On the development strategy of countries of intermediate size-An analysis of heterogeneous firms in a multi-region framework

Rikard Forslid, Toshihiro Okubo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares two policies: trade cost reduction and firm relocation cost reduction using a three-country version of a heterogeneous-firms geography and trade model, where the three countries have different market (population) sizes. We show how the effects of the two policies differ, in particular for the country of intermediate size. Unless the intermediate country is very small, in a relative sense, it will gain industry when relocation costs are reduced, but lose industry when trade costs are reduced. The smallest country loses industry in both cases, but only experiences lower welfare in the case of lower relocation costs. Thus, the ranking of the policies from the point of view of the two small and intermediate countries tends to be the opposite.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)747-756
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Economic Review
Volume56
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 May

Fingerprint

Heterogeneous firms
Development strategy
Relocation
Industry
Trade costs
Costs
Geography
Ranking
Small countries

Keywords

  • Agglomeration
  • Firm heterogeneity
  • Multi-country model
  • Relocation costs
  • Trade liberalisation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Finance

Cite this

On the development strategy of countries of intermediate size-An analysis of heterogeneous firms in a multi-region framework. / Forslid, Rikard; Okubo, Toshihiro.

In: European Economic Review, Vol. 56, No. 4, 05.2012, p. 747-756.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c1dbe80eabae498ea3e69ec60213e812,
title = "On the development strategy of countries of intermediate size-An analysis of heterogeneous firms in a multi-region framework",
abstract = "This paper compares two policies: trade cost reduction and firm relocation cost reduction using a three-country version of a heterogeneous-firms geography and trade model, where the three countries have different market (population) sizes. We show how the effects of the two policies differ, in particular for the country of intermediate size. Unless the intermediate country is very small, in a relative sense, it will gain industry when relocation costs are reduced, but lose industry when trade costs are reduced. The smallest country loses industry in both cases, but only experiences lower welfare in the case of lower relocation costs. Thus, the ranking of the policies from the point of view of the two small and intermediate countries tends to be the opposite.",
keywords = "Agglomeration, Firm heterogeneity, Multi-country model, Relocation costs, Trade liberalisation",
author = "Rikard Forslid and Toshihiro Okubo",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.01.006",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "747--756",
journal = "European Economic Review",
issn = "0014-2921",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the development strategy of countries of intermediate size-An analysis of heterogeneous firms in a multi-region framework

AU - Forslid, Rikard

AU - Okubo, Toshihiro

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - This paper compares two policies: trade cost reduction and firm relocation cost reduction using a three-country version of a heterogeneous-firms geography and trade model, where the three countries have different market (population) sizes. We show how the effects of the two policies differ, in particular for the country of intermediate size. Unless the intermediate country is very small, in a relative sense, it will gain industry when relocation costs are reduced, but lose industry when trade costs are reduced. The smallest country loses industry in both cases, but only experiences lower welfare in the case of lower relocation costs. Thus, the ranking of the policies from the point of view of the two small and intermediate countries tends to be the opposite.

AB - This paper compares two policies: trade cost reduction and firm relocation cost reduction using a three-country version of a heterogeneous-firms geography and trade model, where the three countries have different market (population) sizes. We show how the effects of the two policies differ, in particular for the country of intermediate size. Unless the intermediate country is very small, in a relative sense, it will gain industry when relocation costs are reduced, but lose industry when trade costs are reduced. The smallest country loses industry in both cases, but only experiences lower welfare in the case of lower relocation costs. Thus, the ranking of the policies from the point of view of the two small and intermediate countries tends to be the opposite.

KW - Agglomeration

KW - Firm heterogeneity

KW - Multi-country model

KW - Relocation costs

KW - Trade liberalisation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860572248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860572248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.01.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84860572248

VL - 56

SP - 747

EP - 756

JO - European Economic Review

JF - European Economic Review

SN - 0014-2921

IS - 4

ER -