TY - JOUR
T1 - Nonradiographic measurement of hallux valgus angle using self-photography
AU - Yamaguchi, Satoshi
AU - Sadamasu, Aya
AU - Kimura, Seiji
AU - Akagi, Ryuichiro
AU - Yamamoto, Yohei
AU - Sato, Yasunori
AU - Sasho, Takahisa
AU - Ohtori, Seiji
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright ©2019 Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy.
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - BACKGROUND: Radiographs of the feet are the reference standard for measuring the hallux valgus angle. However, the availability and use of radiographs are constrained due to cost and radiation exposure. Less invasive, nonradiographic assessments have been proposed, although measurement using self-photography has not been reported. t OBJECTIVES: To determine (1) reliability of photographic hallux valgus angle (pHVA) measurement using the same photographs of the feet, (2) reliability of repeated self-photography trials, and (3) measurement error when the radiographic hallux valgus angle (rHVA) is estimated using the pHVA. t METHODS: In this reliability study, participants took photographs of their own feet using a digital camera. The intrarater and interrater reliability of pHVA measurements were then assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% minimum detectable change (MDC). The participants took photographs twice, and the reliability of repeated self-photography trials was examined. Participants also received radiographs of their feet, from which the rHVA was measured. The measurement error was assessed using the mean difference and 95% limits of agreement. t RESULTS: The intrarater and interrater ICC of pHVA measurement was 0.99, with MDCs less tha 2°. The ICC of pHVA measurement for repeated self-photography was 0.96, and the MDC was 6.9° The pHVA was systematically lower than the rHVA by 5.3°. t CONCLUSION: Measurement of the pHVA using self-photography was reproducible, althoug pHVA measurement underestimated the rHVA. Th pHVA can be a useful nonradiographic method to uantify hallux valgus deformity.
AB - BACKGROUND: Radiographs of the feet are the reference standard for measuring the hallux valgus angle. However, the availability and use of radiographs are constrained due to cost and radiation exposure. Less invasive, nonradiographic assessments have been proposed, although measurement using self-photography has not been reported. t OBJECTIVES: To determine (1) reliability of photographic hallux valgus angle (pHVA) measurement using the same photographs of the feet, (2) reliability of repeated self-photography trials, and (3) measurement error when the radiographic hallux valgus angle (rHVA) is estimated using the pHVA. t METHODS: In this reliability study, participants took photographs of their own feet using a digital camera. The intrarater and interrater reliability of pHVA measurements were then assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% minimum detectable change (MDC). The participants took photographs twice, and the reliability of repeated self-photography trials was examined. Participants also received radiographs of their feet, from which the rHVA was measured. The measurement error was assessed using the mean difference and 95% limits of agreement. t RESULTS: The intrarater and interrater ICC of pHVA measurement was 0.99, with MDCs less tha 2°. The ICC of pHVA measurement for repeated self-photography was 0.96, and the MDC was 6.9° The pHVA was systematically lower than the rHVA by 5.3°. t CONCLUSION: Measurement of the pHVA using self-photography was reproducible, althoug pHVA measurement underestimated the rHVA. Th pHVA can be a useful nonradiographic method to uantify hallux valgus deformity.
KW - Clinical measurement
KW - Digital camera
KW - Foot
KW - Hallux valgus
KW - Radiology
KW - Self-photography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061042842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061042842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2519/jospt.2019.8280
DO - 10.2519/jospt.2019.8280
M3 - Article
C2 - 30208796
AN - SCOPUS:85061042842
SN - 0190-6011
VL - 49
SP - 80
EP - 86
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
IS - 2
ER -