New terminology for intrauterine endometrial samples: A group study by the Japanese society of clinical cytology

Kenji Yanoh, Yasuo Hirai, Atsuhiko Sakamoto, Daisuke Aoki, Takuya Moriya, Masamichi Hiura, Takaharu Yamawaki, Keiko Shimizu, Hiroki Nakayama, Hiroshi Sasaki, Tsutomu Tabata, Masatsugu Ueda, Yasuhiro Udagawa, Yoshiaki Norimatsu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of endometrial cytology obtained by intrauterine sample using a descriptive reporting format for endometrial cytological diagnosis. Study Design: 10,152 consecutive endometrial scrapings obtained in 13 different Japanese hospitals were analyzed. Cytological results were classified as 'negative for malignancy', 'atypical endometrial cells' (ATEC), 'endometrial hyperplasia', 'atypical endometrial hyperplasia' or 'malignant tumor'. ATEC was subclassified as 'ATEC, of undetermined significance' (ATEC-US) and 'ATEC, cannot exclude atypical endometrial hyperplasia or more' (ATEC-A). Cytological results were compared with the histological diagnosis as a gold standard. When the cytological result was 'negative for malignancy' and there was no subsequent histological examination, the case was considered a true negative when the endometrium was assessed as normal on transvaginal ultrasonography and there was no abnormal uterine bleeding. Results: 1,083 cases in which histology was not performed, 557 cases of 'unsatisfactory specimen' and 76 cases of ATEC-US were excluded. In the remaining 8,436 cases, the sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for detecting atypical endometrial hyperplasia or malignant tumors were 79.0 and 99.7, 92.9 and 98.9%, respectively. Conclusion: The current diagnostic standards for endometrial cytology in Japan were established. Specificity is satisfactory for excluding cancer or precancerous diseases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-241
Number of pages9
JournalActa Cytologica
Volume56
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Terminology
Cell Biology
Endometrial Hyperplasia
Neoplasms
Sensitivity and Specificity
Uterine Hemorrhage
Endometrium
Ultrasonography
Histology
Japan

Keywords

  • Descriptive reporting format
  • Endometrial cytology
  • Group study
  • Intrauterine sampling
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Histology

Cite this

New terminology for intrauterine endometrial samples : A group study by the Japanese society of clinical cytology. / Yanoh, Kenji; Hirai, Yasuo; Sakamoto, Atsuhiko; Aoki, Daisuke; Moriya, Takuya; Hiura, Masamichi; Yamawaki, Takaharu; Shimizu, Keiko; Nakayama, Hiroki; Sasaki, Hiroshi; Tabata, Tsutomu; Ueda, Masatsugu; Udagawa, Yasuhiro; Norimatsu, Yoshiaki.

In: Acta Cytologica, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2012, p. 233-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yanoh, K, Hirai, Y, Sakamoto, A, Aoki, D, Moriya, T, Hiura, M, Yamawaki, T, Shimizu, K, Nakayama, H, Sasaki, H, Tabata, T, Ueda, M, Udagawa, Y & Norimatsu, Y 2012, 'New terminology for intrauterine endometrial samples: A group study by the Japanese society of clinical cytology', Acta Cytologica, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1159/000336258
Yanoh, Kenji ; Hirai, Yasuo ; Sakamoto, Atsuhiko ; Aoki, Daisuke ; Moriya, Takuya ; Hiura, Masamichi ; Yamawaki, Takaharu ; Shimizu, Keiko ; Nakayama, Hiroki ; Sasaki, Hiroshi ; Tabata, Tsutomu ; Ueda, Masatsugu ; Udagawa, Yasuhiro ; Norimatsu, Yoshiaki. / New terminology for intrauterine endometrial samples : A group study by the Japanese society of clinical cytology. In: Acta Cytologica. 2012 ; Vol. 56, No. 3. pp. 233-241.
@article{aa9180b5dde040b1b979107aa8c4ea33,
title = "New terminology for intrauterine endometrial samples: A group study by the Japanese society of clinical cytology",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of endometrial cytology obtained by intrauterine sample using a descriptive reporting format for endometrial cytological diagnosis. Study Design: 10,152 consecutive endometrial scrapings obtained in 13 different Japanese hospitals were analyzed. Cytological results were classified as 'negative for malignancy', 'atypical endometrial cells' (ATEC), 'endometrial hyperplasia', 'atypical endometrial hyperplasia' or 'malignant tumor'. ATEC was subclassified as 'ATEC, of undetermined significance' (ATEC-US) and 'ATEC, cannot exclude atypical endometrial hyperplasia or more' (ATEC-A). Cytological results were compared with the histological diagnosis as a gold standard. When the cytological result was 'negative for malignancy' and there was no subsequent histological examination, the case was considered a true negative when the endometrium was assessed as normal on transvaginal ultrasonography and there was no abnormal uterine bleeding. Results: 1,083 cases in which histology was not performed, 557 cases of 'unsatisfactory specimen' and 76 cases of ATEC-US were excluded. In the remaining 8,436 cases, the sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for detecting atypical endometrial hyperplasia or malignant tumors were 79.0 and 99.7, 92.9 and 98.9{\%}, respectively. Conclusion: The current diagnostic standards for endometrial cytology in Japan were established. Specificity is satisfactory for excluding cancer or precancerous diseases.",
keywords = "Descriptive reporting format, Endometrial cytology, Group study, Intrauterine sampling, Sensitivity, Specificity",
author = "Kenji Yanoh and Yasuo Hirai and Atsuhiko Sakamoto and Daisuke Aoki and Takuya Moriya and Masamichi Hiura and Takaharu Yamawaki and Keiko Shimizu and Hiroki Nakayama and Hiroshi Sasaki and Tsutomu Tabata and Masatsugu Ueda and Yasuhiro Udagawa and Yoshiaki Norimatsu",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1159/000336258",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "233--241",
journal = "Acta Cytologica",
issn = "0001-5547",
publisher = "Science Printers and Publishers Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - New terminology for intrauterine endometrial samples

T2 - A group study by the Japanese society of clinical cytology

AU - Yanoh, Kenji

AU - Hirai, Yasuo

AU - Sakamoto, Atsuhiko

AU - Aoki, Daisuke

AU - Moriya, Takuya

AU - Hiura, Masamichi

AU - Yamawaki, Takaharu

AU - Shimizu, Keiko

AU - Nakayama, Hiroki

AU - Sasaki, Hiroshi

AU - Tabata, Tsutomu

AU - Ueda, Masatsugu

AU - Udagawa, Yasuhiro

AU - Norimatsu, Yoshiaki

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of endometrial cytology obtained by intrauterine sample using a descriptive reporting format for endometrial cytological diagnosis. Study Design: 10,152 consecutive endometrial scrapings obtained in 13 different Japanese hospitals were analyzed. Cytological results were classified as 'negative for malignancy', 'atypical endometrial cells' (ATEC), 'endometrial hyperplasia', 'atypical endometrial hyperplasia' or 'malignant tumor'. ATEC was subclassified as 'ATEC, of undetermined significance' (ATEC-US) and 'ATEC, cannot exclude atypical endometrial hyperplasia or more' (ATEC-A). Cytological results were compared with the histological diagnosis as a gold standard. When the cytological result was 'negative for malignancy' and there was no subsequent histological examination, the case was considered a true negative when the endometrium was assessed as normal on transvaginal ultrasonography and there was no abnormal uterine bleeding. Results: 1,083 cases in which histology was not performed, 557 cases of 'unsatisfactory specimen' and 76 cases of ATEC-US were excluded. In the remaining 8,436 cases, the sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for detecting atypical endometrial hyperplasia or malignant tumors were 79.0 and 99.7, 92.9 and 98.9%, respectively. Conclusion: The current diagnostic standards for endometrial cytology in Japan were established. Specificity is satisfactory for excluding cancer or precancerous diseases.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of endometrial cytology obtained by intrauterine sample using a descriptive reporting format for endometrial cytological diagnosis. Study Design: 10,152 consecutive endometrial scrapings obtained in 13 different Japanese hospitals were analyzed. Cytological results were classified as 'negative for malignancy', 'atypical endometrial cells' (ATEC), 'endometrial hyperplasia', 'atypical endometrial hyperplasia' or 'malignant tumor'. ATEC was subclassified as 'ATEC, of undetermined significance' (ATEC-US) and 'ATEC, cannot exclude atypical endometrial hyperplasia or more' (ATEC-A). Cytological results were compared with the histological diagnosis as a gold standard. When the cytological result was 'negative for malignancy' and there was no subsequent histological examination, the case was considered a true negative when the endometrium was assessed as normal on transvaginal ultrasonography and there was no abnormal uterine bleeding. Results: 1,083 cases in which histology was not performed, 557 cases of 'unsatisfactory specimen' and 76 cases of ATEC-US were excluded. In the remaining 8,436 cases, the sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for detecting atypical endometrial hyperplasia or malignant tumors were 79.0 and 99.7, 92.9 and 98.9%, respectively. Conclusion: The current diagnostic standards for endometrial cytology in Japan were established. Specificity is satisfactory for excluding cancer or precancerous diseases.

KW - Descriptive reporting format

KW - Endometrial cytology

KW - Group study

KW - Intrauterine sampling

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Specificity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860767443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860767443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000336258

DO - 10.1159/000336258

M3 - Article

C2 - 22555523

AN - SCOPUS:84860767443

VL - 56

SP - 233

EP - 241

JO - Acta Cytologica

JF - Acta Cytologica

SN - 0001-5547

IS - 3

ER -