On loss aversion in capuchin monkeys

Alan Silberberg, Peter G. Roma, Mary E. Huntsberry, Frederick R. Warren-Boulton, Takayuki Sakagami, Angela M. Ruggiero, Stephen J. Suomi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Chen, Lakshminarayanan, and Santos (2006) claim to show in three choice experiments that monkeys react rationally to price and wealth shocks, but, when faced with gambles, display hallmark, human-like biases that include loss aversion. We present three experiments with monkeys and humans consistent with a reinterpretation of their data that attributes their results not to loss aversion, but to differences between choice alternatives in delay of reinforcement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-155
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Volume89
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Sep 26

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Choice
  • Delay of reinforcement
  • Humans
  • Loss aversion
  • Monkeys
  • Prospect theory
  • Reversed contingency
  • Token exchange

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Silberberg, A., Roma, P. G., Huntsberry, M. E., Warren-Boulton, F. R., Sakagami, T., Ruggiero, A. M., & Suomi, S. J. (2008). On loss aversion in capuchin monkeys. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 89(2), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2008-89-145