[Neuropsychological testing in medicolegal cases].

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Because the assessment of cognitive function is among the most important diagnostic evaluations in medicolegal cases, neuropsychological testing, the optimal scientific method available to determine the manifestation of brain dysfunction, is a potentially very strong tool in those cases. However, the use of neuropsychological testing in a medicolegal setting should be done with caution. Firstly, the nature of any neuropsychological testing is complex, and cannot be simplified as "Test A measures Function A' ". Oversimplified explanation of a test is misleading, resulting in serious misjudgment in the legal procedure. Secondly, the result of the test shows someone's cognitive function at the time of the test, not the time of the act in question (i. e., a crime). Finally and most importantly, the cognitive function measured by neuropsychological testing does not directly correspond to the legal questions being asked, even when the terms used in the fields of law and neuroscience are similar. In determining whether an individual meets a specified legal standard (e. g., criminal responsibility), the results of neuropsychological testing are far from sufficient and substantial additional information is required. With these caveats in mind, an expert witness should carefully choose the neuropsychological testing battery in each case, which may greatly help to understand the individual's mental state at the time of the act in question.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1051-1056
Number of pages6
JournalSeishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica
Volume115
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Cognition
Expert Testimony
Crime
Neurosciences
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

[Neuropsychological testing in medicolegal cases]. / Muramatsu, Taro.

In: Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica, Vol. 115, No. 10, 2013, p. 1051-1056.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ce7ec58dc0cc4af8971f860ccb989e32,
title = "[Neuropsychological testing in medicolegal cases].",
abstract = "Because the assessment of cognitive function is among the most important diagnostic evaluations in medicolegal cases, neuropsychological testing, the optimal scientific method available to determine the manifestation of brain dysfunction, is a potentially very strong tool in those cases. However, the use of neuropsychological testing in a medicolegal setting should be done with caution. Firstly, the nature of any neuropsychological testing is complex, and cannot be simplified as {"}Test A measures Function A' {"}. Oversimplified explanation of a test is misleading, resulting in serious misjudgment in the legal procedure. Secondly, the result of the test shows someone's cognitive function at the time of the test, not the time of the act in question (i. e., a crime). Finally and most importantly, the cognitive function measured by neuropsychological testing does not directly correspond to the legal questions being asked, even when the terms used in the fields of law and neuroscience are similar. In determining whether an individual meets a specified legal standard (e. g., criminal responsibility), the results of neuropsychological testing are far from sufficient and substantial additional information is required. With these caveats in mind, an expert witness should carefully choose the neuropsychological testing battery in each case, which may greatly help to understand the individual's mental state at the time of the act in question.",
author = "Taro Muramatsu",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "1051--1056",
journal = "Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica",
issn = "0033-2658",
publisher = "Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - [Neuropsychological testing in medicolegal cases].

AU - Muramatsu, Taro

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Because the assessment of cognitive function is among the most important diagnostic evaluations in medicolegal cases, neuropsychological testing, the optimal scientific method available to determine the manifestation of brain dysfunction, is a potentially very strong tool in those cases. However, the use of neuropsychological testing in a medicolegal setting should be done with caution. Firstly, the nature of any neuropsychological testing is complex, and cannot be simplified as "Test A measures Function A' ". Oversimplified explanation of a test is misleading, resulting in serious misjudgment in the legal procedure. Secondly, the result of the test shows someone's cognitive function at the time of the test, not the time of the act in question (i. e., a crime). Finally and most importantly, the cognitive function measured by neuropsychological testing does not directly correspond to the legal questions being asked, even when the terms used in the fields of law and neuroscience are similar. In determining whether an individual meets a specified legal standard (e. g., criminal responsibility), the results of neuropsychological testing are far from sufficient and substantial additional information is required. With these caveats in mind, an expert witness should carefully choose the neuropsychological testing battery in each case, which may greatly help to understand the individual's mental state at the time of the act in question.

AB - Because the assessment of cognitive function is among the most important diagnostic evaluations in medicolegal cases, neuropsychological testing, the optimal scientific method available to determine the manifestation of brain dysfunction, is a potentially very strong tool in those cases. However, the use of neuropsychological testing in a medicolegal setting should be done with caution. Firstly, the nature of any neuropsychological testing is complex, and cannot be simplified as "Test A measures Function A' ". Oversimplified explanation of a test is misleading, resulting in serious misjudgment in the legal procedure. Secondly, the result of the test shows someone's cognitive function at the time of the test, not the time of the act in question (i. e., a crime). Finally and most importantly, the cognitive function measured by neuropsychological testing does not directly correspond to the legal questions being asked, even when the terms used in the fields of law and neuroscience are similar. In determining whether an individual meets a specified legal standard (e. g., criminal responsibility), the results of neuropsychological testing are far from sufficient and substantial additional information is required. With these caveats in mind, an expert witness should carefully choose the neuropsychological testing battery in each case, which may greatly help to understand the individual's mental state at the time of the act in question.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896143463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896143463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 24341071

AN - SCOPUS:84896143463

VL - 115

SP - 1051

EP - 1056

JO - Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica

JF - Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica

SN - 0033-2658

IS - 10

ER -