TY - JOUR
T1 - On the inclusiveness of rural road improvement
T2 - Evidence from Morocco
AU - Shimamura, Yasuharu
AU - Shimizutani, Satoshi
AU - Yamada, Eiji
AU - Yamada, Hiroyuki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Review of Development Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - This paper explores the heterogeneous impact of a rural road improvement project on the economic activities and living standards of households in Morocco. Road pavement improvements are expected to promote better market access, encourage the transformation of traditional agricultural activities, and create opportunities for new economic activities. However, benefits may not extend evenly across different groups, and the distributional consequences call for careful empirical investigation. We employ a difference-in-differences (DID) estimation using a household-level panel dataset collected under a quasi-experimental setting in the 2010s. We classify households into three groups based on asset holdings (rich, middle, and poor). We provide several new findings. First, there was no significant transformation of agricultural production or sales for all groups. Second, rich households increased hired agricultural labor and began paid employment while middle households started new family businesses. Poor households, however, did not enjoy these new employment opportunities except for a marginal increase in family businesses. Third, due to shifts in employment, the rural road renewal project improved household consumption 3%–4% annually for rich and middle households, an impact not clearly seen among poor households. Thus, our findings show that the economic benefits of rural road improvement might not be well-inclusive.
AB - This paper explores the heterogeneous impact of a rural road improvement project on the economic activities and living standards of households in Morocco. Road pavement improvements are expected to promote better market access, encourage the transformation of traditional agricultural activities, and create opportunities for new economic activities. However, benefits may not extend evenly across different groups, and the distributional consequences call for careful empirical investigation. We employ a difference-in-differences (DID) estimation using a household-level panel dataset collected under a quasi-experimental setting in the 2010s. We classify households into three groups based on asset holdings (rich, middle, and poor). We provide several new findings. First, there was no significant transformation of agricultural production or sales for all groups. Second, rich households increased hired agricultural labor and began paid employment while middle households started new family businesses. Poor households, however, did not enjoy these new employment opportunities except for a marginal increase in family businesses. Third, due to shifts in employment, the rural road renewal project improved household consumption 3%–4% annually for rich and middle households, an impact not clearly seen among poor households. Thus, our findings show that the economic benefits of rural road improvement might not be well-inclusive.
KW - agriculture
KW - family business
KW - inclusive growth
KW - rural road improvement
KW - wage employment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151417013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85151417013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/rode.12989
DO - 10.1111/rode.12989
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85151417013
SN - 1363-6669
JO - Review of Development Economics
JF - Review of Development Economics
ER -