Ocular surface changes and discomfort in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction

J. Shimazaki, M. Sakala, Kazuo Tsubota

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

293 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the importance of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) on the ocular surface. Design: Prospective study. Setting: A university-based referral practice. Patients: Patients with ocular discomfort (147 eyes) and without ocular discomfort (54 eyes) were examined. In the total 201 eyes, MGD was defined as the presence of an obstruction of the meibomian orifices (obstruction group [n=54[) or the absence of a gland structure (gland dropout group [n-36]), or both of these findings (combined group [n=38]). There were not any findings of MGD in 73 eyes (non-MGD group). Main Outcome Measures: Scores that were obtained from fluorescein and rose bengal staining, the breakup time of the tear film, the rates of tear evaporation and tear production, and meibography. Results: Of the 147 eyes with ocular discomfort, 95 (64.6%) had either an obstruction of an orifice or gland dropout, or both. The combined group had higher scores for staining with fluorescein (P=.002) and rose bengal (P=.021) compared with that in the non-MGD group. The rate of tear production was increased more in the gland dropout group than in the non-MGD group (P=.002). The rate of tear evaporation was significantly increased in the gland dropout group (P=.017). Conclusion: Meibomian gland dysfunction is a major cause of ocular surface abnormalities and ocular discomfort.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1266-1270
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Ophthalmology
Volume113
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Meibomian Glands
Tears
Rose Bengal
Fluorescein
Eye Abnormalities
Staining and Labeling
Referral and Consultation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Ocular surface changes and discomfort in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction. / Shimazaki, J.; Sakala, M.; Tsubota, Kazuo.

In: Archives of Ophthalmology, Vol. 113, No. 10, 1995, p. 1266-1270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{edaf6dc7e7b04ad3b4adcec708066095,
title = "Ocular surface changes and discomfort in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the importance of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) on the ocular surface. Design: Prospective study. Setting: A university-based referral practice. Patients: Patients with ocular discomfort (147 eyes) and without ocular discomfort (54 eyes) were examined. In the total 201 eyes, MGD was defined as the presence of an obstruction of the meibomian orifices (obstruction group [n=54[) or the absence of a gland structure (gland dropout group [n-36]), or both of these findings (combined group [n=38]). There were not any findings of MGD in 73 eyes (non-MGD group). Main Outcome Measures: Scores that were obtained from fluorescein and rose bengal staining, the breakup time of the tear film, the rates of tear evaporation and tear production, and meibography. Results: Of the 147 eyes with ocular discomfort, 95 (64.6{\%}) had either an obstruction of an orifice or gland dropout, or both. The combined group had higher scores for staining with fluorescein (P=.002) and rose bengal (P=.021) compared with that in the non-MGD group. The rate of tear production was increased more in the gland dropout group than in the non-MGD group (P=.002). The rate of tear evaporation was significantly increased in the gland dropout group (P=.017). Conclusion: Meibomian gland dysfunction is a major cause of ocular surface abnormalities and ocular discomfort.",
author = "J. Shimazaki and M. Sakala and Kazuo Tsubota",
year = "1995",
language = "English",
volume = "113",
pages = "1266--1270",
journal = "JAMA Ophthalmology",
issn = "2168-6165",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ocular surface changes and discomfort in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction

AU - Shimazaki, J.

AU - Sakala, M.

AU - Tsubota, Kazuo

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Objective: To determine the importance of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) on the ocular surface. Design: Prospective study. Setting: A university-based referral practice. Patients: Patients with ocular discomfort (147 eyes) and without ocular discomfort (54 eyes) were examined. In the total 201 eyes, MGD was defined as the presence of an obstruction of the meibomian orifices (obstruction group [n=54[) or the absence of a gland structure (gland dropout group [n-36]), or both of these findings (combined group [n=38]). There were not any findings of MGD in 73 eyes (non-MGD group). Main Outcome Measures: Scores that were obtained from fluorescein and rose bengal staining, the breakup time of the tear film, the rates of tear evaporation and tear production, and meibography. Results: Of the 147 eyes with ocular discomfort, 95 (64.6%) had either an obstruction of an orifice or gland dropout, or both. The combined group had higher scores for staining with fluorescein (P=.002) and rose bengal (P=.021) compared with that in the non-MGD group. The rate of tear production was increased more in the gland dropout group than in the non-MGD group (P=.002). The rate of tear evaporation was significantly increased in the gland dropout group (P=.017). Conclusion: Meibomian gland dysfunction is a major cause of ocular surface abnormalities and ocular discomfort.

AB - Objective: To determine the importance of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) on the ocular surface. Design: Prospective study. Setting: A university-based referral practice. Patients: Patients with ocular discomfort (147 eyes) and without ocular discomfort (54 eyes) were examined. In the total 201 eyes, MGD was defined as the presence of an obstruction of the meibomian orifices (obstruction group [n=54[) or the absence of a gland structure (gland dropout group [n-36]), or both of these findings (combined group [n=38]). There were not any findings of MGD in 73 eyes (non-MGD group). Main Outcome Measures: Scores that were obtained from fluorescein and rose bengal staining, the breakup time of the tear film, the rates of tear evaporation and tear production, and meibography. Results: Of the 147 eyes with ocular discomfort, 95 (64.6%) had either an obstruction of an orifice or gland dropout, or both. The combined group had higher scores for staining with fluorescein (P=.002) and rose bengal (P=.021) compared with that in the non-MGD group. The rate of tear production was increased more in the gland dropout group than in the non-MGD group (P=.002). The rate of tear evaporation was significantly increased in the gland dropout group (P=.017). Conclusion: Meibomian gland dysfunction is a major cause of ocular surface abnormalities and ocular discomfort.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029122806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029122806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 113

SP - 1266

EP - 1270

JO - JAMA Ophthalmology

JF - JAMA Ophthalmology

SN - 2168-6165

IS - 10

ER -