Abstract
Chen, Lakshminarayanan, and Santos (2006) claim to show in three choice experiments that monkeys react rationally to price and wealth shocks, but, when faced with gambles, display hallmark, human-like biases that include loss aversion. We present three experiments with monkeys and humans consistent with a reinterpretation of their data that attributes their results not to loss aversion, but to differences between choice alternatives in delay of reinforcement.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 145-155 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior |
Volume | 89 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Choice
- Delay of reinforcement
- Humans
- Loss aversion
- Monkeys
- Prospect theory
- Reversed contingency
- Token exchange
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Behavioral Neuroscience