greater activation resulting from comprehension of an indirect reply than from literal sentence comprehension in the dmPFC, the left middle frontal area (BA 9), the bilateral inferior frontal area (BA 9/47), and the right middle temporal area (BA 21). Our findings indicate that the right and left fronto-temporal networks play a crucial role in detecting contextual violations, whereas the medial frontal cortex is important for generating inferences to make sense of remarks within a context.",
keywords = "Functional MRI, Indirect reply, Inference, Mentalizing, Pragmatics",
author = "Midori Shibata and Abe, {Jun ichi} and Hiroaki Itoh and Koji Shimada and Satoshi Umeda",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.006",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "3542--3550",
journal = "Neuropsychologia",
issn = "0028-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neural processing associated with comprehension of an indirect reply during a scenario reading task

AU - Shibata, Midori

AU - Abe, Jun ichi

AU - Itoh, Hiroaki

AU - Shimada, Koji

AU - Umeda, Satoshi

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - In daily communication, we often use indirect speech to convey our intention. However, little is known about the brain mechanisms that underlie the comprehension of indirect speech. In this study, we conducted a functional MRI experiment using a scenario reading task to compare the neural activity induced by an indirect reply (a type of indirect speech) and a literal sentence. Participants read a short scenario consisting of three sentences. The first two sentences explained the situation of the protagonists, whereas the third sentence had an indirect, literal, or unconnected meaning. The indirect reply condition primarily activated the bilateral fronto-temporal networks (Brodmann's Areas (BA) 47 and 21) and the dorso-medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). In the literal sentence condition, only the left fronto-temporal network (BA 45 and 21) and the dmPFC (posterior region) were activated. In addition, we found greater activation resulting from comprehension of an indirect reply than from literal sentence comprehension in the dmPFC, the left middle frontal area (BA 9), the bilateral inferior frontal area (BA 9/47), and the right middle temporal area (BA 21). Our findings indicate that the right and left fronto-temporal networks play a crucial role in detecting contextual violations, whereas the medial frontal cortex is important for generating inferences to make sense of remarks within a context.

AB - In daily communication, we often use indirect speech to convey our intention. However, little is known about the brain mechanisms that underlie the comprehension of indirect speech. In this study, we conducted a functional MRI experiment using a scenario reading task to compare the neural activity induced by an indirect reply (a type of indirect speech) and a literal sentence. Participants read a short scenario consisting of three sentences. The first two sentences explained the situation of the protagonists, whereas the third sentence had an indirect, literal, or unconnected meaning. The indirect reply condition primarily activated the bilateral fronto-temporal networks (Brodmann's Areas (BA) 47 and 21) and the dorso-medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). In the literal sentence condition, only the left fronto-temporal network (BA 45 and 21) and the dmPFC (posterior region) were activated. In addition, we found greater activation resulting from comprehension of an indirect reply than from literal sentence comprehension in the dmPFC, the left middle frontal area (BA 9), the bilateral inferior frontal area (BA 9/47), and the right middle temporal area (BA 21). Our findings indicate that the right and left fronto-temporal networks play a crucial role in detecting contextual violations, whereas the medial frontal cortex is important for generating inferences to make sense of remarks within a context.

KW - Functional MRI

KW - Indirect reply

KW - Inference

KW - Mentalizing

KW - Pragmatics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80755153647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80755153647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 21930137

AN - SCOPUS:80755153647

VL - 49

SP - 3542

EP - 3550

JO - Neuropsychologia

JF - Neuropsychologia

SN - 0028-3932

IS - 13

ER -